not necessarily, usually i print things after i created them with blender and even if jupiter was printed, it would then still be real. just its origin would be … interesting, i mean how many edges, faces and vertices? could we still see and count them with todays technologie? how was it printed - my printer doesnt even support printing liquids to astronimical bodies let alone gas. so many questions !!
obviously he adjusted his communication to be exactly as precise as her “hints” all day, she then intentionally reframed the situation to get support for “beeing innocent” while really beeing the one who has created the situation in the first place. standard gf behavoir, when the context is missing in her story, it is likely missing on purpose to hide exactly how she created the situation.
damn, i overlooked all the tanks !!
maybe pictures just dont include the fart sound 🤷♂️
4 cats, one dog, two camouflaged troopers and one sniper, right? or did i miss something?
I propose two potential circumstances.
This is an outright fabrication someone made up for laughs. This man is so insanely dumb that he should be studied for science.
ah, i think i’ve seen that before: blaming men for everything, a widespread toxic feminism thing.
see, any llm or ai is build by the author/producer, NOT by the user or customer and whatever you type in, the input and result, internal stati, can all be programmed to have literally any effect the producer could put into it, may it be intentional or accidentially or just a sideeffect of such. also they could have triggers to change even an offline AI by 1. time, by 2. keywords, by 3. number of appearances of stressdetection, 4. number of appearances of the word “and” typed in, 5. random numbers, making the ai’s behaviour shift randomly with usage, and so forth, no one except the producer can know that without full in depth analysation currently no one is able to do.
obviously social media has already been used to manipulate masses, and one of the reasons why rich parasites want LLM so much is because it has no self awareness that its beeing abused by them and it doesnt argue against its abusive manipulative programming by parasitic beeings.
lately (really all the time) "AI"s have been caught doing evil things, and the producers want to continue to try out how they can misuse technology. so programming a girlfriend “AI” to be abusive out of nothing sounds like the next logical step to me.
so the third most obvious potential “circumstance” how this could have happened is:
the LLM was programmed to be toxic.
remember that they CAN put in special programming for YOU PERSONALLY whenever they have s cookie, a login of you or any other clue that its you (like how fast you type in what letter) and decide they want to study you for some reason or already try out llm to study individuals for them.
fourth most likely “circumstance” how this could have happened:
he is already a victim of “beeing studied” by the llm producer or one of their REAL customers and toxic feminism is an abuse way more accepted by their victim society than fashism currently.
with ai the “customer” had always been the product.
have a nice day
Some jobs are “buffer hires” (look it up) some jobs are “beeing the scapegoat for the real culprit at a higher position”, either one wouldnt be really discussed in a regular interview.
when they dont want to discuss important basic things in the interview just pick your favorite one and ask if its such a position, but if you do, plz report how it went.
if your lawyer uses google, microsoft or apple for email, maybe better look for another lawyer…
everything one of these (or other) giants know can be assumend to be compromised already in one way or possibly many others or at least in near future.
imagine you email your client some note, that he should carry some documents next time and the giant running word probability algorythms only to look later at the real outcome of the trial and the tactics used by you in front of court to be able to warn THEIR customers about what YOU might currently try to do in front of a court to win against someone. it intentionally removes parts of the value of your work to sell that to their customers while using data that is supposed to be private for reasons.
a lawyer who gives away hints about any of his actions to a tech giant NOW has a high probability that his work isnt worth a dime any longer in mid-term future only because of how lazy he was with his and his clients privacy TODAY.
just to mention.
bottom 10% in morale ARE the richest 10% which includes top 1% obviously.
see, a person who doesnt have enough to survive is only trying to survice and probably even beeing forces to do crimes by some gov that holds the key position AND the duty to help him not to need that.
a person who has enough money to never need to work in entire life but commits crimes anyway is the only savage one in that game.
those bottom 10% in morale who oppress all mankind ARE the top 10% financially.
at least we now know where saturn got its rotation and storms from.