Johnathan V Last made a good point about this tweet I hadn’t thought of.
This was always the most comfortable way to oppose Trumpism: By claiming that it would, necessarily, lead to electoral defeat. Comfortable because it involved no sacrifice. It made a purely utilitarian case against Trump’s authoritarianism. Trumpism is bad because it will cause our party to get destroyed.
It’s also the weakest challenge to Trumpism. Because what happens if Trump doesn’t result in electoral defeat for Republicans? Does that make it good?
Obviously, for Graham, the answer was an easy “yes.” Graham had no objective standards for morality. For him, right and wrong flowed from results. When Trump won the presidency, it meant that Graham had been—by his own definition—wrong about Trumpism.



















Can you tell me what the AI system was specifically, how it failed, and why the operators didn’t catch it? The article is paywalled, AI is a broad term that can mean a lot of things, so I’m legitimately trying to understand the failures here.
I’m assuming you read the article. Or else your just apeing “AI bad” and assuming someone said “hey chatgpt what should I blow up?” In which case I guess nevermind.