Previously:

  • NotNotMike@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m torn - while I’m not a fan of the new look, I’m also viciously anti-lawn-grass so I can’t complain too much.

    • Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s SO plain looking, I’m surprised too! He usually goes for “tackiest possible approach” so this feels like an oversight, even though its objectively a better outcome.

  • kalpol@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of everything, this is low on the list of things to be annoyed about. While there were probably better ways, this is an area used for gatherings and DC being DC, it is pretty marshy and unusable as a lawn. There have been plans for a long time to do something like this.

    • Sertou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      More importantly, this will be easily undone later, unlike much of the other damage he has done or plans to do. Compared to those things, I can’t get too worked up over this.

    • TWeaK@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also the actual roses were in the bushes on the side.

      I’m pretty sure they did actually get rid of a lot of the flowers anyway and got rid of things they shouldn’t have, but the layout of it isn’t so drastically changed and the lawn can easily be replaced.

  • Kirp123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a good representation of this new regime. Tear down nature and replace it with a parking lot.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It also looks like something you’d find at a cheap, trashy resort where children poop in the pool.

      • Jack@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        A good representation of the old regimen, as unnatural as concrete, but at least trying to appear natural

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t require constant watering and fertilizer that leeches into ground water just so you can have perfectly green 2" tall grass fully exposed to the sun that doesn’t want to live there and call it “nature”.

          • Riskable@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you mow your lawn with an electric lawn mower that’s charged via solar panels, your lawn is a carbon sink (assuming you water it via some renewable means).

          • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re going to get nitpicky we could focus on how much heat the concrete retains vs plant life which can absorb and use the energy. All the people with concrete or rock yards around here are super hot, my dog and I have to run by in the summer. Paving vast surfaces is a poor alternative to landscaping. The soil underneath will dry and the animals, insects, microflora, etc will all be forced out and that part of the earth will just be dead.

            But really it just looks dumb and Jackie planted some of those trees.

        • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, for this space that is frequently used to host people or filled with chairs for a press conference, it is better and makes more sense.

          • sthetic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree. I hate Trump as much as anyone else, but if a President I liked did this, it wouldn’t be the end of the world.

            In principle, I don’t mind if a space mainly used for events, with chairs placed there often, should be hardscape. It’s not as if lawn can’t be put back there in the future. Lawn isn’t a heritage tree or rose shrub.

            To be fair though, the photo makes it look pretty huge as an expanse of paved area.

            • skisnow@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, it’s not that he did it per se, it’s the idea that he probably did it because he’s a classless fat troll.

              Same with some of his policies; grand scheme of things if they were presented by most other people I’d have little objection, but because they’re motivated by greed, hate or narcissism I don’t want to give the twat an inch.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The problem is, have you ever noticed how much hotter you are in a parking lot on a warm day than when you are in a park? Well, now those events are happening on a parking lot and not a park. Furniture can be designed to work on turf, or temporary fixtures could be put in place to mitigate the drawbacks of furniture on lawns, but the absorbed and reflected heat will be hard to get rid of. Hopefully this area is small enough to not have a big impact on the temperature there.

            I honestly don’t think it looks bad, but I suspect it’s more for Trump to put his stamp on it than anything else, and to erase the efforts of others before him. And I suspect it will be more uncomfortable than it was before.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it’s a garden?

      That being said pre Wilson, it actually had garden beds where the lawn was.

      Also ask yourself in the context of a garden, what is better vegetation than grass to walk on?

      • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        1. Ants can and do live in paved spaces. There is a layer of sand under the slabs that is easy for them to excavate tunnels from, with the entrance between two slabs.

        2. It’s the white house. It gets sprayed for insects anyway.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, I’m amazed he managed to restrain himself from making it mostly gold. Can’t imagine that this ballroom will have such restraint.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone should create a fuckgrass community so all the virtue signalling can be contained.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would have returned it to nature with native plants. Krasnov created a smaller Red Square and now he wants a fucking Ballroom for $200 million! WTF!

  • arin@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Truely mild compared to all the scientific executions that happened

  • Trapped In America@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s your problem. All that grass makes for a terrible child sacrifice during their pedo parties. The blood soaks right in and you never get a chance to collect it for the Sangria mix.