I remember seeing these in the 2000s on road trips - real cell tower, fake tree for camouflage

YouTube’s a big place

I do not recognize the bodies in the water

I have 4 characters (past and present) that all occupy the same “party role” for this reason. They each have their own back stories sure, but their decision-making process is essentially the same because it’s how I would solve that given problem. The same set of equations, just with different source data.

I hadn’t thought about over-exaggeeating a trait before to differentiate them, I may have to use that trick going forward.

Typically the same level of permissions needed to load drivers - which if they’re attacking the system using custom out of date drivers is relevant.

Having users and services at least privileges is one step of attack surface area reduction, but the “better” solution is to make sure that revocation check is enabled and that the compromised cert is revoked by its issuer. Or if it’s an old, unused root, you can ban that root at the machine level.

“The only difference between science and [messing] around is writing stuff down”

From memory I can only answer one of those: The way I understand it (and I could be wrong), your programs theoretically should only need modifications if they have a concurrency related bug. The global interlock is designed to take a sledgehammer at “fixing” a concurrency data race. If you have a bug that the GIL fixed, you’ll need to solve that data race using a different control structure once free threading is enabled.

I know it’s kind of a vague answer, but every program that supports true concurrency will do it slightly differently. Your average script with just a few libraries may not benefit, unless a library itself uses threads. Some libraries that use native compiled components may already be able to utilize the full power of you computer even on standard Python builds because threads spawned directly in the native code are less beholden to the GIL (depending on how often they’d need to communicate with native python code)

TIL that exists, I thought you were talking about an actual flippy disk (lower case) until I got here.

The could be using .js and .py files directly as config files and letting the language interpreter so the heavy lifting. Just like ye olde config.php.

And yes this absolutely will allow code injection by a config admin.

Does that still happen if you use the merge unrelated histories option? (Been a minute since I last had to use that option in git)

fail2ban isn’t a WAF?

Kupo? [Woop woop woooop]

^ this

As an example of scale, my company has an entire IT team of a handful of people for managing such an environment for a thousand or so devs and engineers.

Isn’t venmo owned by PayPal for the past 10y?

The average damage on that is 45… Konsi OP

I wondered if someone would post that second one.

For the first, I think Square Enix got it right - headphones light the right image, but with the bridge between the ear cups flopped back on their head.

Alternatively, you could have headphones like the first but with the drivers in the upper cat ear portion by their actual ears.

OT but am I the only one that noticed the fox’s headphones aren’t on their ears?

Biblically accurate roadrunner wasn’t on the list of things I was expecting to see today

Looks AI generated - wonky fingers on kitty’s right hand (left of image) and a partial cat face on their left index (right of image)

Where I went to college, they probably didn’t directly have the key, that’d have to go through maintenance. But one of the things you signed on to initially was for maintenance to enter if they needed to while you were out.

Plus, at least half of the WAPs were actually in rooms and not hallways, so to service the network beyond IDF problems they’d have to get in