• JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I learned a long time ago that for me, social media is an output. I drop it and leave it. I don’t fucking care who reads it, or if they liked it.

      I was going to delete this, but I guessi already typed it

    • MakingWork@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah! I like my fake validation and fake likes from anonymous friends over here on lemmy. Fake friends are overrated.

      • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        the secret is i don’t think anyone on lemmy is my friend. i find everyone here frustrating and annoying! the system works!

          • Zement@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Damn,… Ruffalo looks young in this picture… then I realize, he was and we all got fucking old. This was 13 years ago!!!

            • Universal Monk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yep! Wait until you have kids that are older than your co-workers.

              Source: My kids are older than many of my co-workers. It sucks.

              The only way to fight it is to stay fit as fuck. Oh and retire early like I did. Takes some of the pain out of getting older!

              • Zement@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Exactly my plan my friend! Why bother grinding if you can’t afford anything? Better grind less and live more.

                • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I did that and “retired” to a ski resort in my mid 20s and pursued snowboarding instead. I’ve worked a variety of odd jobs to feed the habit and I’m lucky to be talented enough to be flowed gear.

                  If working a corporate 40 hr a week job that requires a degree doesn’t pay enough for me to move out of my moms house in NY and get an apt of my own somewhere nearby then fuck it, I’ll take some nonsense jobs and move to where I want and leave the grind entirely. My life is their $20k vacation. I’ve had more powder days than those rats in the race.

                • Universal Monk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Agreed. I basically took early retirement–I’m 55.

                  My pension is small since I bailed early, but I have zero debt, and very few bills, so I get by just fine. My kids are grown. My house and cars are paid off. Property taxes here are very low.

                  Sure, I won’t be traveling the world, but the park next to my house is beautiful, and I can see the mountains from my front porch. All is good.

                  Good luck to ya, mate!

                • Universal Monk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Not really. I mean I volunteer at the school where I worked, so I still count them as my coworkers… But since I don’t get paid, I guess technically they aren’t. But what would you call them?

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        There’s a pretty big difference between drinking mild poisons at a Nazi bar and a local bar. Zoomed out, sure, drinking alcohol at all can be considered pretty dubious, but the difference between the two scenarios remains.

        edit: replace what autocorrect put as “consistent” to “considered”

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The dumbass kid at work “I just use it for the art profiles I follow.” Not worth it kid, not worth it at all.

    • Spezi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think its hidden with a message that it contains something sensitive and you actively have to click on show to show it. Not sure though as I’m not on Xitter anymore.

    • hexabs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s a bit pedantic. App is used interchangeably to represent the whole platform.

      I work as a SWE in a team with 15 year veterans at an App company that is a top 10 most downloaded on Android/iOS. We still use the word app this way in tech meetings.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Meta is even worse.

      Even people who were/are on the right are noticing it.

      Tom Segura isn’t a great guy, but I saw a clip of one of his podcasts where they were talking about Instagram. Any post anyway related to a Black person is just gonna be filled with comments saying the n word.

      As fucked up as it is, TikTok appears to be the only big one that’s removed hate speech for a while now. It’s just become incredibly normalized which is why the wealthy keep gobbling up social media.

      They want a race war, a culture war, anything to stop 99% of the population from figuring out the 1% have been fighting a class war for decades.

      It’s all a distraction to stop people from talking about why billionaires are fucking over everyone else and we’re not stopping it.

      • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Can you elaborate on ‘Tom Segura isn’t a great guy’? I think he’s funny and I’m wondering if there’s something I’m missing.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s not like he’s a giant asshole himself…

          But he’s friends with Joe Rogan and agrees with him on a lot of stuff. And has said he enjoys “trolling” even about racial issues.

          So he’s at best just tolerable of assholes with extremist views, which is why it was notable even he has pointed out how bad social media is getting.

        • spireghost@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Tom Segura

          Went on a tirade talking about “the poors” after he got told to check in his carry-on on a flight

  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    IDK How to tell you this, but fascist racists own everything and are planning to kill a whole bunch of people soon. I really think people are under estimating the severity of the vision these people have for the world.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      kill a whole bunch of people soon

      If you don’t couch this a whole lot, it undermines the seriousness of what is actually about to happen.

      Anything less than tens of millions dead falls short of your comment. And that’s likely not the reality.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Maybe I’m unusual here, but if I saw 200 corpses in a big pile, I would think that someone killed a whole bunch of people.

        • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          To your point, it’s funny how we frame things depending on the circumstances.

          Growing up I always thought the Saint Valentine’s Day Massacre was some huge slaughter where hundreds of people died. Turns out it was seven people. Mobsters, actually, so it could be argued it was “gang violence”, but still. Seven people executed by a rival gang, and it’s a massacre.

          At least 37 die, over 800 injured, and over 10000 were left homeless, but Tulsa ignored it for decades, then called it a,“race riot”.

