• mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Can you source this? I can’t find any links that talk about fentanyl sales being banned. The site sold thousands of drugs/gold/bitcoin/cash/ids/hacking tools, on and on:

      Banning a popular drug seems unlikely. Testing to make sure people weren’t selling it anyway certainly never happened.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Your wiki link doesn’t list fentanyl in that section:

          In March 2013, the site had 10,000 products for sale by vendors, 70% of which were drugs.[19][79] Drugs were grouped under the headings stimulants, psychedelics, prescription, precursors, other, opioids, ecstasy, dissociatives, and steroids/PEDs.[15][14][80][81] Fake driver’s licenses were also offered for sale.[82] The site’s terms of service prohibited the sale of certain items. When the Silk Road marketplace first began, the creator and administrators instituted terms of service that prohibited the sale of anything whose purpose was to “harm or defraud”.[14][83] This included child pornography, stolen credit cards, assassinations, and weapons of any type.

          The bans look pretty explicit, and fentanyl isn’t one of them. Fentanyl is a wildly powerful opioid, which silk road seemed glad to sell. The site specifically allowed the sale of thousands of opiates of varying potency.

          Your second link discusses how known fentanyl sellers were traced to silk road drug sellers bitcoin wallets:

          This is likely not a new trend, and numerous vendors possibly also deal with other drug substances alongside fentanyl. Vendor clusters with Bitcoin payments to fentanyl suppliers have also been identified interacting with dark web marketplaces that have since gone offline, such as Silk Road and Hydra.

          These links dont support that fentanyl was directly banned on Silk road. They actually show that fentanyl was likely commonly sold on Silk road in one form or another.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Decriminalised use/possession, for sure.

      But I always think the libertarian “just legalise all the drugs” is just odd.

      Regulated? So you mean preventing people from taking really stupid shit? Sounds great sign me up lol

      People gotta accept there are trade-offs to living in a society, and one of those is that there’s a limit to which we allow each other to get high. Because there are some drugs that make people aggressive, and I personally think these ought to be curtailed where possible. (Again, not a “war on drugs” style curtailment. But distribution, still illegal and criminal)

      You wanna take shit like meth? Cool, go out to the woods and never use socialised medicine where workers are at risk from people on such drugs, or just randoms walking down the street.

      I don’t think taking hard drugs should put you in prison, or even give you a criminal record, but actually legalising the distribution? Nah. Go live in the woods/hills away from everyone else.

      • s23b@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because there are some drugs that make people aggressive, and I personally think these ought to be curtailed where possible. (Again, not a “war on drugs” style curtailment. But distribution, still illegal and criminal)

        The first such drug that comes to my mind is alcohol. Its distribution was also criminalized in the past, eventually leading to an increase in organized crime.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is of course nuance to this, and I don’t claim to be an expert on classifying drugs. Though, I don’t reckon I need to try to hard to argue that there are drugs far worse than alcohol out there. I’m simply stating a blanket “all drugs should be legal” is overkill.

          Alcohol certainly is ripe for abuse, also.

          • Bobbinapples@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Drug criminalization pushes use into the shadows so that the most visible use is from those who are very loud and disruptive with it. I know you think you’re righteous with your “i don’t reckon i need to try to(sic) hard to argue” but you are operating on assumptions about substances borne of ignorance.

            • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not arguing for criminalisation of use and posession.

              Just making distribution of all drugs legal is overkill, in my opinion

        • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t really fully agree with the person you are responding too, but the level of aggression brought about from Meth use is significantly more potent and consistent compared to Alcohol, which is a little more variable depending on the person using it.

      • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know if Meth use should constitute total exile from society, especially if you are trying to get off of it. Its a highly addictive drug and usually people use it because of a state of being deprived and desperate of any joy in life.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is a misunderstanding, apologies. I’m saying if you’re advocating complete legalisation of distribution of every single drug out there, then I’m using hyperbole to point out that this is too much “freedom to” without considering “freedom from”.

          I think all drug use should be decriminalised.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tankies and libs are both authoriatians supporting different but co-dependent empires.

        They’re basically the same thing.

            • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I honestly never heard the term “tankie” before a few days ago. What is it? Extremist communists?

              • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Tankies are fans of authoritarianism masquerading as communism. The term comes from the famous Tiananmen Square image.

                Edit: I was misinformed

              • danciestlobster@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s pretty much it, yeah. It’s worth noting, there is a lot of animosity on here, particularly from .world, for .ml and .hexbear instances. Both are heavily communist, far left communities, and get a bad rep because they are known for not accommodating liberal or other not as left viewpoints. This was particularly heated around the election with disagreements about voting for liberals vs protest voting.

