• shane@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    You’re asking people working for the non-profit to accept lower pay of tens of thousands of dollars? Do basically because someone doesn’t make a personal sacrifice of a significant fraction of their salary you’re not willing to help at all?

    I don’t like or accept this logic.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Now I wonder, because both 999k and 100k are six figure sums, and one of them I find much more reasonable than the other.

      But yeah, running a non-profit often takes money instead of earning you money, and if they have spare money to pay salary to the CEO, maybe they’re all right

      • bobgobbler@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s not what being a non profit means… they are allowed to make a “profit,” and pay for their liabilities. They just must reinvest them back into the business.