          Twenty children and six adults are murdered by a nutter and it’s still not a massacre, but at least it’s “tragic”, which is a step up from the average school shooting, which is normally called “Tuesday”.

          Over 45,000 Afghan civilians died from 2001-2021, but that’s not a massacre, just collateral damage.

          But that’s over twenty years, of course that’s not a massacre, plus they’re, you know, foreign. Now if 45,000 Americans died in one year, well, that would be different. Except they do, but because they lack insurance coverage. So, you know, that’s their fault for dying of preventable illnesses on account of being poor. That’s not a massacre, just good business.

          But one CEO is murdered and it’s a tragedy again

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Over 45,000 Afghan civilians died from 2001-2021, but that’s not a massacre, just collateral damage.

            But that’s over twenty years, of course that’s not a massacre, plus they’re, you know, foreign. Now if 45,000 Americans died in one year, well, that would be different. Except they do, but because they lack insurance coverage. So, you know, that’s their fault for dying of preventable illnesses on account of being poor. That’s not a massacre, just good business.

            And when Israel kills that many Palestinians in one year, college kids get arrested for protesting it while Congress jacks off while rubberstamping another $10 billion of arms sales to Bibi.

      • Rooskie91@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Is the holocaust really your measurement for the meaning of “killing a bunch of people?” I don’t think things have to get all that bad to be justified in saying “a bunch of people died.”

        When you look into where contemporary right wing ideologies comes from, and what journalists are reporting on in online right wing spaces, a holocaust doesn’t seem out of the question. The Turner Diaries is worth looking into. Robert Evans is also a pretty informed journalist on the matter.

      • sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        What are you guys talking about?

        Stop downvoting and tel what they are talking about lol

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Anything less than tens of millions dead falls short of your comment. And that’s likely not the reality.

        Trans people, the group currently most targeted for elimination by the right, represent about 1% of the US population. Jewish people in pre-Nazi Germany also represented about 1% of the population.

        When Republicans past eliminationist laws meant to persecute trans people, deny them from public life, and kill them by taking away their healthcare, they are committing crimes of the same order as what Germany did in the 1930s.

        That is simple historical by-the-numbers truth.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          1% is 3.8 million people. They’ll likely be ostracized, forced into hiding, and we all know the effects of that.

          We’re both describing terrible things, terrible things that are short of hunting people down and loading them into trains.

          Your comparison does a disservice to everyone. Setting the bar at the damn holocaust gives our opponents an easy out. “They act like we’re”, “we’re just”, are the natural, easy responses.

          Don’t give them easy outs. Things can be less terrible than the actual Holocaust and still be terrible.

          • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            They’re talking about rounding up 20 million people and deporting them. Do you really think you can do that without setting up massive camps that match or exceed the scale of anything the Nazis set up? And if you really want to move that many people around, you may end up having to use trains.

            Oh, and worse, they have no plan on how to actually deport that many people. The Nazis originally planned to deport all the Jews as well. Yet they quickly found that there simply weren’t enough nations willing to accept all these deportees. Other countries aren’t obligated to accept your deportees.

            So you now have millions of people in camps, costing a fortune to maintain, and no where to send these people. That always ends in slavery, death, or death by slavery. Whenever your plan starts with “round up tens of millions of people and put them in camps,” you can guarantee that a massive death toll is going to follow.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              And I think your comment here is a hell of a lot more valuable than starting out with “IDK How to tell you this, but fascist racists own everything and are planning to kill a whole bunch of people soon.”

              You can’t just skip to the end of the worst case scenario without people blowing you off. I mostly agree with you; I just think that particular messaging is damaging.

              • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                I think starting off so dismissive until later in the thread makes it seem very much like you don’t mostly agree and is more damaging to the idea

        • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          The chilling thing for me is that Nazi Germany was able to accomplish this without the technology and mass surveillance we have today.

          It will be a slow boil and they’ll arrest people one at a time for “terrorism” and such. I won’t be surprised to see extremist militias going after people as well.

          • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            They won’t even need to use terrorism. Right in Project 2025 is a plan to slowly classify any public existence or acknowledgement of LGBT identities as “pornographic.” And in turn classify showing “pornography” to children is pedophilia and worthy of being put on the sex offender registry. They want to make it so if say, a trans woman, goes out in public and a child sees her, then that is the equivalent of grooming an 8 year old child by showing them pornographic videos. Oh, and they also want to attach the death penalty to crimes of pedophilia.

    • figaro@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Can you quantify soon here? I agree with you that they don’t have good intentions, but I think that framing it as like, a planned genocide is not accurate. More realistically what can happen is more systemic injustices and consolidations of power to prevent anyone from resisting.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        To start with, their plan for mass deportation probably already counts as a displacement genocide. There will be thousands of deaths from it leaving aside everything else wrong with it.

