they/them/their/theirs/themself
Want to be a misogynist? Go to Hexbear! Just make sure you’re talking to a pup-girl first so you have plausible deniability and can complain that you aren’t being interpreted charitably enough for your blatant misogyny.
@staowolin@lemmygrad.ml only has two comments.
DPRK IS THE ONLY KOREA, IMPERIALISTS CONTINUE TO OCCUPY THE SOUTHERN REGION OF DPRK
Couldn’t find the second quote, but it’s when I noticed that this got xposted a bunch a little over a year ago
Couldn’t find the 3rd either.
While I don’t think this is about anything I posted, if you (or anyone else) do ever feel like I’ve failed to add a content warning to a post or comment that needs it, I’d appreciate knowing.
Heartbreaking: Bullshit On My New Feed
No experiencio
The “deleted by creator” tag and missing profile page are because the account was deleted.
I would guess that lemmy.zip doesn’t like mutual aid.
Abolish DHS
Abolish America
Abolish DHS
Abolish America
Always disappointing to see stonetoss comic edits.
You can just choose not to use stonetoss comics.
Labels are, imo, mostly a shorthand that help identify people with common interests, experiences, goals, etc. I don’t think most people solely identify with a label so much as use them as a means to find people who they’re more likely to find interesting (or not).
Identifying as a g*mer certainly lacks nuance - there’s many genres of games and different people are going to be interested in different ones. People who primarily play sports games or board games probably aren’t as likely to choose that label as people who play shooters, sure, so there’s some implicit nuance about the types of games someone plays when they label themselves that way, but it still provides a jumping off point for someone to determine a level of overlap exists with someone else.
I think that people who identify as one thing are actually pretty rare - people don’t really define their entire selves from a single label, they collect the ones that somewhat fit well enough to make sense to most other people, while signaling to the people who share a given one that there are common interests that could be fun to delve into further together and figure out to what extent they truly are or aren’t shared interests.
I do think labels can be harmful and thought-terminating, but I don’t think they’re inherently so. They can be used to other or marginalize a group of people, yes, but IMO that’s not behavior that’s driven by the people who find that label resonates with them.
Communists act like there’s a simple solution here, but corporations are people and money is speech so if you stop the trolley you’re an authoritarian who wants to take away 
I have a hard time telling your lowercase Ls and Es apart. Even knowing what site this is on I kept reading eemmygrad.me