Changing the party doesn’t always mean opting for a worse solution and letting the disadvantaged people bear the consequences of your discipline. You can always choose a better option like the Green party, which obviously the electors didn’t.
A snap election was a silly miscalculation. It was the electors who individually made the choice.
I also think there’s no ethical problem. But the latter part seems to be completely legal (so it’s specific to a country’s laws) rather than ethical, which I also agree with.
Why do you think it’s a reliance (without it things will break) rather than a substitutable service?
How about the old contributors using AI to assist coding? Is that ethical?
It’s alarming what they are lobbying about. But is there an indication in the page specific to Linux or LibreOffice?
It happened before the attack
Call it hypocrisy or not, it would help the people in China. And now, a Chinese organization is calling for action. Ignoring an opportunity to do the right thing won’t make you look less hypocritical, but more.
It’s not even open source. Being in Europe doesn’t automatically grant you the privacy, let alone the free software rights.
That patch is manually added. Moreover, some apps have hard binding with their id, making the situation more complicated. Kiwi is not on f-droid at all. They host their own version. It might be easier for the app authors to do it. But f-droid maintainers don’t have this capacity.
The thing is that changing the app id requires too much patching to thousands of apps, and the users will not be able to migrate from the current f-droid version.
Because treaty rights are parallel to human rights
Good to know that they have first-class Linux support.
Critics have also warned that the government could issue directives compelling companies to weaken or bypass encryption tools. The CCSPA does not prohibit such orders (McMillan, at para 3).
Unlike NIS2, which places significant emphasis on transparency, institutional accountability, and harmonized enforcement through national authorities, Bill C-8 consolidates authority within the federal Cabinet and delegates sweeping powers to the Minister without creating any independent regulatory body.
Although the exact wording hasn’t been released, the news coverage says
To avoid infringing Charter rights, the source said, there would be an exemption so people can advocate and protest as long as it’s lawful.
So unlike the Ontario one, it see that protests are not prohibited?
For those who haven’t read the article, the suggested solution is for advertisers to obtain similar user IDs by using their own user list; it has nothing to do with gathering user data from the browser.
It is utilized in conjunction with other differential privacy technologies that gather user information and classify users.
In fairness, Mozilla needs a means of making money if anyone hopes Firefox or Librewolf to exist in the long run.
Both have their roles and their corresponding fair shares