weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoBig naturals is way easier to pronouncesub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageBig naturals is way easier to pronouncesub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square65linkfedilink
minus-squareSchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoyou answered your own question
minus-squareewenak@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoWell what I learned in school was that zero was both positive and negative. I knew some people consider the natural numbers don’t include zero, but I didn’t know for some zero isn’t even positive.
minus-squareSchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoit is neither positive nor negative
minus-squareMBM@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoSome places (like France) talk about positive and strictly positive, others (like England) about non-negative and positive
minus-squaredeltapi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoI knew a physicist who considered 0 negative if she arrived at 0 coming from negative source numbers and positive if coming from positive sources. Something something sampling rate
you answered your own question
Well what I learned in school was that zero was both positive and negative. I knew some people consider the natural numbers don’t include zero, but I didn’t know for some zero isn’t even positive.
it is neither positive nor negative
Some places (like France) talk about positive and strictly positive, others (like England) about non-negative and positive
I knew a physicist who considered 0 negative if she arrived at 0 coming from negative source numbers and positive if coming from positive sources.
Something something sampling rate