I actually used Chicago95 for a bit and I really liked it, but for some reason the Wayland beta doesn’t work on my PC yet and I can’t tolerate the weird quirks X11 has with my GPU drivers :(
- 4 Posts
- 21 Comments
Thanks! When I was a kid, I remember I figured out how to change the font in Windows and I spent a long time messing around with it and settled on Comic Sans MS. Turns out I also have mild dyslexia, so might be part of why I like it!
Tough question! On the one hand, I’ve never been misled by a markdown document, but on the other hand, it’s the new kid on the block, and doesn’t have anywhere near the same amount of traction as
.txt, the academic distinction of.tex, nor the clout of .xlsx. As an aside, I think Randall overvalues PDF here. I think I’d put.mdjust above.doc, but below.xlsx.
drake@lemmy.sdf.orgOPto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Linux rules! How do you like my desktop?
0·8 months agoYes it is! The theme is called Reactionary Plus.
drake@lemmy.sdf.orgOPto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Linux rules! How do you like my desktop?
0·8 months agoYep, it’s Dolphin with the Reactionary Plus theme
drake@lemmy.sdf.orgOPto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Linux rules! How do you like my desktop?
0·8 months agoIt’s Audacious, an open source media player which can actually use Winamp skins directly. It’s awesome, I love it. Give it a shot if you’d like, you can get it for Windows, Linux and Mac, and you can use any of the skins from the Winamp Skin Museum.
This is just fucking misogyny. If the best insult you can think of against Elon Musk is to call him a woman, then you just hate women. Anyone who thinks this is actually good, you are part of the problem, just go vote for fucking Trump
Notice how pro-nuclear people always point towards a bunch of fictional technology as the solution? Oh, we just need fusion, or breeder reactors, or a bunch of other shit that doesn’t exist. No, bro, we just need to build renewables and proper energy grids. It’s really not that complicated. If it’s not sunny where you live, then you just get electricity from where it is sunny. It’s really really simple
Nuclear energy is a solution looking for a problem. Total tech bro bullshit. Like crypto.
Are you fucking serious? Nuclear power plants cost way fucking more than some cables. You people are fundamentally so unserious. Pull your head out of a reactor for ten seconds and take reality as it exists
and breeder reactors are more expensive than faerie magic, I prefer to use technologies that are actually real rather than things I wish were real
There is a huge lobby of pro-nuclear think tanks who try to astroturf pro-nuclear shit onto social media. We, scientifically literate, rational people, need to counteract these harmful narratives with some facts.
FACT: Renewable sources of energy are as cheap or cheaper per kwh than nuclear.
FACT: Renewables are faster to provision than nuclear.
FACT: Renewables are as clean, or cleaner, than nuclear.
FACT: Renewables are much more flexible and responsive to energy fluctuations than nuclear.
FACT: Renewables will only get cheaper. Nuclear will only get more expensive, because uranium mining will get harder and harder as we deplete easily accessible sources.
Nuclear isn’t in competition with fossil fuels, it’s in competition with renewables. Renewables are better than nuclear by pretty much every conceivable metric. So fuck nuclear power, it’s a waste of money and time.
When energy storage and transmission methods are also not up to the task, nuclear becomes the best answer.
Obviously, the best answer is to improve energy storage and transmission infrastructure. Why would we waste hundreds of millions on a stupid toy power plant when we could spend 10% of that money on just running decent underground cables.
drake@lemmy.sdf.orgto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•The amount of people your age is only going down with time.
0·2 years agoGreat news, this isn’t actually true!
Okay, well, the number of people alive the exact same number of years as you is gonna go down. But that number is arbitrary and doesn’t matter.
The thing is as you get older the difference between you and people younger/older than you gets smaller and smaller. You’ve probably noticed that as you get older you can form relationships more easily with people even years older/younger than yourself.
As you get older, more potential friendships and relationships open up to you, until you’re well into old age.
Again, I totally get your point, and I think it’s a worthwhile conversation to have, but that’s not really what I’m here to talk about - I’m just trying to explain what happened in the comment thread, why people got upset, and how we can avoid that so that we can have open and productive conversations about these really sensitive topics without upsetting people.
The reality is that women so often have to deal with men trying to control their sexuality, so when we’re talking about these topics in good faith, we really need to be extra cautious that we’re handling these topics delicately and respectfully.
Thanks again for the reply - I think I understand your point, which I think is genuinely interesting and worthy of discussion, but there is just something about the phrasing that feels off to me, and just to be clear, I’m sure it’s unintentional. I’m sure we can both agree that we would always want to make everyone feel safe, respected and valued, but sometimes we can accidentally say (or write) things in a way that come across in a way that we don’t intend.
In my opinion, talking about women ‘withholding’ sex as a ‘punishment’ implies a certain level of expectation or entitlement, like men are entitled to have sex with women and if they don’t have sex then they’re punishing men. This is something that I think a lot of us sort of struggle to recognise as harmful, because we all are human and we know that we all have a need for sex, both men and women - but historically, this kind of framing, that men are entitled to sex with women. has been used to excuse violent sexual crimes
There’s totally a valid conversation to be had about how effective this movement could be, but I think that it’s really important that men like myself need to start from a place of recognising that our behaviour can be really hurtful to women, even when we don’t intend it to be, and that we listen to them when they tell us that we can make really simple small changes to protect their humanity, make them feel safe and valued, and recognise the part that we all play - consciously and unconsciously - in the system that has mistreated women for longer than we can possibly fathom.
Hello, thanks for your reply, I appreciate that we can have a civil conversation about a topic that can be quite heated. I’m a man, so I definitely can’t speak for women, but I try my best to listen, and I can try to pass on what I’ve learned!
You’re totally right that nobody in the screenshot wrote the words “men are owed sex by women”, but if you’ll give me the benefit of the doubt, I think there’s something a little deeper at play here, and I think it really depends on your perspective.
Rather than explain it directly, it might be easier to use an example - let’s say that you have a friend who you don’t want to have sex with. If that friend is really nice to you, and you don’t have sex with them, are you punishing them?
If that friend said something like, “You know, if you don’t have sex with us, we might become more violent and dangerous…” how do you think that would make you feel?
Personally, I would feel a bit scared by that sort of statement - I feel that it’s coercive, and it has a kind of veiled threat of violence there that makes me uncomfortable.
I hope that helps explain why some people might read the message differently from how you read it.
link, please?Edit: found it.
Seems like pretty typical self-centred reply-guy behaviour, then all the men downvoting got annoyed because the person fighting on behalf of women in this interaction refused to entertain the implication that men are owed sex by women
drake@lemmy.sdf.orgto
memes@lemmy.world•Corporations are not your Friends: A Story in Two Parts
0·2 years agoThey’re lying to themselves. Probably some small part of them cares about supporting creators, but it’s not their main motivation.
drake@lemmy.sdf.orgto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•We lost another real one.....English
0·2 years agoI mean, yeah. Why are people even bothering with piracy on regular, HTTP, web sites? Of course it’ll get taken down, and legal action taken against the owner.
We need to teach the younger generations how to torrent shit





I loooove KolourPaint, I’ve wanted a program that’s just like the classic MS Paint for such a long time, I was so thrilled when I found it. Only available for Linux users unfortunately