• Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      sometime who buys a toilet and then finds out afterwards that they were sold a toilet that only flushes with an app

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This. SO many devices, especially networking stuff. It seems like they should just do their thing after plugging in and setting a few settings. “It’s so EZ!” says the box.

        Nope, “scan this code to get this app, make an account, agree to all the things, register for spam…”

        It’s disgusting.

      • Grunt4019@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What do house guests do?

        “Let me know when you’re done and I can flush the toilet though the app.”

        Or

        “Download this app to flush the toilet once at my house.”

        • Match!!@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          the host just watches them through the built in camera and the house guest thinks it flushes automatically :)

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Ok, Richard, I’m done.”

            “Yeah, I got the notification actually. Heavy dinner last night?”

            “What the actual fuck, Richard?”

            • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah. I’m absolutely opposed to unnecessarily “smart” devices.

              I have a strong aversion to voice activated anything. Smartphones have had voice assistant’s since forever but whenever I’ve tried it I just find it to be a clunky awkward imprecise user interface.

              Why do something in a few clicks when 10 minutes of miscommunication will do?

              In-house toilet facilities are more or less a solved problem. These idiots un-solved it.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The more I hear from big tech companies the more I want to reject it. I don’t even own a printer.

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Go for older laser printers. They’re bulletproof, cheap on toner, free of DRM, and even if they only come with an LPT port you can always build your own print server that gives you all the bells and whistles like AirPrint.

          • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            literally so you can leave it unplugged in a box, and drag it out once a year to print a tax form or something. Toner should be shelf stable.

              • PNW clouds@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I have a 70+ year old friend that paper files. She doesn’t trust the free file places available here (USA). I don’t blame her.

                Ysk - You can order the forms for free on the IRS (& state) websites.

                I print things for her on my 1999 laser jet if she needs something printed.

                Many years I paper filed just to inconvenience them slightly for not offering free file.

                • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I am British, most people don’t need to even think about taxes here as its all automatic. Only really something you might need to look at if you are self employed or its your job to deal with it.

          • YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because they are like two fifty on the flea market and will run on one cartridge for 10 years. I print all my tickets everytime, I’m that old

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can confirm. I’m a tech worker. No smart devices. Laser printer. Very close to going back to a flip phone.

          I am looking at some smart locks, but they’re able to be used as dumb locks with PIN code and physical key also. And they have a usb power port on the outside you could plug a battery into.

          I’ve gone down the smart home route a decade ago and only did non-cloud integrated devices with physical controls also. But it’s a part time hobby to maintain it.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            usb power port on the outside you could plug a battery into.

            Until someone with a flipper figures out that port transfers data too, lmao.

          • rekabis@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            flip phone

            Almost all such phones are actually smart phones in a flip phone Edgar Suit. Especially if it has maps or YouTube or any kind of an App Store. I see a crapton of flip phones that run Android, which has all sorts of Google spyware piggybacking along.

            I think there may be only two or three dumb flip phones or feature flip phones left on the market, and IIRC two are locked to specific networks.

            If you want a bona-fide dumb phone, you might be limited to something like the rotary un-smartphone.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Go check in Aliexpress: there are tons of non-smart phones, especially the stuff marked as “senior phone”, and they’re pretty cheap too (like $15 for a mobile phone that just does calls and SMS).

              If you want the stuff that’s not glitzy and heavy on marketing you need to get it from where the factories are, not were the brands are - basic mobile phone tech is a thoroughly solved problem and highly integrated nowadays and well within range for even smallish electronics manufacturers to design themselves.

              Also check HMD, the Finnish mobile maker who bought Nokia’s mobile business, who also have several non-smart models (including old Nokia models).

              Edit: No idea if any are flip-phones though. Here’s an example flip phone

            • spookex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I had a Sharp SH-03L for a while, it’s a business version of one of their flip phones that didn’t even have a camera.

              The OS was actually android 8.0 but really stripped down to basically only do the whatever apps a flip phone has.

              I was able to sideload apks through ADB, but ironically, I actually wanted the google stuff to work since a lot of the apps required it to log in and other things.

              The thing was pretty cheap though, paid like $15 for it

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          build your own print server that gives you all the bells and whistles like AirPrint.

          …why? CUPS is print server. You don’t need anything else.

    • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s one guy in my department who does all the smart home shit, but I absolutely don’t see the point in it. Didn’t even connect the washing machine to the wi-fi as you can’t set it going without having loaded it first anyway.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I could see having lights on a somewhat sophisticated timer. Like having bedroom lighting that simulates dawn, fades on etc. Maybe making a thermostat a little bit more sophisticated. I’d like to live in a world where I could trust the power company to tell me when electricity is abundant and scarce but we’re gonna have to win Civil War 2 before we get that. My toilet and faucets do not need any digital technology at all.

