AbNormalHumanBeing
Some weird, German communist, hello. Obsessed with philosophy (German Idealism and its subsequent evolutions) and history (mainly everything since the French Revolution), as well as the Fediverse. Secondarily obsessed with video games as a cultural medium. Also somewhat able to program, but not that good.
- 30 Posts
- 16 Comments
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldto
Games@lemmy.world•It's Time We Talked about Disco Elysium, Again - People Make GamesEnglish
0·1 year agoTo give them some leeway - it seems that wasn’t for lack of trying to get more statements from other people involved, and they did try to provide statements by all involved parties were relevant with what they had available.
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldto
Games@lemmy.world•It's Time We Talked about Disco Elysium, Again - People Make GamesEnglish
0·1 year agoThat was an interesting summary of the happenings since last time, and I appreciate them delving into the criticisms of their last documentary - which I think was overall also a good work of research overall, even if the mistakes they made (and acknowledged) were real.
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldto
Ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone•It's Time We Talked about Disco Elysium, Again [Documentary by PeopleMakeGames]English
0·1 year agoI’m not giving up hope on Summer Eternal creating something that - even if the effect of DE can’t be reached again ever - could build on it in interesting ways. They could channel the outsider effect along with convictions in the team in a way, that could provide at least some magic. But I am ready to be disappointed, of course.
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldto
unix_surrealism@lemmy.sdf.org•the myth of the good tech giantEnglish
0·1 year agoIt’s about Clippit, which was a mascot that notoriously annoyed MS Office users in the 90s and 2000s. It did not yet collect your data the way everything does now.
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldto
Deutschland@feddit.org•Ein Gespenst geht um im VerwaltungsgerichtEnglish
0·1 year agoHab das mal sehr grob überflogen, die interessanten/relevanten Anteile beginnen ab Seite 35. In der Tat ein eher oberflächliches Verständnis von Marx u. Engels in der Begründung, wie im Artikel erwähnt wurden anscheinend “www.staatslexikon-online” [sic] und das Kommunistische Manifest herangezogen, um das relevante - die grundlegende Unvereinbarkeit von Marx und GG - zu begründen.
Andere Sachen beim Überfliegen, wie in wie Weit sich nicht ausreichend von alten Publikationen distanziert wurde, kann ich nicht beurteilen.
Aber das Verständnis von Marx und Engels Werken, wie hier formuliert, ist meines Erachtens tatsächlich so oberflächlich, dass es an sich nicht zu einer blanko-Einstufung der Verfassunsfeindlichkeit taugen sollte. Gerade der späte Marx und Engels haben da durchaus differenziertere Beiträge geleistet. Es wirkt auf mich so, wie die Denker und Prinzipien der Französischen Revolution als grundlegend und gänzlich unvereinbar einzustufen, mit Bezug auf einzelne von Aussagen von Robespierre und die Terrorherrschaft während der Revolution.
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldto
unix_surrealism@lemmy.sdf.org•the myth of the good tech giantEnglish
0·1 year agoBonziBuddy was a herald of the apocalypse.
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldto
DACH - Deutschsprachige Community für Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz@feddit.org•Crack greift um sich: Ist Deutschlands repressive Drogenpolitik gescheitert? Derweil zeigt die Schweiz, wie es mit Entkriminalisierung und Konsumräumen besser geht.English
0·1 year agoUnd die
KillerDrogenspiele!!!
Wann wirds mal wieder richtig Sommer
So ein Sommer wie er früher einmal war
Ohne Hitzerekorde und ohne Waldbrände
Und nicht so heiß und drückend wie die letzten Jahr’
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldto
Fuck Cars@lemmy.world•San Francisco is deploying speed cameras this week. If everything goes according to plan, the number of deaths will be reducedEnglish
6·1 year agoThis paper seems to suggest so, but also mentions “Previous empirical work on this topic, which shows a diverse range of estimated effects […]” - so it seems like other factors will play a role. (Disclaimer: I read only the abstract)
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldOPto
Lemmy Moderators@lemmy.world•/c/peertube@lemmy.world in danger of going unmoderated - adding new moderators doesn't seem to federate properlyEnglish
0·1 year agoOK, knowing that takes a bit of pressure off, thank you very much. Then at least it should be possible to handle this even if adding the new accounts as mods myself won’t work out before tonight.
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldOPto
Lemmy Moderators@lemmy.world•/c/peertube@lemmy.world in danger of going unmoderated - adding new moderators doesn't seem to federate properlyEnglish
0·1 year agoI tried that, adding my lemmy.world account at the same time as my piefed.world account - sadly that one ended up never showing outside my original instance, and also got removed there without any visible reason. Is there a way for the admins to add it as a mod locally, after my original account is gone come this evening? It’s https://lemmy.world/u/AbnormalHumanBeing.
If not, I guess moving the comm to a new one on piefed.world would indeed be a workaround, but I’d like to try and get it working some other way beforehand. The comm on lemmy.world isn’t closing down, and it would be a bit sad to lose the posts there, right now, it can work as a decent place to browse Top/All of the community to check for past popular PeerTube channels and videos one might otherwise not have heard of.
I’ll try adding my two .world accounts again today, and hope it will work out this time, before closing time later tonight.
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldto
World News@lemmy.ml•🐝 Billionaire Dies After Swallowing a Bee During Polo MatchEnglish
0·1 year agoShe literally died for our sins
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldto
Announcements@lemmy.ml•Lemmy Development Update July 2025English
0·1 year agoThank you all for your work in contributing to the Fediverse! Both to you two main devs, and everyone that contributes, be it code, hosting or even just adding to the community!
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•I finally made the switchEnglish
0·1 year agoBecause that is the maximum time an average Linux user can stand without trying out a new Distro.
AbNormalHumanBeing@piefed.worldto
Australia@aussie.zone•‘Self-termination is most likely’: the history and future of societal collapseEnglish
8·1 year agoHumans just can’t seem to stop being dicks
It’s interesting, because the work itself seems to have the exact opposite thesis: Humans on average aren’t dicks, but inequality and the interests of a few elites with essentially personality disorders the way he frames it, amplify our worst tendencies. For many thousands of years of pre-history, archaeological evidence and anthropological observations clearly show humanity in much more egalitarian societies. The example he uses is of the Khoisan people:
All Goliaths, however, contain the seeds of their own demise, he says: “They are cursed and this is because of inequality.” Inequality does not arise because all people are greedy. They are not, he says. The Khoisan peoples in southern Africa, for example, shared and preserved common lands for thousands of years despite the temptation to grab more.
Instead, it is the few people high in the dark triad who fall into races for resources, arms and status, he says. “Then as elites extract more wealth from the people and the land, they make societies more fragile, leading to infighting, corruption, immiseration of the masses, less healthy people, overexpansion, environmental degradation and poor decision making by a small oligarchy. The hollowed-out shell of a society is eventually cracked asunder by shocks such as disease, war or climate change.”
In general, it’s not a very controversial take, that the current (i.e. of the past ~5k years) inequality did not arise as a natural state but became only possible through surplus.






















I mean - kind of? I do agree a lot of “reaction” content is bottom-of-the barrel shit, but it’s not like this one is just making funny faces and going “woaaah, nonono, they didn’t!!” or something. He does use the video as a jumping off point for his own commentary, providing his own perspectives (those segments are also edited with cuts, showing this wasn’t just turning their webcam on and rambling without any evaluation later). Just roughly looking through the preview thumbnails hovering over the video progress bar, easily more than 50% is talking about topics in the reacted video without even the reacted-to footage on screen.