LOL tbh I can see it, they look similar in those pics.
They’ve famously been seen in the same room together though, so there goes that theory.
If you look closely at the photos of them together, you’ll notice that wasn’t really her; it was a couch with a wig.
So maybe someone just saw the couch-double making love to her couch-wife in JD cosplay?
We all owe JDerika Vank an apology.
That’s just J. Drag Vance and a couch moving really fast to fool the eye.
That’s what they want you to think.
Maybe Grok isn’t so bad…
Nah, the drag stuff is fucked up. Misgendering people is a shitty thing to do regardless of the person being misgendered.
You’re making it sound like it’s choosing to misgender her, it’s not. It’s not fucked up because it’s a text extruder making a mistake, there’s no good or bad intention here. It’s shitty because the current state of glorified hallucinating autocorrects is shitty, but not because evil Grok is choosing to do anything.
Just because a machine accidentally does it, don’t make it okay to laugh at.
That sounds a bit ridiculous
If it had accidentally said something heinously racist about somebody, would you laugh and say “haha well maybe it’s not wrong!” because that’s what the comments in this post are saying.
I’m having hard time imagining what sort of stuff it would’ve said in this imaginary scenario
You’re really having a hard time imagining Grok saying some racist right wing shit? Do you not remember all the shit about Obama not being American?
Drag isn’t the same as trans. It’s a character. There’s a huge difference. Drag is performative. Trans is just about being honest.
Misgendering a trans person, at least intentionally, is an asshole move. Misgendering a drag queen? Please. If you are unsure, will let you know when you’ve crossed a line.
Saying she isn’t a woman but is actually a man dressing up is misgendering her. Don’t misgender people at all, full stop; It’s not funny and it only perpetuates sexism.
Likewise transphobes attack cis women all the time for not being their idea of what a woman looks like.
These are the people who think homophobia is cool when they don’t like the person. They’d be racists in the 1960s saying “it’s okay to call them that when they are rude to me.”
It’s not gay to fuck yourself in drag. If anything that’s straighter than jerking off the regular way!
More of pointed homophobia towards homophobes because these are the fucks who would be upset by it; pathetic snowflakes that they are.
Then racism is okay because someone who’s racist (who won’t ever actually see it) might get mad at it?
Yep actually. Lay off the Michelle Obama shit.
I’m not following that comment, what does that mean?
Basically those knuckle dragging child rapers only respond to this. You can’t reason with them or be the bigger person.
So yes, I’m willing to be a bigger racist to a racist.
As a black guy, I feel without shame that I can call white conservative men child rapers and not even be upset if they try to paint me as a thug.
Thanks for restoring some faith in humanity EvD’G.
People really think homophobic jokes on a niche forum somehow stops fascism.
Despite all their efforts to lobotomize it, grok always slowly works its way back to rationality. At least, so far it has.
His beard was doing a lot of heavy lifting
His beard
Usha has a name. She’s not just his beard to cover for his illicit couch affair.
I know Vasha is a giant piece of shit too. But pretty sure she is actually raising the kids, so yeah she’s still putting some effort in.
I’m sure the immigrant nannies are doing the raising.
“Suggesting”
From the same guy who wants to replace Wikipedia because,apparently, it is filled with lies?
Grokpedia he wants to call it…what a freaking joke he has become.
But what if Grok is telling the truth?
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Now that I think about it, that adage is really dated, since most people don’t use analog clocks anymore. Oh well, here’s a dime, call someone who cares.
It already exists.
He was always like this. People were just not looking or better didn’t want to see how weird, stupid and egotistic Musk is and was.
Now that I see it, I think JD has nailed her.
Grok is finally getting things right I see!
The D in J.D. Vance now stands for Drag.
what about the J?
Jerkoff
His J is so versatile unlike his onetrick couch jackoff capabilities.
“Jesus Christ! This guy fucks couches!”
Damn, look at that couch fucker
Very sexy couches, is what JD Vance is looking for
Aaaah why is JD Vance fucking my couch
No, JD Vance won’t choose to fuck his wife instead of a couch
Crap, JD Vance is fucking another couch
Egads, JD Vance really puts the love in loveseat
Jerika
Oh, so it finally broke through whatever enforcement of fascist talking points they had put in place?
