Proposed legislation behind the impending US government shutdown contains provisions that would ban federal funding for transgender adults, as well as youngsters.

    • razzazzika@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m in one of those, fucked either way cases. If the government doesn’t shut down, I lose my healthcare, if it does shut down I potentially lose my job since I work for the government.

      • Sausager@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry you’re in that position. I can’t believe this is where were at. Who non millionaire could possibly be on the presidents side on this one?

      • Bosht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey! A fellow gov worker! So, how’s the last 6 months been stress shitting your guts out and expecting to be fired every day? Because I’m sure as fuck not having a good time and want off this god damned ride.

        • razzazzika@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The worst part is I’m fairly new, I accepted the job offer before the election and started it after the election. The hope day I accepted the job offer and the dread of starting first day was quite disparate.

        • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Funnily enough, I was a government worker shortly before Trump took over. The highlights included gaslighting me on my rights as a worker, telling me not to rock the boat, then shitcanning me when I filed grievances with my union. The very same union that refused to go to bat for me because “arbitrations are expensive”.

          Also having my eyes opened to the absolutely ludicrous waste generated by government operations. I saw brand new 24 inch computer monitors still sealed in the box thrown in the trash, but I was simply told “there is no government waste” when I asked what was going on. Seeing a forklift bought for a single job before being “scrapped” was also wild.

          Honestly, do yourself a big favor and look for a transfer to private sector. I’ve got a union that actually listens to me now and better benefits than a fed. Couldn’t be happier.

          • luciferofastora@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The very same union that refused to go to bat for me because “arbitrations are expensive”.

            What the fuck

            Sounds like government workers need a new union. Not that they’d ever get it, I assume, particularly if it poses a risk of actually being able to do something rather than just serving as a scapegoat to point at why unions are useless.

            • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not enough to catch your employer breaking the law. It’s not even enough to have a mile wide paper trail leading anyone with eyes to the evidence of your employer breaking the law. When your employer is the government, every single person involved is directly incentivised to protect the employer from any and all indication that they could have possibly done anything wrong, ever.

              This includes your union rep, who is still paid by the very same tax dollars you are paid with, though in a round about way.

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    All trans healthcare? Does that mean all transition-related care? Or all healthcare to trans people?

    My moneys on both

    • compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would bar federal funding from going to any hospital or medical facility that provides gender-affirming care, including HRT. Like a Hyde Amendment for trans healthcare. Basically, no medical facility that wants to take Medicaid or Medicare would be able to provide gender-affirming care. Oh, you’ve got an entire hospital? That’s nice, but you have a single endo who prescribes HRT, so no funding at all for you.

      • Sunflier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would bar federal funding from going to any hospital or medical facility that provides gender-affirming care

        Oh, so it would ban all healthcare as transcare. Got it.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    IDK how dumb this idea is, but what if Trump/Republicans that align with him are trying to cause a shutdown to take advantage of the chaos somehow and blame it on the Democrats, and part of the reason for sending the military to Portland/LA was to anger the Democrats enough to not fold?

    • croaker@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no 5D chess from this administration. They’ve proven themselves time and time again to be greedy and incompetent.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Put down the tack board and red thread. Not everything is part of a conspiracy. Not everything is connected. Not everything is a distraction from the Epstein files. Not everything is part of some grand plan. The fascists are perfectly capable of doing multiple awful things at once, each for their own independently awful reason.

      • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Threatening violence on your opponent’s territory right before you have to negotiate with them is stupid though unless you have a reason to want things to escalate

    • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a dumb idea, it’s almost certainly what’s occurring, with the caveat that I don’t think they actually want to shut the government down. Whenever you hear about an impending government shutdown, it is always a game of political chicken, trying to find out who will cave first, while simultaneously trying to preemptively sell the public that it’s the other party’s fault. Look at the messaging from the white House and congressional majority leadership. It’s all “oooh the Democrats aren’t willing to pass our super clean funding bill to keep the government open, they are unserious and willing to hold the American people hostage in order to continue mutilating babies”. Meanwhile, Democrats state (accurately) that Republicans need Democrat votes to pass anything, therefore it is incumbent upon them to negotiate in good faith.

      There’s nothing more antithetical to Trumpism than good faith negotiation and compromise, so he’s doing everything in his power to avoid that, lest it appear like he had to cave to Schumer, to include cancelling the meeting they had scheduled last week in favor of doing the meeting today, at the 11th hour, to further pressure the Dems into capitulating.

      Now, it’s important to note that, for all of the political brinkmanship on display, shutting down the government is, historically, far more damaging for the majority party than the minority, though the public tends to take a dim view of everyone involved in this sort of situation. Therefore, Dems have reason to stand fast and Republicans have an incentive to make concessions. This is in addition to the fact that Schumer got a lot of flak for instructing Dems to fund the government back in the spring, so he’s also likely motivated to feign some backbone in this particular tete a tete.

      I consider the occupation of certain cities to be mostly unrelated to the funding fight. In fact, it would have behooved Trump to not antagonize Dems leading up to this for the aforementioned reasons. With that being said, Trump doesn’t do things according to what makes political sense, and, to your point, I can see a scenario where Trump is the only person at the negotiation table today who is totally ambivalent about whether a deal is struck or not. A local (Republican) representative was quoted with a statement to the effect of, “I’m not sure if the Dems have considered the fact that the Presidency is granted additional powers in the event of a budget related shutdown, maybe they should think about that”.

      So, you’ve got Dems at the table who are motivated to follow through with a shutdown unless they get certain carve outs. You’ve got congressional Reps at the table who are aware that the American public has historically always blamed the party in power when a shutdown occurs, and are thus motivated to make concessions, but quietly. And then you’ve got Trump et al, who gain additional emergency powers in the event of a shutdown, further diminishing the legitimacy of the other branches of government and increasing the consolidation of power within the executive branch. However, if the government doesn’t shut down, Trump will likely spin this as yet another example of his brilliant negotiating ability (see also the Gaza peace plan released this week), even if there’s a snowballs chance in hell that any concession appears in further funding bills the next time this occurs.

      Idk if any of that holds any water in the face of evidence, but it’s compelling speculation.

  • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well I guess no more gender affirming surgeries for balding fat loser white guys also then.

    • okmko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just now?? His third term and beyond aren’t jokes. He never makes jokes that’s not a veiled threat. The dude has such little empathy at his age that he isn’t able to feign anything without revealing his real intentions.