Didn’t they say this last year that they finished? Am I imagining that or did they backtrack?
They’ve always been quite clear that this is a passion project and that they’re nowhere near done with it. However, that doesn’t stop a chunk of the community from being absolutely convinced that the next update is the last, pointing to all kinds of obscure wording from old interviews or data mined files that are clearly incomplete as proof of this. It’s a really weird thing and I don’t get it at all. I remember last year a lot of people were spreading rumors that the summer update would be the last, based on kind of weird numerology. It’s baffling.
I kinda think they might be on the Minecraft problem chain of… decorating a bit too much without adding much to the core experience.
Yeah, they’re adding stuff, but as someone who’s played recently, the gameplay loop is still the same it’s always been.
But you should have…
they should improve the flight model and add hotas and hosas support.
then race course parts and the ability to build them in space. If both could be used together that would make for some really wild courses.
and the ability to have a drone or hired npc pilot your extra ships to haul stuff or pick you up if you get gunned down in space, and pilot ejection module to go with that.
maybe also a less clunky way to open the rng upgrade module in bulk and choose the top 3
I mean, it would have been nice if the game had been finished when it came out…
But hey, they’ve fixed nearly every problem I had with the game on launch. Which is infinitely more than most of the companies who release shitty broken games.
Did they fix that bit where they forgot to put an actual game in there yet?
Yep! Unfortunately your parents forgot to put an actual brain in you, and it doesn’t seem like they’ll be getting around to it
So the gameplay loop has changed since launch? Or did they simply make the shallow puddle wider?
In the way a sandbox should, yes - better exploration, mechs, expedition stories, freighters, better base building, etc. It’s a sandbox game, it’s not feasible for a game to be as deep as a rpg and wide enough to do anything you want without adhering to a story or dev-induced goal. Dwarf fortress might come the closest to that, but that’s only because they have a super wide fortress mode and a super deep adventure mode and they are fully separate.
If you want a deep gameplay loop, play a game meant for it like a rpg. Those are meant to be deep but relatively narrow to keep you on the story. If you want a wide pool to do whatever you want, play a sandbox like NMS or Minecraft.
I just want a sandbox with meaningful town NPCs, not just a placeholder for a menu.
there are towns, though when I last played the only interactions were really the conflict event thing, and I don’t think it really did anything. I’m curious by what you’re thinking is meaningful for the NPCs to do. Something like DF where they build out their own skills/story?
I should give this game a try.