        There are also approximately 3 million trans people in the US. Every single one of them is in danger as the fascists’ chosen scapegoat.

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I have used it sarcastically on news@world and got it mod deleted.

      I guess it’s white fragility masked as fairness/equity.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Being able to disregard being called “cracker” is itself a form of white privilege. As a white guy, I don’t have to care if some black person expresses hatred against me because I have power that they do not (e.g. they’re not likely to act on their hatred because if the police are called they’re likely to take my side, etc.). The implied threat is not credible.

      In contrast, black people do not have the freedom to ignore white people calling them the n-word, because historically that has been accompanied by a real risk of attack. The likelihood may have waned over the years, but that implied threat remains credible. (That goes double for the fact that, as casual/mainstream use of the word has fallen out of favor, those still willing to use it are all the more extreme/violent-tempered.)

      • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        As another lifelong beneficiary of white privilege, thank you for pointing this out. I never considered this perspective.

        • blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          THIS!!! THIS IS WHY YOU NEED EDUCATION AND SAFETY! PEOPLE WANT TO LEARN AND DO BETTER!

          Let me add one. People that don’t look like us think before they speak in meetings. They are scrutinized constantly and often afraid. We can ask a colleague “hey not straight white guy, you’re interested or expert in XYZ, and haven’t shared your input, what do you think?”

          Making space can be that micro and so impactful.

      • Gift_of_Gab (they/them)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is exactly how systemic racism works. White people weren’t kept as slaves and called ‘cracker’ as a label. Black people were kept as slaves and called the N word as a label. The implication, via the word, is that they were less-than-human. We’re just about back to the time period where lawmakers openly use the N word again. I’m in Canada, yet even from here I can see it happening, and it’s terrifying for me, so I can’t imagine what it’s like for American people of colour, or women, or 2SLGBTQIA+, etc.

        If you are one of those people, whomever is reading this, just know you have allies.

      • Realitätsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Being able to disregard being called “cracker” is itself a form of white privilege

        No it means I’m not offended by every stupid shit some cringelord says online.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        And boomers and relatively old generations.

        I have older folks don’t really get what a website is, and family kids that don’t either.

        Theres a narrow demographic that (as a whole) experienced the “old” internet outside of siloes and apps.

  • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s actually got nothing to do with race, it’s because of a lack of proper capitalisation and punctuation… right? It surely isn’t racism?

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Exactly the opposite lesson to take. We need public social media, not corporate social media. We need rights and guarantees, not profit taking and psyops.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Because the government of the US is very well known for letting dissenting voices have a soap box…

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I like having a bunch of nonprofits because if one turns bad, I can switch. Your idea will work better if the state becomes controlled by the public.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          States are never controlled by the public, or the working class, to be more precise.

          States exists to protect the interest of oligarchs. Nothing more, nothing less.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think in 2025 the “rights and guarantees” you want aren’t going to be provided by state or corporate social. Defederated / self hosted is the way.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    People, please stop using twitter. Stop giving your attention and money to terrible people. Some people, like that white lady, are weak-minded and they will never learn.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I agree completely. Unfortunately, we live in a world where the racist rapist traitor felon just won the popular freaking vote in the country the site is based in.

        So even though I deleted my account a long time ago and so did half the people here, the idea of not using xitter because it’s run by a nazi hasn’t even entered into most people’s minds to be considered in the first place.

      • StopTouchingYourPhone@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        If your question wasn’t rhetorical, addiction is one reason I can think of. Folks are tied up in a certain kind of Feed depending on the places they go online, and twitter/facebook are aggressively designed to make you stay, right? It might be as emotionally daunting as a smoker knowing they should quit. idk - I was lucky to not invest any time with those platforms, but I have kicked one addiction and failed to quit others, so I have some sympathy if that’s what’s holding people back.

        Another reason is rubbernecking at the car crash. People are still on twitter because it’s where all the drama people/news are talking about IS.

        Other than that? Nazis are there to be accellerationists, and internet debate club folks are there to perform civilized discourse (“so someone reading in the future can see that the nazi was wrong”).

        If your question was rhetorical, my bad.

        • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          When I got banned from Instagram I went through actual withdrawal. I was very upset, I felt cut off from the world and digitally exiled. I still do. If I was desperate enough I could of made another account but after a decade+ with the same account - which got banned for standing up to Nazis and fascists - I gave up. Fuck Zuck. The same happened to me on Reddit too.

          The technofascists hate leftists, they shadow ban them, they block their accounts, they ban at the isp level. They are propagandizing millions of people into right wing bullshit and worse.

          I don’t have tik tok because I don’t trust China nor an algorithm as addictive as it but there’s a reason it’s being banned in the US: it doesn’t ban leftist content and in fact likely promotes it. Our oligarchs can’t allow that to happen. Class consciousness must be prevented at all costs or they lose their power.