Yeah I would say it’s pretty good at catching most mistakes the majority of the time, it’s just the few times when it does make a mistake that I’m not sure is a mistake or not, it’ll argue in a way that seems plausible and forces me to rethink and verify the code that was already correct. I probably still save time with it, but it can be incredibly annoying and time consuming when it fails.
This is called the nirvana fallacy. Yes you can go forever and you should reduce your consumption as much as possible. That doesn’t mean I have to buy the specifically really loud animal-terrifying cabinet shaking wake people up who have work tomorrow variety of fireworks, and that doesn’t give my neighbor carte-blanche to do whatever they want no matter how much it bothers me. It’s possible to do better without doing perfect.
They said can we stop over dramatizing it, which is minimizing other peoples experience of being startled, scared, or in cases of ptsd actually terrified. It’s like if I said “I was in a car crash and was fine, can we stop the dramatization of car crashes?”
This is a great article on this topic
https://issendai.com/psychology/estrangement/when-the-missing-reasons-arent-missing/
It sucks because it’s like sitting there holding up a leaning pile of bricks, and you know as soon as you move it’s falling, but you only have 1 life and you deserve to spend it doing more than fixing other people’s mistakes.
It’s only really good if you are totally confident in what is and is not a mistake though, as it’ll do things like replace a struct with an int and be like “use a vec of indices and access the actual array with that since it’s smaller to copy and pass around!” when you have no need to copy and pass it around, and it basically created a layer of indirection for no reason.
It’ll then make up some reason as to why you DO need to pass it around and copy it, so you have to be REALLY sure about what the code should be doing.
I’m always curious what the differences are between this and balanced annihilation, they both seem very similar but BA feels a bit more polished
I think people forget a lot of the people who work on it are still super passionate people so it’s still gonna be good.
As do metal soda cans to keep them from corroding
I have the most off-putting personality imaginable and I still get a ton of attention from women because I’m tall. It just won’t keep peoples attention more than a good personality will.
Youre right I don’t think it’s correct at all to call it a genocide. I think they’re just hypersensitive to the minimizing language tankies use a lot, where a lot of historians said “the uyghur genocide” and tankies say “uhm technically there was no mention of genocide from this international rights body so that’s an overreaction.” The implication being that sure it’s not good what’s happening to them, but it’s not THAT bad.
Tankies do a similar thing with Ukraine where they say “they’re just taking back some of the land they rightfully control,” or some other minimization.
It just has the toxic “intellectual” redditors since that’s the instance that was recommended most, but it’s not the majority of the users, just the highest concentration of them.
This reminded me of this article on signaling, probably the most interesting article I’ve seen posted on lemmy. Plus it has this great collection of definitely not made up words.
“it” amen brother. 21:51 she’s on screen with the special cam, she leaves for 2 minutes to drink water at about 2 hours then she’s back till ~3 hours.
Yes they might yelp, but the dejected walking is exactly how every dog I’ve ever been around reacts when punished. Put that with him having a remote that looks identical to a shock collar remote and Kaya sitting in 1 spot for 3 hours out of a 4 hour stream daily. Why doesn’t he just show the model? If the proof to clear something up was “move an object in front of a camera” and they refused to do it, how is that a conspiracy to say “well they won’t do something incredibly simple to prove they’re innocent that’s kind of telling” ??
It’s possible the dog got startled by him moving his arm. I have never seen a dog get startled and then dejectedly walk over to It’s sleeping spot, and I’ve been around dogs my entire life and that is EXACTLY how a dog who has just been punished reacts. The dog yelps right as he moves his hand and he has a remote that looks identical to a shock collar remote. It is possible there are explanations for all that, it just seems incredibly unlikely to me.
Weird that he never mentioned that ever, never showed the remote before to clear it up in 5 seconds, never showed any evidence of what he was actually using besides waving a “vibration” collar (that was shown to be a shock collar, weird how he won’t show the model printed on it). If everything points to something, I am more likely to believe that, when the work required to prove it false takes 2 seconds. I guess that’s too high a bar though hey?
The line is arbitrary but “have things that sound like explosions for 2 weeks that might happen at any point for 24 hours a day that causes massive stress to animals and some people” should be crossing that line. Same for the animal industry and supporting AI when the data centers are causing huge issues.
I think almost anyone would agree if there was a set firework show, that lasted 30 minutes to an hour, and no other explosive fireworks outside the show (sparklers etc are totally fine), you would have 1/100th the people complaining. I am not personally massively affected by fireworks but I don’t think that’s an unfair compromise at all.