                Fwiw I’m a strong believer if we are to organize against literal fascism we will need the liberal and the farther left to find enough common ground to work together. It’s a…work in progress on here.

                • c0wboy dani@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  db0 (my instance and @Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com’ ) is a leftist anarchist instance and I’d say the animosity towards tankies is even stronger here.

                  it’s not anything to do with liberals vs leftists it’s that they handwave genocide and other atrocities as “western propaganda” and worship lennin and mao and stalin and north korea and so on and so forth.

                • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I would have organized against Harris because that would have been easier. I’m not looking to get shot by brown shirts in the street.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea, there are so many other guys, that he pardoned, which are way worse…

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Your choice, I won’t force you to read it, keep spreading misinformation all you want. It’s there for any who actually want to learn about his case and find out those charges were dropped and the agents convicted themselves.

            • turnip@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I love that the left loves the war on drugs just to own the conservatives. The two are more alike than they think.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Before pardon: Free Ross

                Wrong president does it: Wait akshully the corrupt cops that were convicted were right even though he was acquitted of those charges for lack of evidence!

                Fucking mind boggling. Like fuck me I don’t like the annoying orange either but this was the right move, he never should have been in jail (at all, end the drug war, but…) especially not “for life” for the crime of running a website.

                And free fucking Snowden while we’re here, goddamn.

              • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                First time hearing that I like the war on drugs that I’ve so violently despised my entire life to fulfill a petty political agenda.

                I’m glad we have you here to correctly interpret what we think and believe! I bet you have many more similar gold nuggets that you can pull out of your colon.

      • Liamk57@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        For the whole drug exchange platform fair enough it might have beeneoverkill. But we are still talking about a guy who was up for killing people on his way. Not sure they are the best for society

  • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s always been nothing but smoke and mirrors with Trump

    The thing he cares about is making you think he cares

    The grift is always his focus

  • ElectricVocalist@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fentanyl is so bad it is prohibied even on deep web illegal marketplaces. Do some research before spreading lies. A lot of stuff was not allowed on the silk road.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If any of these worthless politicians actually gave a shit about drug abuse, they would end prohibition and offer basic social services.

    Never gonna happen regardless of the politician’s brand.

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      All research and successful drug policy shows that treatment should be increased and law enforcement decreased while abolishing mandatory minimum sentences

      • killingspark@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I will never understand how ruining someones life because they are using drugs is supposed to help them get off of drugs.

        Edit: don’t get me wrong, it’s great that this has been researched, but it seems so obvious.

  • cowfodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Did this stupid mother fucker really refer to the Prime Minister of Canada as “governor”? Can’t tell if pushing the 51st state bullshit or he’s just that fucking dumb!

    • SippyCup@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Carpet bomb them with inaccuracies and they’ll spend too much time correcting you to keep up.

    • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      He thinks speaking diminutively to people automatically puts him in a position of power over them

      It’s an insecurity issue common with bullying

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wish people would start responding by referring to him as “washed up reality TV personality Trump”, or even better, “convinced felon Trump”

        It’s great because unlike “Governor Trudeau”, it’s actually true

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He has been for a while now, which is actually a violation of the US’ nato obligations. But who care anymore, the US is no longer an ally.

      Edit: it also violates a ton of border treaties, and half a doze international agreements the US has benefited from for a long time. But just with NATO:

      Key points of the treaty

      • The parties agree to settle disputes peacefully
      • The parties agree to refrain from using force in a way that goes against the United Nations’ goals
      • The parties agree to consider an attack on one of them as an attack on all of them
      • The parties agree to consult about threats and defense matters
      • The parties agree to safeguard the freedom, common heritage, and civilization of their peoples
      • The parties agree to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area

      Threatening Canada violates all of these and then some.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Canada at least has a “Governor-General” who is appointed by the British monarch.

      Edit: like several other commonwealth states, Canada is a completely separate country from the United Kingdom. It just happens, by law, that King Charles III is the king of all of them.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.worksdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        When talking about what Charles III is doing in relation to Canada in his position a king, we’re supposed to refer to him as the monarch of Canada, we just don’t tend to do it because he doesn’t live here full time.

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look, when the King of Canada, or his Governor General, perform official acts for Canada, they use the Great Seal of Canada, not the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. It’s totally different, I promise.

    • papertowels@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the new “we’ll build a wall, and mexico will pay for it” - a clause so dumb that people will complain about that, unknowingly tugging “normalcy” a step in that direction.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another garbage pardon by garbage people. Why does he like criminals soo much!? Oh yeah, he is one himself.