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      About 3-4 years ago I took a bit of a dive into the firmware of IoT devices. The utter lack of security and the amount of information being hoovered up to the mothership made me swear to never build anything “smart” into the renovations of my current home. Sure, there will be automation. There will be CCTV. There will be solar with battery backup for essentials. There will be conveniences of all kinds. But virtually all will be air gapped, incapable of remote rooting, and under my full control.

      Hell, even my laser printers are HP models over two decades old - an HP 4050DTN and an HP 5000DTN - that are totally devoid of any DRM or “smart features” and can trivially take generic overstuffed cartridges that can do 20,000 sheets at 5% coverage.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        ZigBee and Z-wave create their own network not connected to the internet, pair that with Home Assistant 🇪🇺 and done, sane smart home implementation.

        • rekabis@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Will have to look into that, thanks.

          One of my key implementation requirements, however, will be resiliency, which means simplicity will be a core feature. The more “moving parts”, the easier it will be to break.

      • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I worked for Cisco during the time IoT was being pushed into everything. You don’t want to know how bad it is. If I was malicious I could have easily written several backdoors into their products without anyone knowing. I wrote kernel code in their IOS operating system. There are no checks on that shit and the entire switching team does next to zero peer review on kernel security.

        Yes, there products that (at the time) touched upwards of 95% of all packets sent over the Internet.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The only upside to this state of things is that it keeps alive my fantasies of one day being a Watchdogs-style techno-sorcerer that can wirelessly hack anything that runs on electrons and a WiFi signal.

        … Although the nightmare is that people far more evil can probably already do that.

      • PNW clouds@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there a community for those of us with late 90s early 2000 HP laserjets? Somewhere we can discuss maintenance, feeding, and overall care?

        • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There used to be but the moderators forgot to sign up for HP Smart® Instant Ink™ and used non-authorized ink (first party ink ordered directly from HPs website) so it got shut down 😔

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS

        I will bulk purchase grey-market bootleg toner from shady overseas websites before I go back to a inkjet…

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like the beginning of the Cory Doctorow novella “Unauthorized Bread.” Cloud service goes down and the main character’s toaster won’t work without them.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Maybe it needs a connection cause it takes a picture of your feces and sends it to an AI analysis service. If anomalies are detected, it tells you that you should take the stool sample to a laboratory for further study, then lets you flush. Poof, smart toilet. I could see people with too much money buying this.

    Edit: Thought about it some more… why stop at feces images? Why not also have a high resolution camera pointed at your anus taking crowning shots and analyzing those. Tell users if anythings wrong. The future is bright brown boys. The future is brown.

    Edit2: You could even have motion based security… alert if anyone broke in through your bathroom. Cameras in toilets people! What could go wrong?

    Edit3: Hear me out. User controlled bidet mode + anus camera. Take out your phone and clean your ass in first person. Score points if you clean your whole ass and compete on an online scoreboard. Tech sure is amazing.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no reason it needs an always on connection for this. Even if there was a camera in the bowl taking pictures of poo (which raises so many privacy questions), the device could easily save hundreds of HD+ quality picture (assuming a toilet camera had that resolution) and send them next time connection is secure.

      Always online functionality only makes sense when the function itself is an online task such as a video call or looking up information not saved locally.

      Having an always online connection for a toilet suggest it’s gathering much more information passively from your home, using voice activated as a cover to always be listening and thus relaying what it records to server/data center to be filtered through for marketable or exploitable data.

      • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Toilet’s chipset is only good for network connection and video recording. Business logic is on servers. As I said, users want to know if their shit is good before they flush so they dont lose a sample in case it is bad.

        You may have stumbled on multiplayer shitting though. Conference call with random strangers on the internet, biggest splashback, fastest bowel movement… endless possibilities. Yeah I think always online is the best course of action here.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If anomalies are detected, it tells your insurance company so they can increase your rates or drop you before you actually need to go to the hospital and cost them any money.

      ftfy

      • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry, Euro defaultism… my healthcare is affordable. You can always run Tolet Assistant on a raspberry pi at home and let your shit never leave the network.

    • CrateDane@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why not just have a small aliquot of each stool deposit diverted into an HPLC/UPLC with AI checking the chromatogram?

  • contrapunctus@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair.

    Douglas Adams

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If one day there is only smart toilets, I will go shit in the woods and start to live like an animal. Clearly humanity was a mistake and we should return to monke

        • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Introducing the Smart Catholic. Track your Hail Marys from the convenience of your phone, and add more with a simple tap. Subscribe to one of our new pergatory plans today, 3 months half price when you buy your Smart Catholic!

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem isn’t necessarily smart toilets. The problem is companies attempting to have complete control over the product and ensuring that their products do not function without dependency on their infrastructure.

      There is no functional reason to have a toilet connect to an outside server. There are no functional reasons to have many of these smart devices require outside dependencies. But their profits and their subscription models definitely benefit from being able to remotely disable features.

