• Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      While it helps the ritual it isn’t strictly required, so it can be easier for an apprentice to achieve.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    For me, the weirdest thing is that when a charged particle moves through a magnetic field, it experiences a force perpendicular to the direction of motion; this results in the particle tracing out a curved path through the field. Like … what the actual fuck? Why in hell would the universe be this way?

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why in hell would the universe be this way?

      Bcz it’s a simulation, or god is fucking with us. Who knows which one it is 🤷‍♀️

    • TheBeege@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s… huh…

      Hey!!! Physicists!!! Can we get your input???

      (Unless you’re a physicist, in which case… fuck)

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, imagine if friction worked like this. You’d push a heavy object … and it would move to the left (or maybe the right?) like it was on ice.

        FWIW I do have a Physics undergraduate degree. It doesn’t help in this case.

      • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yea I only have a bachelor’s in physics, can’t explain the black magic fuckery that is electromagnetism. Go find someone with a PhD, I bailed to be an engineer

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I fully agree, I thought the distinction was unbreakable rules.

    The laws of physics can’t be broken, even, under any circumstances, everywhere, at any time.

    Whereas magic is more like there is an exception to every rule kind of deal. It’s far more like software, as in it’s mostly fully logically consistent except for random spots where devs took some shortcuts to make life easier.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the “exception to every rule” part is really dependent on which type of magic the writer is using. Many writers do establish hard rules for their magic. In those cases, it’s less “magic is the exception” and more “magic is engrained into the laws of physics.”

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think magic is objective; I think it is in the eye of the beholder.

      If the audience don’t understand it, or can be distracted from seeing the truth of it, it’s magic or a miracle or whatever to them. And the magician - if they know what they’re doing - can wield power over the rubes.

      So before you understand - say, magnetism - better, lodestones can be seen as magical or heaven-sent.

      There’ll be physical phenomena today like ‘spooky action at a distance’ or something where even quite learned observers might not 100% know the laws of physics. Some exploit of that can appear as magical until the laws are figured out and well communicated.

      If it turns out that the underlying laws are stochastic rather than deterministic, then there’s always going to be some grey areas i think.

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    When we figure out how to manipulate elctro-weak at scale, it will be magic.

    Electro-mag is pretty crazy already, I agree. The ICP can’t even figure out how they work.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        When the environment is energetic enough, the electromagnetic force and the weak force unify into the electroweak force. The weak interaction controls radioactive decay.

        We can control electromagnetic force “at scale”, IMO. It’s not freely, but we have networks of electromagnetic systems that span continents.

        If we could control the weak force at the same scale… I’m not sure what wonders we might unlock. At the very least, I imagine we could “clean” instead of just “contain” radioactive waste, at least low-level stuff.

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If we had control over the weak force:

          • We can likely turn elements into other elements at will
          • We can manufacture safe decay sources for a new class of nuclear energy
          • We can probably create safe “decay batteries” tuned to their specific use cases. Batteries that last for tens of thousands the lifespan of current chemical ones.
          • Potentially engineer with neutrinos. Imagine communication via neutrinos, you could transmit straight through the earth.

          I mean, with control over matter like that, at the scale of electricity, Star Trek matter replicators would be a thing.

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a basic AC rectifier, the resistor represents an arbitrary DC load. You use similar circuits all the time, though generally with additional failsafes and some mechanism of smoothing out the rectified current.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not a resistor it’s actually a BIG LOAD. The diagram would better show it as a reactive load (usually just a rectangle) since most real loads are reactive. Get it?

    • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, yea. The people designing the AC to DC power supplies often don’t care what you use them for, why would they bother putting schematics for a real load on their diagram?