My Steam account is actually old enough to vote itself at this point. I don’t see where “challenging” me will do anytihng but force me to provide an attack surface

So you admit you’re just attacking what you see as nearby targets?

Rather than argue over building tolerance and strategems, we could simply not barbecue the planet?

So people are upset about this, but have no trouble with the government tracking where they are and what they are doing 24x7x365.

What are you basng the back half of that statement on? The people complaining about these glasses are also the ones complaining about overreach and surveillance because they are the same thing.

Do you live your entire life in reaction to other people? It sounds exhausting.

Ridiculous stance

It really looks like you are needing to unload - which I get it, you were failed miserably by the system and it’s ruined your life. But you’re unloading in inappropriate ways.

This is brutal but I am always very …curious about men who see a post about systemic violence against women and interject their own stories about how they’re the victim. What is the purpose?

bud, give it up. You made stupid comments.

Right, but the original thread wasn’t discussing history, was it? That was a goal post move.

More than one thing can be correct. And in this case, the Israelis and US do not need to be in Iran, but this does not negate the ridiculousness of making a comment like “Don’t you think indiscriminate bombing, genocide, and child sex trafficking are a bigger problem?” when both sides commit these exact crimes.

true, but I don’t see how that actually answers the question posited. Iran has committed numerous human rights violations on their accord. They shot over thirty six thousand of their own people in January.

I do not think you are equipped to be telling people that.

I have zero interest in communicating with a transphobe

Numerous responses to it indicate otherwise.

“Biological reality” in this context is extremely bad faith wording that refuses to accept the malleability of gender.

No one is buying it.

saying so is very much bigotry, no matter how much you dislike people calling you out on your bullshit

Oh dear. Please don’t try that martyred crap. There is a very clear line of conversational progression here and you literally said "It’s not bigotry for women to be uncomfortable around men in women only space. "

Tenderizer literally called transwomen men. That’s pretty textbook bigotry. Not sure what you’re complaining about here, apart from the fact that Taleya called it what it was.

You seem to keep going on about the “concerns” of women who are “uncomfortable”

Why are they uncomfortable? And why are you enabling it?

How on EARTH did you get “racist against the troops!!!” out of an aboriginal protocol welcoming people to an ANZAC ceremony?

i get you’re arguing in bad faith but that’s some spectacular gymnastics.