U.S. President Donald Trump has ordered a suspension of all military aid to Ukraine, escalating pressure on President Volodymyr Zelensky mere days after a heated exchange in the Oval Office cast doubt on U.S. support for Kyiv.

A senior Defense Department official told Bloomberg that all U.S. military assistance to Ukraine is on hold until Trump determines that Ukrainian leaders are making a genuine effort toward peace.

The pause affects not only future aid but also weapons already in transit, including shipments on aircraft and ships, as well as equipment awaiting transfer in Poland.

MBFC
Archive

Edit: changed source from Bloomberg to Kyiv Independent b/c there’s no paywall and more detail in the story.

  • ShadowRam@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s having a melt-down because the rest of the world is siding with Ukraine (as they should)

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t know that, and I’m skeptical that Trump would go to that much trouble to come up with an excuse. He hasn’t needed an excuse to do anything else he’s been doing.

      What I would expect Trump to do is just pull support and if anybody asks him why, say loudly “America First!!!”

      • smeenz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s exactly how trump operates. See the threat he posted this morning to block federal funding to universities that “let students protest” - he’s going to block funding anyway, he just needs a plausible way to blame them for it.

        Same thing here - a plausible way to blame Ukraine for withdrawing US support.

        Plausible to maga anyway.

  • ray1992xd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    US apparently also quit providing intel to Ukraine. Sorry for the Dutch link as source, best to use a browser translator on it.

    Article

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Guess what. War is gonna happen regardless. Except now the Ukrainians are going to have a harder time fighting back, while the russians start their pogroms.

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Russia will keep killing Ukrainians, so they need be forced to stop. Letting russia next it’s neighbours is a fucking stupid take. Appeasing the colonial fascist has never gone well before, and it won’t now. Ukrainians are fighting for their homes. Succeeding land like Crimea didn’t stop russia from invading so it won’t stop it again.

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s better to try something. What your idea is to do nothing. Great idea, let’s just continue letting people die.

              No, my idea isn’t to “do nothing”. It’s to fund and support Ukrainian sovereignty lol. No clue where the fuck you are pulling that from. You want more people to die, let russia have it’s way, way more people will die. I’m glad your comfortable with the thought of other countries just annexing territory on a whim. Fucking shit tier take

              • Internetexplorer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh sorry, your supporting Ukraine, so they can continue the killing. What a moronic route.

                So just continue with the killing.

                That’s not doing anything differently.

                Succeeding land will stop the war.

                Make Russia sign a peace treaty with America and Ukraine for the land.

                It’s infinitely better than your idea of just continue the killing. “It’s fine”

                Brain-dead.

                • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh sorry, your supporting Ukraine, so they can continue the killing. What a moronic route.

                  Nah, I’m supporting Ukraine to defend their sovereignty. The killing can stop, russia needs to fuck back off to russia

                  Ceeding the land to russia won’t stop any war, at best it will put a temporary pause until they want more, causing more pain and suffering and death.

                  Make russia fuck back off to russia is the only viable option, unless you think appeasing fascist dictators is a good idea.

                  Brain-dead.

                  That is the only explanation as to why you said the things to say. Hey being self aware is step one. Maybe don’t victim blame.

  • Arda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Russians agent, we are all witnessing soulles pigs destroy democracy and the lifes of millions for their own gains

      • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like the dumb from reddit is leaking into lemmy more and more. You’re a traitor to democracy if you think we shouldn’t fund and supply Ukraine

        • alkbch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          How is one a traitor to democracy for opposing unlimited funding and supplying of Ukraine?

        • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          US is broke, have u seen the debt numbers?
          It went into unontrollable territory.
          Payments for debt financing alone is as much as military spending. This is dumb.
          US has no choice but to radically change

  • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t really matter most European tech is way ahead of the US anyway, it’s just they the US pay stupid amounts to their own companies. I kinda feel most US tech is a super expensive in comparison honestly.

    I feel a cupholder on a US jet would be valued at something like 50,000. I’d honestly be really curious how a Rafale fared against say a f-35 I suspect it would win

    My suspicion is an European jets would own and devestate an American ones while being a small fraction of the price.

    Yes I am honestly saying while America spends stupid amount off Defense they don’t hold the slightest advantage tech wise.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In that specific match up the F-35 would win the majority of the time. The Rafale would win when it was able to get inside the F-35’s missiles. The problem is a modern fighter versus fighter engagement starts with long range missiles launches. So the side that sees first launches first. Then they go into tight S turns to keep radar tracking on their missiles while maintaining range. At some point the enemy also acquires them on radar and does the same thing. They will keep doing this until the enemy missiles reach a minimum distance and they will dive and turn away with chaff. This breaks the radar link but you’re hoping the missiles are close enough to acquire targets on their own. So the side that sees the other one first and launches first, even by a few seconds gains a massive advantage. That’s what stealth tech is about.

      Now that said, there is a Euro stealth fighter in the works, but it’s not expected until 2040.

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        How do we know they were for ukraine to begin with? One thing is clear: they aren’t for russia so the narrative that USA is helping russia or halting operations against them doesn’t old much against the evidence.

        • matlag@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They ARE halting operations against Russia. Factual and official. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/02/politics/us-cyber-operations-russia-suspend/index.html

          And now, after stopping military aid, they’ve announced they would no longer provide Ukraine with intel. So these patrol are no longer an action against Russia, given they won’t be used in military operations. Another big win for Russia. Again factual and official.

          Next step is apparently lifting sanctions against Russia https://www.reuters.com/world/white-house-seeks-plan-possible-russia-sanctions-relief-sources-say-2025-03-03/ This would provide Russia with a desperately needed source of income while economists were speculating that its economy was at risk of a complete collapse in 2025. So Trump is hurrying a relief there.

