• radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    He has been making this kind of promise since the early 2000s, but never follows through. Just the goal post keeps moving to the right.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Supposedly he’s already given away half, why is it unthinkable that he’s planning to give away the other half?

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because good people don’t hoard wealth to begin with.

        He does this so people don’t hate him for helping to destabilize the global economy.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think only allowing bad people to hoard wealth would be a moral failure if a good person had the opportunity to choose.

    • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      While the goal post keeps moving, it’s the opposite of your statement. As explained in the article:

      That target would represent a doubling in spending for the nonprofit, which has disbursed more than $US100 billion since it was co-founded by Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates in 2000. Originally, the foundation was set to close 20 years after the Microsoft co-founder’s death.

      “I have decided to give my money back to society much faster than I had originally planned,” Gates, 69, wrote in a statement. “I will give away virtually all my wealth through the Gates Foundation over the next 20 years to the cause of saving and improving lives around the world.”

  • crank0271@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been sending his chain emails along since the 90s so he owes me some serious interest.

  • boydster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t that leave him still with something like $2 billion? I’m not knocking the philanthropy, but also, his safety net is going to remain about $2 billion dollars larger than mine most every other human being on this entire planet. And it will continue to accrue value at a higher rate than inflation as long as the good ol’ American engine keeps on chugging along as normal.

    From his vantage point, this sacrifice will likely impact neither his daily lifestyle nor his long-term comfort one iota.

    It’s a great thing he’s doing, and I want to be clear about that. He’s giving a boatload of money to charity. And I also don’t know what else he might be doing with the remainder. I might be being an asshole. I haven’t even read the article. I just saw that fuckin guy and the shining headline and had a strong reaction.

    (Edited)

    • rouxdoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t for a second think or hope that he endures the distress of poverty or feeling needy given where he started - he has tried to do good with his fortune and that is good enough for me…he is doing what he can for the world around him and should be comfortable as he does so. I hope to find my own (much less extravagant) comfort some day.

    • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      and thats the thing there are some who could realistically give away 99% of thier wealth and still individually be rich beyond belief. I hope it spawns some Rockefeller thing where the rich realize they can eat thier cake and have it to, they can be unbelievably rich and donate unbelievable ammounts of wealth, leaving a huge, arguably postive mark on history.

  • ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good guy bill, saw him also giving shit to Musk as well recently

    Bill Gates accused Elon Musk of killing poor children as he announced Thursday that he would donate his remaining fortune to his charity

    What a turn around from the 90’s

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t give it away.

    If you really want to help people, buy media, buy politicans and get REAL change that will actually last.

    You giving money to random charities does fuck all, except give you tax breaks.

    We need change in the political system so that we don’t need fucking charities for basic needs.

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Give it away now instead you piece of shit. If he actually gave a shit he would have donated it all to charities already. It’s just a billionaire farse, fuck him and the rest of em.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      He is. He is already giving it all away. He’s been doing it for 25 years and he will continue to do it for the next 20 years.

      You have to understand that his value grows over time and selling his stocks en masse would decrease their market value. He’s been maximizing the amount of good done very effectively.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        His value grows from exploiting even more people.

        You keep repeating the claim that selling his stocks rapidly would tank their sale value. Let’s see your math.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          OH NO! OH GOD NO! The US Tech Workers! They’re being forced to use, oh god no, forced to use Visual Studio Code *vomits

          Oh the exploitation!

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Stocks are an unpredictable mess of human behavior; you can’t put anything in a calculator to see what they will be tomorrow. It is based on market confidence.

          90% of investors won’t buy claims of “It’s just for charity” and will only see a massive sell off of MSFT, and drain the rest in turn through panic sales. It’s how every stock exchange crash has happened (though it can happen to just one or a few companies)

          The basic lesson for finance as in all things is whatever you want to do, it’s better to do it slowly over time. Even charities work better if they have funding over a long period to hire staff and plan events, rather than a sudden billion all at once for a room of 8 volunteers to figure out.

      • ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.comdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s been doing it for 25 years and STILL managed to reach 133 billion? No, I call bullshit. You don’t just accidentally end up with that kind of money while “giving it all away”, get real.

    • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      he actually gave a shit he would have donated it all to charities already. It’s just a billionaire farse,

      Just not his own goddamned tax avoidance scheme charity

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Great tax avoidance. Pay 100% of that money to some charity to avoid paying 20% to government

          • PunnyName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Careful now. Don’t go painting all charities as a form of tax avoidance just because a lot are used for that.

            There are many great charities for many great causes out there.

  • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t advertise scum. This guys is trying to literally spend 99% of his fortune to wipe off all the shit he has done.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Such heinous crimes such as:

      Saving hundreds of millions of people from Malaria…

      • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Read what other have said in the thread, the guy corrupts everything he touches. Vaccines are a big business and the guy is all about making money.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I mean, a quick Google search shows his net worth at 133b. 113b x 0.01 = 1.13 billion dollars.

      For context, bill is 69 yo, and the average US male lives to about 76 yo. That’s a difference of six years, or 2190 days. That means that Bill would have to scrape by on just $519,000/day.

  • Ecco the dolphin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bank Robber vows to give away his stolen funds by 20 years from now to charities of his choosing. He’s one of the good ones! So uplifting!

      • Ecco the dolphin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess I will over-explain my snarky comment.

        I’m making an analogy with robbing a bank, something that everyone would agree is a criminal activity because:

        1. Bill Gates is a billionaire. Billionaires hoard wealth that they cannot possibly spend in their lifetimes and use that excess wealth to influence our political processes to get what they want. The existence of billionaires is violence, just not the sort of direct violence we all recognize.

        If you don’t find that point convincing:

        1. The only reason Bill Gates is as wealthy as he is is due to Microsoft being so profitable. I think it’s funny how quickly everyone has forgotten how anti-competitive and scummy Microsoft was during the 1990-2010s (and even today), and they definitely wouldn’t be where they are today without those practices. If you believe in free markets, this should make you angry, because competition is good for the consumer. Anti-competitive practices could be seen as a type of theft here.

        A great deal of his wealth is unearned and comes at a cost to society in the form of an unfair technology market. He is the benefactor of a system who rewards those who have the most already, a system that allows your neighbors be homeless, sick and/or without basic necessities.

        Kind of like a bank robber has unearned wealth. A bank robber (who got away with it!) giving away their unearned wealth to their favored charities doesn’t really belong in Uplifting News.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh those poor US tech workers, living in ghettos, forced to rely on Windows XP and Microsoft Azure in order to survive. Woe is they. How could Bill have done this to them? /s

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol. As one of those tech workers I’ll never forgive Bill for making slashes the wrong way in DOS.

        But also, his foundation does good work and I support it. The amount of hate he’s getting in this thread just builds up the amount of eye roll I have for anyone who describes themselves as a “leftist”

  • TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still leaves him with just over $1 billion, enough for his great great grandchildren to live comfortably forever. Don’t be fooled, this is about tax breaks, not charity. Once you have over a billion in wealth, you’ve won the game of life. There’s nothing you can’t buy, there’s nothing you can do.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t be fooled, this is about tax breaks, not charity.

      And don’t forget, this is about laundering reputation. Hence the whole “in 20 years” crap.

    • lemonaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Once you have over a billion in wealth, you’ve won the game of life.

      More like the game of 100 lives. I’m using $10m as a gross estimation for what a person living comfortably needs to spend throughout their whole life. Sure it varies by country and other factors, but this amount should more than cover a lifestyle in which you literally don’t need to worry about a thing. No need for sketchy investments either: just stuff it in a deposit and you could live off the interest alone, but that’s assuming you have all the money at once.

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Truly a financial genius to give up 99% of his wealth for tax breaks…

      I figure he donates to his own charity and still has a lot of control over the money either way.

      I wonder what thatd look like on his taxes.

  • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Get fucked with a rusty rake bill, you helped stop the COVID vaccines from being patent exempt, among plenty of other awful shit, all for more money.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The vaccines were patent exempt, WTO adopted it officially in 2022, which the Gates Foundation endorsed shortly after Bill’s initial objection.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The first US full non-emergency-use approved vaccine was Pfizer-BioNTech in August 2021.

          Patent laws aren’t something they implemented to stop the vaccines, its the default stance which they, including the Gates Foundation, pushed to change for the greater good.

          • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You didn’t need to explain that patent laws existed before 2020.

            In May 2020, WHO, the Government of Costa Rica and other partners launched the COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP) to facilitate faster equitable and affordable access to COVID-19 health products for people in all countries. C-TAP, which is currently endorsed by 45 WHO Member States, was a response to the global Solidarity Call to Action. Its implementing partners include UNDP, the Medicines Patent Pool, the UN Technology Bank and Unitaid.

            https://www.who.int/initiatives/covid-19-technology-access-pool

            Medical patents do always cause death, of course. Artificial scarcity protects profits at the cost of lives. Bill Gates, and the Gates Foundation at first, opposed programs to allow poor countries to produce the vaccine themselves.