    I guess the silver lining is that we can recognize no one single entity should be allowed this discretion to pardon people. Donald Cuck’s abuse of this privilege helps us realize that is should not be a privilege at all.

  • Anivia@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As much as I hate Trump, I don’t think this is the “gotcha” it is being portraied as by this tweet. Silk Road was one of the best things to happen for the “safer use” movement of all time. The ability to not have to deal with shady street dealers and order from darknet suppliers on a platform that had legitimate reviews and an escrow system was a huge improvement to the safety of drugs users. It meant a much lower risk of contaminated drugs or getting scammed out of your money.

    Of course Ross allegedly also attempted to hire a hitman, which is how he got caught, cause the hitman was an undercover agent, so he allegedly is not a good guy regardless of how you think about him helping people get access to cleaner drugs, but that’s besides the point the author of the tweet is trying to make

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      People died from overdoses not to mention lots more ruined lives. I get you like the idea of drugs that are safer to order but that does not make it a good thing.

      Also lots of child pornography, murder for hire, human trafficking, and all kinds of other shitty things took place. So yeah, not exactly a good thing.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        lots of child pornography, murder for hire, human trafficking,

        Are you talking about silk road? Is this some lib conspiracy that I haven’t heard? I think you need to read something based in reality.

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        People die from overdoses every day without the Silk Road so I don’t know where you get off making that argument.

        And in what world is safer drugs NOT a good thing?

        And I’m pretty sure every social media service has had problems with everything you listed at the bottom.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          When someone facilitates the selling of illicit unregulated substances that cause the death of others they are often held responsible. Pretty sure that’s how it is supposed to work.

          I get it, you want to have an illegal unregulated illicit drug market and you don’t care who it harms. Pretty sure that makes you a POS unless I am missing something.

      • Kahless@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Silk Road did not offer child pornography, weapons, people or hitman services. Ross Ulbricht did not hire a hitman to kill his roommate. He was framed by the FBI and the roommate was coerced into helping stage the murder. The roommate later appologized and tried to get Ulbricht out of prison. Don’t believe all the propaganda. Drugs are dangerous, but law inforcement is always more dangerous.

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pardoning Ulbricht is the incredibly thin silver lining of Trump’s presidency. These drug war advocates talk like they really believe this problem can be solved with criminal justice, meanwhile they defund harm reduction education and make healthcare inaccessible. It’s diabolical.

    • Professorozone@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had never heard of him or the Silk Road. I just looked it up and it seems like there was some benefit to creating a place where people could find drugs without the dangerous human encounters that can happen during these sales but it also said that the site was used to trade in illegal weapons, hacking tools and tutorials, hit men for hire and other unlawful goods and services. Doesn’t sound like much of a silver lining to me. More like an aluminum lining.

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Would you trade in weapons or hacking tools? Those are societal problems and locking up a single person makes literally zero difference to that problem. The reality is that there are now many competing sites offering the same items and worse. The opioid crisis in America was created by literally one family, the Sackler’s, why aren’t they in prison? This is a justice system that behaves like a banana republic.

        • Professorozone@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your agreement could be used for the crime of mass shootings. It’s a societal problem, what’s the use in locking up one person?

          I think if it’s true, he should be locked up AND the Sacklers right next to him.

          • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is a criminal justice system where penalties scale with skin colour and inversely with wealth. They got pissy with Ulbricht due to the sheer scale of the manhunt required to get one person, a vast sum was spent that could have been spent on healthcare and harm reduction. They don’t actually care about the damage that drugs do or rehabilitation, this is about punishment. Everyone needs to take responsibility for their actions, except wealthy white people.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ulbricht was a sack of shit. He tried to hire several hitmen to kill agents investigating his stuff. He isn’t someone you want to get behind.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        He tried to hire several hitmen federal agents to kill agents investigating his stuff.

        In Ross’ defense people should defend themselves from violent prohibitionists who lock encage, torture, and murder people.

        Prohibitionists are the true sacks of shit. Endlessly profiting from drugs and violence.

        • Hominine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          …prohibiting the sale of child pornography, weapons, and drugs. But I see you’re neatly setting some of these aside.

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The war on drugs is not ethical and the very last people I will get behind are law enforcement. The case against Ulbricht was a tissue of lies and fabrication.

  • iiinnnn@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pardoning him was however a good thing, given price gouging regarding medications

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What does that have to do with Ulbrecht??

      Edit: to be clear, darknet markets still exist, and never stopped existing. You don’t need to pardon someone convicted of attempted murder for this.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m going to guess there were prescription meds available on SR. The danger is, if they weren’t going through FDA or any oversight, it’s very possible they were some other “mix” containing addictive substances.