“Why would you even get into bestiality?” he asked. “We’re not into bestiality,” said Patel.
In a further exchange, Patel explained to Senator John Kennedy, the Louisiana Republican, that previously, regulations had barred anyone who engaged in bestiality “on either side of it.”
“Either side of what, the bestiality?” asked Kennedy. “So you disqualified the animal?”
“We have great canines, but we’re not going to disqualify them,” said Patel.
This is the type of shit that would be written for a South Park episode.
South America get it right patriot
“We have great canines, but we’re not going to disqualify them,” said Patel.


Jesus, is this what even qualifies as a distraction now? If gas prices keep going up Kash may end up sucking off a llama in front of Congress.
I would feel sorry and embarrassed for the llama.
This hasn’t been in the news (I’ve seldom seen this in reputable places other than Wired), so it’s an ineffective distraction if so.
Imagine his eyeballs! I would feel really sorry for the llama.
Fuck, these people are weird.
Its hard to understand why they would do this. Some high muckety muck must have hit bestiality (I’m sure they prefer “zoophilia”) on their polygraph, or else its a opener/stage setter to ease a broader category of crimes, probably pedophilia and rape.
But no one can claim the GOP doesn’t love animals anymore. A Lot. Patels claim that this is aimed at protecting sexual assault vicitims is nonsensical. They could carve out a law specifically for that use case but they didnt. And the FBI pushing a law specifically for an exceedingly rare outcome for victims is out of pattern. Its not about victims, its to protect perpetrators-- as is usual for republicans in the US.
Its hard to understand why they would do this. Some high muckety muck must have hit bestiality (I’m sure they prefer “zoophilia”) on their polygraph
Wasn’t one of the potential identities of the mysterious “Bubba” that Trump was rumored to have blown a horse?
As weird as it sounds, I assumed there was some logic to this, and there was at least one case where someone had been the victim of sexual abuse and was forced to engage in bestiality. Then someone with half a brain realised that such a victim had no repulsive proclivities, so shouldn’t be excluded as a candidate on that basis.
The mere mention of the topic encourages irrational discourse.
They could have let in those people by adding the word “willingly”. They changed this rule to start letting in the more violent people they’ll need for the next stage of the reich.
deleted by creator
It kind of looks like an X with stars.
Why do I get the impression some second rate LLM scraped references to "fucking the dog’ and turned it into official FBI policy?
I think it’s really just as simple as Kash Patel likes doggie dicks. It’s not rocket science.
I think it’s really just as simple as Kash Patel likes doggie dicks. It’s not red rocket science.
FTFY
Two years of total control and this is what they consider a win?
I know there’s no conservatives here because Lemmy is very much not a safe space for them, but I’d really like to ask one what the fuck they think winning is.
There’s conservatives everywhere on Lemmy lmfao. There’s even conservatives who think they’re communists, there are so many right wing cesspools here just like every other website. There’s also just a lot of right wing propaganda that’s so prevalent elsewhere that it’s getting regurgitated by majority of people worldwide and then gets plastered all over here by “extreme leftists” who don’t even realize what they’re saying. I do envy your experience here though.
I blocked ml. That’s probably why.
Lol that’s a good point, I haven’t blocked any communities and only blocked a couple users.
I probably should currate my Lemmy experience more, i seem to get an overwhelming amount of far right content or trans communities just like back on reddit. Not that those two types of content are comparable at all, nor am I bothered by trans content in my feed, it just has nothing to with me and occasionally I’ll unknowingly comment in a community that does not need or want my input, same thing happens with communities for women or regions of the world I have no direct ties to.
Honestly just double check the community before ya comment on it. Or block them as needed, probably no the most elegant solution but it works. Personally I just blocked .lm and my instance defederated enough of the other toxic fuckers that it’s pretty good for me. Still lots of Trans shit but who the fuck cares, sons of bitches and daughters of bastards tend to have decent enough shit posts.
I’d really like to ask one what the fuck they think winning is.
its pretty clear that being able to fuck livestock on a streetcorner and get away with it = winning. Good job republicans. Whenever I’ve heard “the south will rise again” this is exactly the sort of stuff I thought would happen. This and the elimination of womens rights and the legal enshrinement of racism.
I’d really like to ask one what the fuck they think winning is.
Not a conservative, but I guess “them libs” being mad is worth it for them?
True, but they dont love being laughed at for being idiots. And this will 100% result in a lot of comedy at their expense. So GOP leadership must want this pretty badly. It could be related to this governments attempts to integrate government functions with the state of israel.
The cruelty to immigrants makes everything else worthwhile to a lot of them. There’s also much enthusiasm for Hegseth’s bro-ification of the armed services. For wealthier supporters, the enablement of open corruption is a huge plus.
Anyone whose identity requires them to be Republican, but isn’t enthused about previous points, can fall back on the claim that Dems would be even worse and this is the lesser evil.
They say the sky is green, the govt says it’s green. They say you are vermin, the govt says your vermin. They definitely love seeing you having to live beneath whatever they say. Costs be damned, they won.
Must be a particular color blindness

I guess that’s one way to out one of your kinks.
Spiderkash on XVideos has kinks?
These DEI hiring standards are getting out of hand.
Are companies going to have to hire donkey fuckers to their boards in order to comply or what?
so ‘donkey shows’ are real… they’re part of the interview process at an fbi job fair.
You mean more donkey fuckers?
I’m gettting tired of saying this but I’m glad I’m not an Onion writer. Those poor guys have never had to work so hard to get a head of reality.
I think they’re having a blast. Shit that was “too far out there” is now getting approved.
Which White Supremacist group is it that has bestiality as an initiation rite?
“We’re not into beastiality,” said Patel. “It’s interspecies erotica, and we will not engage in this type of kink shaming.”
If the other spices cannot be consenting a consenting partner, wouldn’t that be interspecies rape and sexual assault? I don’t want anyone willing to commit sexual assault regardless of the species as law enforcement, especially in this dumb fuck wanna be Nazi government
It’s a Clerks 2 reference.
You a vegan?
You’re an idiot.
I get this quote!











