• Phen@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Huh, this sort of issue is what made me leave KDE in the first place. Haven’t had such problems on gnome.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds like a skills issue/design decision. Like the devs could do otherwise, they just didn’t. There’s nothing in GTK preventing this from working properly.

        • edinbruh@feddit.itOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          2560x1080 which is 21:9 full hd. Most programs don’t really handle 21:9 displays, but many GTK apps are particularly bad at it

        • edinbruh@feddit.itOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          (after edit)

          I have no issue with the text size, I have an issue with enormous empty space around the text. It’s fine if it’s not perfect on a 21:9 display, but this wouldn’t look good even on a 16:9 display.

          I’m also fine with the text not taking up the entire width, I aggre that it’s less readable. But I think the window (not the text, the window) could utilise the width better.

          I say that the messages could be a little more spread out (i.e. my massages could be a little to the right while other’s a little to the left) and just like the left sidepanel appears and disappears when the window is too thin, more sidebars could appear to the right when the window is very wide.

          • _stranger_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            These are all design choices though, not technical limitations of the gdk. I’m no expert in it though. Is it possible it’s missing the tools that make building those other design features easy?

            • edinbruh@feddit.itOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              AFAIK one of these are technical limitations, it’s just design choices. But in my experience, the design choices made following the gnome design guidelines tend to make apps with tiny faces

      • bjorney@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That looks like it’s just wrapping a WebView, is it not?

        It looks like the CSS is just capping the container class width at 1440px, which has nothing to do with GTK

          • bjorney@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair - point still stands though - the application only has a single breakpoint defined at 600sp from a cursory glance, the lack of an ultra-wide specific layout is just because it hasn’t been implemented rather than a shortfall of GTK (though I’m not sure you would even want to make the message view wider, as it would impair readability)

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    the edits to charlie kirk’s face are so subtle these days, I can’t tell if this is the original or has been slightly modified.

    • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It had been so long since I’d seen his real face that I didn’t know how it actually looked like anymore. I saw a clip of him a few days ago and thought ‘oh, they aren’t changing it that much’

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        there was this real or fake quiz online that shows Kirk’s face and you try to tell whether it’s edited. it was really funny because it was actually hard to tell.

  • ter_maxima@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m having this problem on Android rn. Coming from iOS, the content density is just super low, and no amount of tweaking display/font size will fix it 🙁

    My screen is 50% padding now 🤷🏻‍♀️

  • lmuel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I enjoy using Gnome and don’t really encounter any issues in my day to day use

    (pls don’t kill me :))

    • wer2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t like Gnome, but I am glad it works for you. At the end of the day Gnome is better than Windows, Mac, and CDE.

    • voodooattack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used to be a GNOME fanatic a couple of years ago. I switched to KDE after I got tired of the perpetually broken state of extensions.

      I’m still thankful for all the effort and commitment the GNOME devs have invested over the years though! It’s an excellent desktop environment!

      • cole@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I went the opposite way. Wanted to like KDE, but found it too buggy and a bit inconsistent.

        On Gnome I use really minimal extensions and those get updated very quickly so it is no longer an issue for me. I also do Gnome Extension reviews so take from that what you will

        • voodooattack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think what drove me to that decision was the cpufreq extension. It kept breaking with every update. I usually shrugged it off but it really irked me every time.

          My last straw was when they changed the theming system to force the use of libadwaita and broke my customised theme and dark mode. I don’t do a lot of customisation in general but I have rigid preferences when it comes to how I want my system to look and behave. They broke it and that drove me to explore other solutions.

          I tested KDE Plasma for a couple days and I managed to replicate my setup in like 4 hours—most of which I spent exploring new things that would be impossible to do in GNOME without modifying its code base—and the end result was an improved setup which was less clunky since I didn’t have to use as many extensions as I did with GNOME to begin with. It was bliss for me.

          I ultimately decided to move on.

    • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t like using GNOME desktop or apps, but that’s not because its bad or less capable for my usage. I just don’t prefer their design philosophies. I’m grateful that it exists nonetheless. Linux desktop users are spoiled by how many great choices we have.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can somebody tell me how to change that in Mint Cinnamon? I really don’t like the padded bar at the top of every window.

  • Err(()).unwrap()@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    don’t you just fucking love  
     
     
                                                   paddings!  
     
     

    (apologies to everyone whose device can’t render HTML entities)

  • darksiderbun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay so I remember seeing this exact post yesterday. Not that this is stolen, like this exact post. I read some of the comments and chuckled because tiny face Charlie Kirk is funny. I saw a picture of him on a video this morning and never realized that HIS FACE IS ACTUALLY KINDA LIKE THAT WHY IS IT SO SMALL AND CENTERED.