

With fear of sounding like a smart ass, I do need to clarify your talking about the PRC, DPRK relationship, not what is a leftist?


With fear of sounding like a smart ass, I do need to clarify your talking about the PRC, DPRK relationship, not what is a leftist?


And it wont go anywhere because the UNSC has to recomend it and the US will not allow it
Except they say they are china, they have a one china policy hexk they claim mongolia and even more of the South china sea


While the DPRK and PRC are allies, the DPRK is not a puppet of the PRC. The PRC doesn’t have a military base nor does the PRC attempt to control or manipulate the doings of the DPRK.
As for your “Disputed among leftists.” I am not sure to what group of people who would call themselves leftists you are referring so I cannot comment on that
I was about to say its odd to put a flag of a nation that got destroyed as the poster for jim crow, and not the nation that did it


Atleast they chose a communist nation founded on the rights of the working class over Russia an ex commhnist country that is now capitalist. So it could get dumber


I mean suit your self, I have been critical of both, and if you would like I could leavy a criticism now and you can report it, I doubt I will be banned for that action, nor have my comment removed.
Also Sure, you dont like the way our instance is moderated, I have never seen an actual issue with it, beyond the concern trolling, however I understand, my comment was in reference to the origional comment implying that all of lemmy does not allow saying “All Bilionares deserve the guliteen” If your instance does, and your users are all fine with it, I have no issues, just dont go and say its all of us who are doing it.


it is not “lemmy” bans you for calling for Guillotines, it is Lemmy.world that banns you for calling for reasonable solutions. Watch, I Red Army Dog Cooper, want to guliteen all bilionares


the ICC is not part of the UN
so why even try to resist right? Lets just say we are sad about it
That does not change its nationalism, and reaking of american exceptionalism


I only brought it up because I know in the US marrage laws are often the same or lower than out age of consent laws
(from wikipedia) so I think the marrage laws are more damning, atleast in the US
Lets not forget, the USA has been at war for BY FAR the majority of its life, I think but dont quote me on this the US has only been at peace for 2 years
Look it has to be the US, the US is the only nation who has shown themselves to be untrustable with nuclear wepons, not only being the only nation to drop them and have them detonate in a war, but also during the cold war accidentaly dropping them all over and by some stroke of luck while merphy was sleeping none of them went off even when the safties where not engaged.
Democratic, when the leader did not get the majority of elegable votes. DEMOCRACY when studies show the government action has 0 corilation to the popular will … wow much democracy
Odd that your solution to criticism of place they (might) live is move to another place. I mean that kind of head in the sand thinking and blind naitonalism has never gone wrong ever


One nitpick on your post, you posted the age of concent not the age of allowable marrage, in in some places those are diffrent numbers
This from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage_age_in_the_United_States shows the earliest allowable marrage age in each state, and I promise you California’s age of concent is greater than 0


I have never seen evidence that women are not allowed to drive, and I have had Iranians tell me the contrary. IRNA Irans state news if it was not down from likely DDOS I would show you posted an immage of one of the dead from Israels attack, was a women without a head covering, agian there is no evidence I can find that it is a law, just a large cultural preference. Same think with a women in Iran being dependent on a man, I have seen no evidence for this outside of the Western press.
I just want to ask a clarification, are you saying anti-child marriage is a bad thing???


I mean it seems like you do not understand the rule that keeps getting cited, the reason russian gets removed when used as an insult is often times it is used in a racist or atleast racist adjacent way, and so the way .ml has decided to deal with that is that it just, isnt an insult, that is not that you can never critisize the russian federation ever, but you cannot use russian as an insult, because agian it is often used racistly or atleast racist adjacent.
I need to know why America thinks it has the leverage to issue demands any more
Also didnt the us block the PRC from buying chips