Thousands of users wanted it, so Firefox delivered it. Tab Groups are now live to help you declutter and stay organized while browsing.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Go to Settings > Design, and then under Tab Bar Style select “Vertical Tab Bar (experimental)”. I recommend checking the “Collapse Vertical Tab Bar” checkbox, too. That way, the tab bar collapses into icons when your cursor isn’t over it, taking up less window space.

    • bruce965@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I’ve started using vertical tabs in Firefox as soon as I got the notification. I never thought I would have liked them so much.

      Why are you asking for decent vertical tabs? Are they inferior to some other browser you have in mind?

      • flubba86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’ve been using the tree-style-tabs plugin for the last 4 years, because I like vertical tabs, and nesting it provides.

        But now that Firefox actually finally has proper vertical tabs, and tab groups, I can move away from tree-style-tabs (I don’t use any of its other features).

      • souperk@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I like Arc’s user experience with vertical tabs. They are bigger, easier to organize and they are cleaner. Also, the sidebar toggle is hard to work with, ideally I would prefer the ability to toggle with a shortcut or reveal on hover.

        Aside Arc, Zen browser has a good vertical tab experience.

        Overall, I still main firefox for my personal browser, though it’s UX is still lacking.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I wanted to like them but I dont know, I think they are more natural at the top still.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I’m going to stick it out for maybe a couple months (past this first ~month period) just to see if maybe they are superior somehow

        • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          The chrome tab groups were what I missed the most when I switched, so I’m happy with the change. It’s a little jankier feeling as in chrome it’s harder to drag a tab out of the group, while in Firefox if you move a tab to the end it’s hard to get it to stay in the group.

          It would also be nice if any of it was themeable, but themeability in Firefox is a whole other problem.

  • lapislazuli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Meh. The number of tabs I have open at any given time almost never exceeds six. If I don’t need em, I close em. I do make use of bookmark folders: I have three folders called ‘Today’, ‘Weekend’ and ‘Temp’, which is the order of going though websites I have saved. That way, I take action on every website I’ve added to those folders and end up with no tab clutter or bookmark hoarding.

    • ouch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Folders as a to do mechanism sounds interesting.

      I’m wondering if a date-based system could work.

  • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    This is super neat, but I swapped to Floorp awhile back because I like the workspaces feature.

    Super happy for folks who wanted this built-in tho.

    • univers3man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I really liked Floorp, but it kept breaking on work sites, so I had to switch back to FF. Super glad they are bringing this back.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        What, you don’t remember that part of the Bible?

        Mozilla 11:28 - “Come to me, all of you who have 87 tabs open, and I will give you grouping.”

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        It’s just an expression to express how great something is. It’s not an actual attempt to thank Jesus Christ for this.

        Don’t tell me you’re one of those people who makes a scene when someone says “god bless you” too

        • swab148@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          That’s why I always carry holy water in a spray bottle, I just spritz anyone who sneezes around me

          • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Many races believe that the creation of the Universe involved some sort of God, though the Jatravartid people of Viltvodle VI believe that the entire Universe was in fact sneezed out of the nose of a being known as the Great Green Arkleseizure. The Jatravartids live in perpetual fear of the time they call “the Coming of the Great White Handkerchief,” somewhat similar to the Apocalypse. However, the Great Green Arkleseizure theory is not widely accepted outside Viltvodle VI and so, the Universe being as wide and strange as it is, other explanations are constantly being sought by different races throughout the Galaxy.

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Can someone at least help me understand what tabs have that bookmarks don’t?

    If i have more then 4 tabs open i get anxious because i can’t intuitively remember what each does. I have folders for categories of bookmarks.

    • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s a combination of things… I’m a software developer, so I’ll often end up with 20+ tabs open while resolving a problem.

      • I don’t want to bookmark them because I don’t need them when I finish the task.
      • I can’t close the tabs until I’m sure everything’s working because Google sucks these days and who knows how hard it’ll be to find the source again.
      • Relying on browser history is like finding a needle in a haystack. Tasks can take multiple days and 100 different entries in history.
      • I might have “finished” a task that still needs tested and I know it’s a bit shaky; I’ll want to move onto a new task but keep the most useful references until I no longer need them.
      • I only bookmark pages that I’ll need long-term or multiple times. It’s already hard enough to keep those organized…

      My tab hoarding has only gotten this bad because search engines are terrible now and the amount of AI garbage to sort through makes finding anything useful a pain in the ass the first time; let alone trying to find it a second time.

        • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I have, mostly. The search engine wasn’t the point; they’re all pretty terrible these days with the absurd AI spam everywhere.

      • gaja@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I can’t stay productive with 20 tabs or applications open. I waste time searching. I feel drained if I’m working on a tough job and need something that is hidden. Maybe it’s on another desktop. Maybe it’s open in another instance. Maybe it’s not even open. Not for me.

        • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I feel you, and agree with most of it… buuutttt I think it’s even more frustrating to know you had a good reference that was closed and then spent a stupid amount of time to find again.

          Everyone has their own workflow, whatever works.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Relying on browser history is like finding a needle in a haystack.

        Oh sweet Satan, yes. I wish somebody could explain to me why browser history is so awful.

      • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I have the same workflow. Usually, I never have more than maybe three tabs open, but when I’m debugging something… oh god. Easily 15 or 20.

        I also bookmark extensively, and actually have my address bar set up to only give me suggestions from my bookmarks. Additionally, I use a tiling window manager, which makes managing windows and tabs very easy. I really don’t have a use for tab groups, but, who knows, maybe I’ll learn to use them someday.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I also bookmark extensively, and actually have my address bar set up to only give me suggestions from my bookmarks.

          This is what people don’t seem to realize they can do… You can literally create a bookmarks folder that you never look at again, only search through using your address bar.

          You can use a tab stash extension to turn all of your open tabs into bookmarks if you want to preserve what you had open that session. Then you can search through those bookmarks in your address bar.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’m the same way, I think it’s just a younger generation thing where they never close tabs and can have 100+ open at once

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      You’re on of us then!

      I, and many others, start closing stuff when there’s more than a handful.

      Others, like many, just run then forever and ever. A sea of icons, tiny and compressed. Worrying they’ll lose that tab they really like in amongst the clutter. Unaware of the history feature.

      • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I’m aware of the history feature. It doesn’t do what you seem to think it does (keep a tab in suspension in an easily accessible location over multiple hours or days of browsing).

        Now, the OneTab extension? That’s actually for for this purpose. History doesn’t do what it does.

      • unmagical@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago
        • History shows everything I’ve ever been to including the “nope that top result in my search engine actually didn’t contain the search string anywhere in its contents and is thus useless to me.” pages
        • Bookmarks are for things I routinely go to for years
        • Tabs are useful results for the projects I’m working on now.
        • Pinned tabs are the pages I visit multiple times a day.

        None of those is a substitute for any other.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Exactly, and if its important you just bookmark it.

        I tend to shorten my bookmarks to just a space so in practice they are just a row of tiny icons anyway. They are always at the same spot and only take resources when needed.

        I would love a vertical bookmark sidebar but for some reason we have to reinvent the wheel with tabs.

    • Sheridan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I keep tabs open for active projects. Once the project is over, I bookmark them for future reference.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Isn’t that the best way, though? I’m searching for something, but now I don’t need to do a web search because I’ve saved the link to it already. And I didn’t have to dig through a long list to find it.

          • RedSnt 👓♂️🖥️@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Oh yeah, when it comes to bookmarks I gave up trying to organize them into folders a long time ago, and I now try to add a few keywords/tags to the description to hopefully get the bookmark when I type in the address bar now.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            if only there was a fuzzy content search included. usually i don’t remember the page, or the topic, but just like… a quote.

            that’s actually a good use for this local ai stuff, take the contents of pages i bookmark and auto-tag it based on that. for that matter, archive the contents as well.

            • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              nb will do that for you whenever you create a bookmark with it.

              nb embeds the page content in the bookmark, making it available for full text search with nb search and locally-served, distraction-free reading and browsing with nb browse. When Pandoc is installed, the HTML page content is converted to Markdown. When readability-cli is installed, markup is cleaned up to focus on content. When Chromium or Chrome is installed, JavaScript-dependent pages are rendered and the resulting markup is saved.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 days ago

                that is… pretty neat. is there some way to get it to interop with a browser’s bookmarks?

                • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  You mean like syncing the two? Not that I know of. The most you can do is open nb bookmarks in the browser. If you know how to do any shell scripting, there’s probably a way to export your browser bookmarks and then import them into nb. I’ll have to research this.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        You are entitled to this but I don’t understand why it makes a difference if the icon is above or below the url here.

        If you have bookmarks hidden, thats an argument for a pretty bookmark manager.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          i use bookmarks for sites i access frequently, like a speed dial thing. i’ve set up my bookmarks toolbar to be in-line with the address bar and icon-only, so that it blends in with the rest of the interface. if i’m just going to go back to something one time i leave a tab open until i get time.

  • The lack of groups was the deal breaker for me, so after it rolled out to beta, I finally switched back to Firefox as my primary browser.

    Last I tried, I don’t think you could reorder or drag/drop groups and selecting multiple tabs doesn’t result in “group tabs” in the context menu, but it is still decent enough.

  • gencha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Go fuck yourself

    “Lastly, curious power users can flip the browser.tabs.smartGroups preference in Nightly to preview on-device AI grouping—just remember the prototype tag means rough edges are part of the deal.”

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      The prototype scans open tabs locally, suggests topical names, and auto-bundles related pages. Because all processing happens on the user’s computer, the company says, neither raw content nor behavioral signals are uploaded to the cloud.

      “AI” is just a buzzword, this isn’t chatbot nonsense as far as I can tell.

  • raptir@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’m glad they’ve added it to desktop, but based on my usage it’s more important for me on mobile. Hopefully they bring it to Android soon.

    • JayGray91@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Agreed. But I’m glad it’s native to desktop Firefox now. Grouping tabs in desktop works for me to hide the hundreds of tabs I keep to tens of groups 🤪

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      As someone who is disgusted by people’s browser tab hygiene on desktop, I will say that I do have this issue on mobile. But it’s really more about how the browser is set up (on Android at least). Every single link I click opens a new tab, and I almost never scroll through existing tabs because, out of sight out of mind.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      By now you would’ve expected someone to have pointed out what code is actually collecting that data that’s supposedly sold.

      • IncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Yeah, it still seems like an overreaction to a poorly communicated change, which, yes, might mean they’ll do it in the future. But for now, they have the benefit of the doubt from me, and once it starts happening, I’ll move to a fork.
        That being said, I don’t know anything about the code, so I have to count on the community to make it known that it’s actually been implemented.
        For now, as far as I understand, the only indication that they’re even considering it, is that change in the ToS or whatever. Nothing else to suggest it’s happening.

        • ashughes@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’d agree that it’s overblown and I suspect this reaction comes from users not understanding the complex legal framework Mozilla operates in globally and regionally, and Mozilla doing what it does best, miscommunication.

          IANAL but my interpretation of the situation is that in certain jurisdictions, California for example (where Mozilla is headquartered and where they have a legally binding contract in place with Google), they are and always have been “selling” your data from a LEGAL standpoint. It is a difference between how we users define selling (a literal exchange of data for money) versus how the law defines selling which can be much more broad and include things we wouldn’t define as selling.

          As far as the law is concerned, again, in some but not all jurisdictions, a) all data has monetary value to tech companies, and b) with Mozilla & Google in particular there is a monetary exchange (ie. a contract worth millions of dollars) for Google Search being integrated into Firefox as the default.

          Therefore, as far as the law is concerned, when you type into the Awesomebar or search box in Firefox, Firefox sends (sells) the data you entered (your data) to Google (because of course it does, that’s how the internet works) and this is a “sale of your data” under the legal definition. This is just one example from one jurisdiction Mozilla operates within, albeit a majorly influential and litigious jurisdiction.

          My understanding is they had to make that their terms of use because if they didn’t they’d be liable to get sued into oblivion in jurisdictions where using a web browser to browse the internet constituted a legal sale.

          Does this open the door to abuse and the literal sale of our data in the future, absolutely. But it’s on us to trust but verify, and do what we, the community, do best and hold Mozilla to account when they inevitably screw up.

          Anyway, this was a much longer comment than I intended to write, but that’s my take as a someone who has not just used Mozilla products for decades but also contributed labour as well.

  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Amg I couldn’t figure out how to collapse. I’m so happy rn. I’ve been containerising everything. It’s so soothing.