0·
1 year ago“I was good at math until they added letters”
“I used to get straight A’s”
“I was gifted untill they realised I was neuro divergent”
Bro you’re dumb now. Why should anyone care that you were above average as a literal child.
- 1 Post
- 9 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: June 29th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Oh good shout with the source and licence.
I wrote it from scratch, and filled in the vocabulary banks myself. I’m in my 3rd year of a machine learning PhD so I’m very familiar with the language used by AI bullshit salesmen.
I am not a language guy. So yeah, working out the conjugations was mostly trial and error. There’s still occasional grammatical problems in the output but its “good enough” for a low effort shitpost.
Please feel free to do whatever you want with the code.
0·1 year agoCensorship is when the French ask “what are you doing?”
Playing dolly
0·2 years agoBut a dog can’t play basketball!
0·2 years agoThe amount of fart sniffing in this thread is baffling. Like 20 people all saying “umm actually they’re still technically at war” ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
If the dems lose votes to the greens it will be because of their own fucking policies including genocide. They could always change their policies. But instead they blame the public.
0·2 years agoNot an ELI5, sorry. I’m an AI PhD, and I want to push back against the premises a lil bit.
Why do you assume they don’t know? Like what do you mean by “know”? Are you taking about conscious subjective experience? or consistency of output? or an internal world model?
There’s lots of evidence to indicate they are not conscious, although they can exhibit theory of mind. Eg: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.08708.pdf
For consistency of output and internal world models, however, their is mounting evidence to suggest convergence on a shared representation of reality. Eg this paper published 2 days ago: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07987
The idea that these models are just stochastic parrots that only probabilisticly repeat their training data isn’t correct, although it is often repeated online for some reason.
A little evidence that comes to my mind is this paper showing models can understand rare English grammatical structures even if those structures are deliberately withheld during training: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19827
What the fuck are you talking about