Vim has long since won the war. I say that as an emacs user who is familiar with using vim because it’s installed by default on the vast majority of computers I interact with nowadays
My boy nano getting a drive by. He always there for me when I need to quickly edit a conf file
Delete
nanoalready.Let’s make
microthe standard!!make the standard
code-insidersbut in vim modeNah,
ededis, in fact, in the POSIX standard.https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/
Shell & Utilities -> Utilities -> ed
In fact, it looks like
exandsed, both child editors ofed, are baked into the standard. Nopico-family editors.
Nice, an analognowhere I missed!
Why should micro be the standard over nano?
Because
nanohas unacceptable key combos, and no support for mouse.microhas sensible key combos, good syntax highlighting and supports mouse perfectly fine.deleted by creator
European Commision’s laptops run on Windows 11 and then they need to pay for AWS to do any kind of meanigful work… And then some devs still pick Windows to run on AWS anyway!
just run a logon script to alias both vim and emacs and nano for all your users.
Freedom of religion is a fundamental human right. Evangelization should not be punished. I protest (:
I default to vim because I want an editor that just works and doesn’t need a lot of customization. I have nothing against emacs or nano.
Awesome. And now…
- Step 2: Tabs or spaces.
Vertical or horizontal tabs?
Slazer here opening a new front in the tabs v space war
New?
a tab is four spaces… press tab all you want…
More: Tabs or buffers.
to summarize the conclusions thus far, as is my secretary duty
amendments to the protocol of this EU directive are as follows in the first line of
stallingsamendments:TECO is to be legacy alternative to EMACS and all personell are to be provided paid leave for educational purposes.
ED is to be legacy alternative to VIM and all personell are to be provided paid leave for educational purposes.
up for further discussion: are ideologically united editors such as VILE (VI Like Emacs) middleground or offensive to both parties? is it right of marginalized editors to invoke a non-mono
polyculture clause: “will SAM or VIS be up for consideration?” asks [name redacted under GDPR]How is do they count Neovim?
Also, Emacs absolutely can emulate vim, making it unnecessaryNo mention of ms edit? I feel this won’t last.
I use helix, BTW. It’s like vim (but backwards) and it’s written in rust.
main selling point being that it’s purple
It’s like neovim if you had amnesia and forgot all the time spent installing plugins and getting your configs just right.
Time to burn Europe. This injustice will not stand.
Defaulting to nano without explicit user consent will be considered a class c user experience violation
One step forward, two steps back. I always hate how politicians can be so accommodating of the popular minority while still being so discriminatory against the less popular ones.
All offices within the EU administration will be supplied with the officially modified flavors of eumacs and neuvim.














