• 0 Posts
  • 55 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 11th, 2024

help-circle


  • You CANT split sport into “performance classes”, at least not in a way where it would help - men would on average still be in the higher “performance class” and nothing would change.

    Don’t we already? In high school you have freshmen, jv, and varsity sports. There’s recreational, amateur, and professional leagues in about every sport. There’s weight classes in wrestling and boxing. Just to name a few examples of where we have no problem breaking sport into performance classes.




  • May be similar to the 3d software world where autodesk created a monopoly and could charge around 5k USD for something like Maya, and then go the adobe route and only rent once innovation dies off. Only when Blender started getting more hype and attention did autodesk start offering cheaper indie versions and licenses.












  • What nonsense? Look it up in a thesaurus.

    Yes, people want skilled professionals. Who says they shouldn’t? They should also care about a system that favors a dominant class largely because of historic access to (stolen) capital. After all, that would reduce competition and competency.

    What’s being implied by bringing up “merit” as antithetical to DEI is that you can’t trust people outside of the dominant class to do the work competently. If that were the case, the problem is not DEI, it’s upstream: fair access to education and opportunities, but I don’t hear DEI opponents crying about that.