• Peacepath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Even without die of it, I would still prefer to avoid cancer. And smoking clearly rise the risk to have one.

    Also, a cure we may have someday, is just a call to found research, not a real promise. Don’t build anything on such.

      • Peacepath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Cancer is an health issue. Without health consequences at all, smoking would not be a problem.

        I don’t see how moral could be related to smoking…

        • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Because when you have a scenario where if you get cancer all you do is take a pill full of nanobots and you’re cured, it’s working kind of hard to find a problem with that. Admit it. It feels icky and wrong to say “It’s okay to smoke”. There’s a part of you that feels guilty for writing what you just wrote. What if a child reads that and starts smoking because of what you said?

          • twopi@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            Admit it. It feels icky and wrong to say “It’s okay to shoot yourself in the head”. There’s a part of you that feels guilty for writing what you just wrote. What if a child reads that and starts shooting themselves in the head because of what you said?

            “It’s okay to eat rotten food that has mold growth on” “It’s okay to stop breathing air” “It’s okay to tan using a UVC lamp” It’s okay to jump off a skyscraper"

            The only reason why you consider one question (smoking) to be a moral issue instead of all questions is because you want to smoke. You’re not saying jumping off skyscrapers is a moral issue, let along the infinite other questions not listed here.