          Do they need to send military aid to Russia directly before we can claim they switched side?

            • matlag@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              index

              Ok, let’s make sense out of this

              • The US gov announced very officially they stopped providing military aid to Ukraine.
              • The US gov announced very officially they stop provivding intelligence to Ukraine.
              • Trump asked very openly for a draft on lifting sanctions on Russia.

              But they got some planes flying over the black sea, that collect intel, the same intel they said won’t be shared with Ukraine therefore will not be used against Russia interests whatsoever, and that’s your evidence to claim their actions are ambiguous?

              I was wrong. They CAN supply Russia with weapons and you’ll claim it’s still ambiguous. Actually, they can probably bomb Ukraine themselves as much as a certain individual can shoot someone on the 5th avenue without losing a single supporter.-

              • index@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                How many times US government announced they were working to stop the genocide in gaza but were actually fueling it?

                But they got some planes flying over the black sea

                They have been flying fleets of planes near russia since the war started, probably even before that but not many were watching.

                • matlag@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Gaza and Ukraine are 2 totally different cases, using one to assess the other makes no sense. In Gaza, under Biden, they barely announced they would hold on deliveries to Israel, and they did to a bare minimum. There was no secret hidden delivery, it was in plain sight for all to see. One of the reasons is some high profile donors of the Dems are supporting Netanyahu.

                  Under Trump, the position has changed for a full support of the ethnic cleansing of Gaza, and they resumed the delivery of larger bombs, that Biden had indeed been withholding.

                  The US collect intelligence in many different places worldwide. They didn’t say they would stop collecting intelligence, they said they would stop sharing it with Ukraine. The goal is not hidden, it’s been announced and the acts are consistent: it’s to force Zelensky to surrender to Russia, what Trump calls a “peace plan” in exchange of… well nothing, really. Ukraine loses, as simple as that.

                  There is no secret chess play here. If you ask why Trump supports Russia against pretty much all of the US (former?) allies now, then we venture into speculation, though many of us have an idea. But is he supporting Russia? Yes, definitely, the evidences are compelling. That’s no longer a question. It’s more than time to accept it.

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          What narrative about helping russia? If they stop supporting Ukraine, they are helping russia…

              • Zink@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                “Narrative” has been an american conservative dog whistle for a while now, as far as I can tell.

                It translates roughly to “the reported facts which should not be believed because they don’t work for MY narrative.” So basically just the usual projection. And it’s even a smart-sounding word which really helps it carry weight with dummies.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How much more do we have to witness before we accept, as a society, that Donald Trump and the GOP are enemies of the United States of America, and act accordingly?

    We are suffering and losing our position as a world leader because of a felon rapist traitor. When are we going to stop this?

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      1. Joining and organizing within your local community to create connections with others is incredibly powerful, will lay the groundwork for effective resistance.
      2. We can effect things drastically with a general strike. This can massively impact their income streams, and can bring a government to its knees if done on a large enough scale.
      3. Join the IWW and attempt to unionize your workplace, so that the general strike is even more effective.

      If we put in the work, we can resist this and we can win. Join up with allies while we still can easily!

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      When are we going to stop this?

      When congress starts impeachment proceedings. Call your representatives. Listening you complain is their job.

            • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              It sounded like you were saying “You already impeached him, and he’s still president (so impeaching him again is a waste of time)”, but I could’ve misread you.

              • Tamo240@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                That is also my point. Don’t worry though, you keep impeaching him until he dissolves congress.

                You’re response being ‘yeah but you can be impeached multiple times’ exactly demonstrates the weakness of that action.

  • OmarDontScare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I kinda wonder what people in the 3 letter agencies are thinking right now. I would hope that enough of these agencies actually view Trump as a fundamental threat to democracy, because he actually is. People have warned for this to happen, for a while now, even though many are surprised at the speed at which it happens. But still, you would kind of hope for some of these agencies to actually stand for the constitution, instead of for the ruling party and his current president.

    The US is so much more than just the current political ruling class. It’s sad that there seems at least, to be so little visible opposition to their efforts to derail the US geopolitical power and to overthrow the system of law and order. One who the Republicans should hold deep, and definitely the people who pledge their allegiance to the constitution. I wonder if it would have gone different if someone like Saunders or Obama would have tried a similar play.

      • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        We will see. Pax Americana has been a hugely stabilizing force in many regions around the world. If an empire falls, fighting over the power vacuum commences. Empires get replaced by chaos and eventually other empires.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are we also derailing Chinese and Russian power, and magically disarming all the nukes? Or are we just shitting on America and hoping nobody realizes that means there’s going to be a power vacuum?

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So the record currently stands at…

    Zelensky - Let’s try a deal, we just need security guarantees

    Trump - Why are you so Disrespectful?

    Zelensky - Let’s try a deal, we just need security guarantees

    Trump - Putin is a victim we’re undoing sanctions

    Zelensky - Let’s try a deal, we just need security guarantees

    Trump - Why won’t Zelensky do a deal?

    Zelensky - Let’s try a deal, we just need security guarantees

    Trump - We’re stopping Aid.

    • alkbch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US won’t provide the security guarantees Zelenskyy is asking for. He can try getting them from European countries though, but they do not seem willing to provide them either.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        At least count I’m pretty sure the UK, Sweden, and Australia have all said they’d be willing to put troops into Ukraine for peacekeeping.

        • alkbch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          UK has stated in no uncertain terms that they require US involvement in order to put troops into Ukraine for peacekeeping. I’m not sure about Sweden & Australia.

  • Grizzlyboy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Since he can’t do this and needs congress’ help, why aren’t they stopping him? Why are they all bending over backwards to please Putin?

    • skygirl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the only meaningful political move for Republicans today is to follow Trump. If they push back they get cut from the pack and lose support.