      Technology is garbage not because we’ve gone too far with Technology. Technology is garbage because of capitalism.

      • OccultIconoclast@reddthat.comBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is no functional reason to have a toilet connect to an outside server

        So that all the toilets you poop in can share data on your poops and get a complete picture of your bowel health.

        • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sounds like an anxiety inducing app. And I thought sleep tracking was anxiety inducing. Imagine getting a notification that you might have ass cancer.

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anything in my house smarter than the IKEA remote control light switch gets crushed with a hammer.

    • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same, the only thing talkings to the internet are my reverse proxy and the security cameras (only when viewing them from outside the local network, quite like what reolink does there)

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, you could just use smarter stuff that’s open source and has local API, or do what I do and build your own devices where you can ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I don’t hate the idea of smart-ish devices, if they’re not cloud-dependent in any way and have some kind of manual override.

        It’s kind of painful to have a kitchen full of devices each implementing their own half-assed OSs separately, or even more than once in one device.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a wifi-enabled garage door opener whose manufacturer discontinued the Google Home connection for so that you have to use their app and see their Amazon or Walmart ads. I also have a wifi-enabled alarm system whose manufacturer apparently doesn’t care about Matter integration or whatever. So leaving the house in my car requires the use of two different apps (three if I also need to turn off lights).

          In actuality I just use the physical buttons. But there was a time that I had a beautiful dream of getting a smart lock and setting my house up to lock the doors, close the garage door, and arm the alarm when I pushed a button in the car–and, more importantly, undo all of those things in reverse when I got home.

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even there though, what is the actual point of a phone app controlled smart toilet, even if you open sourced the whole thing? Unlocking one’s phone and tapping the app icon, and then presumably a button on the app, is going to take more time than one press of a lever that one is right next to anyway, and the latter doesn’t present as many points of failure.

        • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok maybe the flushing part is a bit overkill and mostly a joke, but a toilet that can deliver notifications like if it’s clogged for example before you use it and make it worse would have fantastic utility IMO

          • mj_marathon@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            This makes zero sense. If it’s clogged, you’d know beforehand when you look in the bowl. Why the would anyone need a notification for that?

            The ONLY utility that I could see here is if the notification logged who did the clogging so you could give them shit.

            • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Toilets can appear to have flushed fully, but still have…material…stuck in the U-bend that hasn’t completely evacuated the toilet. A subsequent flush won’t work, even though the water in the bowl is clean.

              Ask me how I know.

              That said, this could almost certainly be better-solved in other ways. Maybe by preventing the tank from refilling if there’s still something in the u-bend (then you’d know it needed attention because there’d be no water in it)?

              • mj_marathon@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago
                1. We don’t know that the toilet has this sensing capability.
                2. If it does, the actual fix is the same as if it were a regular toilet.

                This just isn’t an issue that needs technology as a solution.

                • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  125% agreed. I was responding only to “If it’s clogged, you’d know beforehand when you look in the bowl.” I think there’s potentially an engineering solution–a fluid dynamics engineering solution–but definitely not an app.

              • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                A little display or indicator light somewhere on the toilet itself would be better than connecting it to some IOT app

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess, but I’ve never heard of a toilet clogging before it’s used.

            There’s other better examples, though. Smart thermostats get plenty of use from the people I know with them. A fridge that tracks how long stuff has been inside would be dope. Smart lights have uses.

            • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Toilets can appear to have flushed fully, but still have…material…stuck in the U-bend that hasn’t completely evacuated the toilet. A subsequent flush won’t work, even though the water in the bowl is clean.

              Ask me how I know.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Well, I suppose it is the kind of system where a lot of weird non-deterministic things can happen.

                What kind of sensor are we thinking of here? Optical? I know it’s a real issue to find something that doesn’t foul or misread even in the simpler application of an RV septic tank.

                I wonder if you could just put a window in the U-bend for manual inspection. It’s supposed to be full of “clean” water most of the time anyway.

                • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, not to mention, adding any sort of electronic components to the thing would be dicey at best. A lot of bathrooms don’t even have power outlets anywhere near the toilet.

                  I’d prefer some sort of pressure-activated valve or something, but this is an engineering challenge that’s beyond my meager skills.

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have no interest in one, but playing devil’s advocate, some might consider it more sanitary since you don’t have to touch the toilet to flush and have the choice of not being near it, hopefully avoiding any spray.

          Also, if your guests use the restroom, you can startle them at any time.

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              That occurred to me while writing my comment, as well, and I don’t like the implications.

              I would imagine they have to ask you, yes. If the toilet can be flushed without authentication, they’d probably still have to ask you how.

              • boonhet@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Probably just the extra cost of linkage and maybe risk of tripping over it

              • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Designing foot-operated things tends to fly in the face of modern accessibility standards. Wheelchair users already have enough problems using public toilets.

                • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They can still have both. A foot pedal for those who want it, a standard handle for those who don’t or can’t. In fact, retrofitting existing handle-flush toilets to add foot pedals could make a lot of sense.

              • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I assume lack of demand. In your own home, you’d be keeping the handle clean, and public washrooms often use the touchless sensor types.

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, wouldn’t want to get bacteria on your hands a few seconds before washing your hands.

        • Walican132@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well if you read the product description it was to allow AI Bidet control. However they had not received funding for AI so it was outsourced to a team of laborers in India using cameras and joysticks.

          It also logged the consistency, frequency and matter samples from all BMs so you could make informed dedication opinions.

          Spoiler

          /s

      • wise_pancake@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Stuff like openWRT routers get a pass.

        If it has a local host API I would use it because it never has to connect to the internet.

        • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          People also just need to be more selective about where and how they automate.

          For example, I wanted my coffee to automatically start in the morning. So instead of buying a “smart” coffee maker, I bought the dumbest possible one and a smart switch. Now, no matter what happens with that switch, the worst that can happen is I have to manually hit a button to get coffee.

      • Walican132@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wish I was this smart. We really want to do a smart light show using Xlights but every time I try to learn it I feel so frankly dumb.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you tried our new Hammr and associated app? The smart tool that can analyze your work! Become more efficient! Compete with friends! Earn achievements! Track your heart rate! Now with several different modes…

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Day 3,801 of thanking God I was born a Luddite

    Anyone who thought their toilet would be improved by having an internet connection deserves this

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m kind of far away fyom being a luddite, senior software developer, codes for fun, builds electronic stuff with wifi etc.

      My toilet was built and installed before internet was invented and will not be changed for anything smart, neither is my toaster, dish washer, stove, locks, etc. etc. Ever. Over my dead body (if you want to be disinherited).

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure but I’m also all for innovating and watching these things fail. Isn’t there a value in letting dumb rich people with money waste their wealth on dumb ideas. It keeps them from doing things like buying Twitter

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, it could be. Imagine getting a push notification when it overflows. The lowest pipe in my house is a toilet. Luckily my wife was nearby but it could’ve gone worse if we didn’t see for a bit.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a job for water detectors, which I have no qualms about connecting to the internet. They have the added benefit of detecting leaky pipes as well

  • applemao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I go the extra mile to keep iot out of my life. Especially in cars , which is getting hard, but I figure my future cars I’ll likely retrofit something old. Newest I’ll tolerate is 2014, with no touchscreen.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My car is probably going to die soon and I’m going to have trouble replacing it with something that actually has physical controls, doesn’t have a massive annoying touch screen, doesn’t have LED headlights set blinds everybody driving towards me or walking their dogs, isn’t a compact crossover bloated to the size of an SUV from 20 years ago, and can fit 8 ft length of raw material in it.

      Or rather I’m going to have trouble replacing it with something that I like for a decent price that isn’t too old and isn’t a van. Not necessarily because vans suck, vans are great. But the good ones are expensive, even used

      • applemao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        In complete agreement. I hate crossovers so much.

        Have you looked at this wagons or Volvo wagons ? Or just a good old tacoma or tundra long box ?

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not many wagons left. Will probably end up looking at Volvos. Hopefully more reliable than Subaru, and they’re actually shaped like wagons.

          Was looking at old Rangers/B2000s for a while, but it doesn’t make any sense. And I know Tacomas are out of budget lol

          • applemao@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right, and subaru stupidly quit making the wrx wagon in 2014, no idea why. There’s also the appeal of early 2000s gm, dirt cheap and easy to fix. Like an 03 Tahoe. Just not good on gas. You can find some of those in an I5 though which is cool.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea I’m not using anything that requires an app. If there’s an app I can host myself I might use it but I won’t rely on anything that can’t be controlled manually. The place I rent now has ceiling fans that are controlled by remote and I fucking hate them. It uses a shitty up/down button that has a horrendous delay or both the light and fan. It’s all the frustration of using a pull chain with no improvement. I can’t even figure out how to get it to switch directions for winter.

    • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tech Enthusiasts: Everything in my house is wired to the Internet of Things! I control it all from my smartphone! My smart-house is bluetooth enabled and I can give it voice commands via alexa! I love the future!

      Programmers / Engineers: The most recent piece of technology I own is a printer from 2004 and I keep a loaded gun ready to shoot it if it ever makes an unexpected noise.

      Security technicians: takes a deep swig of whiskey I wish I had been born in the neolithic.

      • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Im studying the security stuff. The more you think about it, the more paranoid you become until you notice that your level of paranoia is far too high and try to ignore things.

        Firmwares everywhere are definitely spying on us. Or at leasty they could, and we wouldn’t really know it.