• blind3rdeye@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Company says that everyone should give them money and stop using competing products.

    Obvious thing to say in the land of self-interest.

    • ChetManly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nope… i don’t have cable or even great cell service and I live 45 minutes from a major city. Current ETA on fiber is mid 26.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        oh my god… I can’t believe I’m still getting surprised by how terrible things are in the US. it is the richest, poorest country.

        EDIT: holy shit i just saw a 2019 OECD report that says the us had less than 20% of its fixed internet users connected by fiber which is way below the average for the 37 countries studied in the report, which was 27%.

        funny thing is i remember reading about this very report in a news article, which was about how my country was way below the average; noting countries like japan, south korea and a bunch of european countries had above 50%. but i think the number for my country was something like 22%. we’re not even in the EU and we had higher coverage than the US? that’s crazy.

        • ChetManly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          America… where speech is money and regulatory capture is the norm. Also, fuck Elon for having the ONLY viable alternative for someone who works from home. I can’t wait for the day I can light that dish on fire.

    • Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I live in a backwater northern U.K. town. We have fibre. I’d have thought somewhere like USA was rolling it out to most places.

    • Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      HahahahahaHHAHAHAAHSHAHAHAHDHDGF Country wide fiber in the US?? Think of the local monopolies gouging hundreds of dollars out of you for what amounts to dial up compared to fibre! Do you expect them to upgrade their infrastructure when they can do nothing and continue to make money??

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hmmm ditch lightning fast and stable fiber for the mediocre speed and unstable micro satellite internet connection controlled by a petty asshole…

    What to do, what to do?

    • d00ery@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just think how much control he can have if he owns the medium which people access the internet.

      And he’d only do good things with that power /s

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, you don’t have to guess. He’s interfered in a war and turned a social network into his personal bullhorn.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It shouldn’t be all or nothing. It should be diversified.

    Yeah, there are rural locations where Starlink makes sense but also there are a lot of urban places that it would never work in.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That, and if they could pull heavy copper wiring to the furthest rural reaches of the country in the 1930s, they can pull fiber along side it today. The poles and right of way is already there. Satellite is a fine stop-gap while it gets done, but there’s no excuse for it to be the permanent solution.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Going from the most secure, hard wired formats to a con man’s satellites would be a fatal error. Any sort of military conflict and the network is all down, atleast broadband keeps secure networks intact.

    • gramie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just have a look at what’s going on in ukraine. Once they started using drones, the drone were attacked through their wireless connections. Now they trail fiber optic cables for control. What does that say about the relative reliability and security?

  • aliser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    do they know what competing is? fiber is much cheaper, stablier, offers less latency and more speed.

  • Vile_port_aloo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    SpaceX should deliver the service and access at the cost given and complete before the fiber team put a shovel in that ground.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    American taxpayers paid for both Starlink and Space X. Overpaid, actually, that’s why he’s the richest man in the world. None of his businesses are profitable, he just skims hundreds of billions off the enormous government grants he gets.

    Since we overpaid for that tech, we should just confiscate it from him. He can be thankful that he doesn’t go to prison for misappropriating government funds.

    He can keep Tesla. It’ll be bankrupt in 2 years anyway.

  • uhdeuidheuidhed@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember how Elon Musk conned Vegas out of millions with the hyperloop.

    Satellite internet is not the future; it’s cell internet.

      • uhdeuidheuidhed@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        We already have physical lines.

        Businesses and governments aren’t going to invest in digging and laying down more cables to give people in rural America access to fiber. They’re already reluctant to do it for major cities.

        • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fibre deployment is getting cheaper and easier. Both in terms of cost of materials and in the equipment and labour skills.

          It’s also much more secure from interference and disruption.

          For populated areas, there’s zero justification to rollout wireless over fibre lines. And most major cities already have fibre in most, or many, areas. And the thing with fibre is that the physical lines can be used to deploy faster speeds with upgraded endpoints.

          Tech bros would have you think physical connections aren’t a good choice anymore, because laying down fibre isn’t sexy enough for that VC money.

        • darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They actually have invested multiple times. Problem is the companies they give the money to just pocket it and don’t update their infrastructure. Give this money to the local community or coop owned fiber operators. Stop giving money to these huge corps that don’t need it and fund the small coop and community run fiber operators.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conned them and then Nashville, I think it is, is also paying him for it. True stupid, the US isn’t a country of learners, it seems.