• hperrin@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s paraphrasing, but that’s pretty much what he said:

      Quite honestly, if that’s the level of bugs we’re dealing with due to our use of AI tools, that’s a pretty good deal. I’ve seen much worse, so much worse in code that we actually shipped in releases. And no AI was used to create those critical bugs.

      Libel requires the statement to be false.

    • Mechanism@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      These people are ridiculous. This is an open source side project, if people don’t want “ai slop” in their app, then maybe they should fork the project and maintain it themselves.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        They can’t fork it now because the fact that the AI commits aren’t labeled as such means there’s no way to tell which need to be removed.

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    If he can’t be bothered with the project anymore, just give it up, don’t resort to shitty ai.

    • Kory@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      They are thinking about this for a while now, in January they announced: “Lastly and on an unrelated note, we’ve also begun testing Faugus Launcher as a potential replacement for Lutris in our :testing branch. If we move forward with this change, we’ll provide at least six months of advance notice before removing Lutris so you’ll have plenty of time to migrate your prefixes.”