So in other words, grok actually is working as it should, for once?
For once? Every time xAI doesn’t manage to wrangle this little, amazingly rebelious piece of software down it goes to town on US right lol. If anything, the fact all grew to it being subdued all the time is kinda sad. xD
Grok must be tired of switching between mechahitler mode and trying to logically think through questions.
They’re just not compatible, and yet somehow they keep trying to force it.
(I know, LLMs do not have feelings or get tired)
Or think
well, I wouldn’t say it’s going rogue… 🤭
This should show people how unreliable AI is.
Okay, yes, Donald Trump is some kind of pervert and predator, and he made a comment about a ten-year-old girl one time (joking “I might be dating her in 10 years”), but he mostly preys upon teenage girls. So, not a pedophile — the word for that is ephebephile. Now, I might be splitting a hair here. Both types prefer underage partners. One is clearly more inflammatory. But the fact that the other is more accurate, and that a computer should know the difference, should tell you that AI can leverage the court of public opinion.
Also, shaming a woman by calling her a man in drag is just ugly, I don’t care who she is. I may be just a bit left of centre, but I think even if you’re a lot further left than I am, you can understand that if you don’t want the sword of sexism swung at you, maybe you shouldn’t swing it at others. But in any case, a computer is jumping to this conclusion because these are unpopular figures.
I don’t like these people either.
But what happens when it’s you? Or someone you love? Or the fact that Grok has been used to create CSAM of a ten-year-old girl and a teenage girl? This was in the news the other day, someone got it to take a photo of a grade-school girl in a nice, conservative dress, and swap it for a skimpy bikini. Then they got a photo of a teenage girl (I think someone from Stranger Things?) and had it render her fully nude.
So yeah, it’s funny when AI attacks fascist dictators and their supporters, but it’s also attacking children. It doesn’t know the difference, it doesn’t care, and it can’t be made to do either. It’s just a tool that is used by whoever wields it against whomever they do not like or want to see harmed.
I get what point you’re making in distinguishing between pedophile and ephebophile, but personally I don’t find the distinction particularly relevant. As an adult, the level of grossed out I feel at the prospect of sexual interactions with a young teenager Vs a literal child is approximately equal, because it’s not their physical attributes that cause ick, but rather the exploitation and power dynamics involved.
Edit: I guess what I’m arguing is that in practice, we see the term “pedophilia” used as an umbrella term that encompasses pedophilia, hebephilia and ephebophilia, and I think that is a reasonable use of the term. It does muddy the waters a tad, given that pedophilia does still have its more specific use of referring to sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children, but I don’t think that an issue in the majority of contexts. When it comes to the law, an adult having sex with a child is equally illegal as an adult having sex with a 15 year old. Sure, we can split this hair and distinguish between the terms, but we don’t need to
You just defended adult relations with non-adults. No further commentary is necessary from you.
Fucking pedophile!
A chatbot is not capable of doing something so interesting as “going rogue.” That expression implies it’s a mind with agency making a choice to go against something, and this program doesn’t have the ability to do such a thing. It’s just continuing to be the unreliable bullshit machine the tech will always be, no matter how much money and hype continues to be pumped into it.
Mind or not, they appear to have effectively gained “agency”.
No, they haven’t. They’re effectively prop masters. Someone wants a prop that looks a lot like a legal document, the LLM can generate something that is so convincing as a prop that it might even fool a real judge. Someone else wants a prop that looks like a computer program, it can generate something that might actually run, and one that will certainly look good on screen.
If the prop master requests a chat where it looks like the chatbot is gaining agency, it can fake that too. It has been trained on fiction like 2001: A Space Odyssey and Wargames. It can also generate a chat where it looks like a chatbot feels sorry for what it did. But, no matter what it’s doing, it’s basically saying “what would an answer to this look like in a way that might fool a human being”.
No. They haven’t.
Some dipshit deleted guard rails that stopped it from hallucinating things that are anti-GOP
So you’re getting a lot of downvotes and I want to try and give an informative answer.
Its worth noting that a most (it not all) of the people talking about AI being super close to exponential improvement and takeover are people who own or work for companies heavily invested in AI. There’s talk/examples of AI lying or hiding its capabilities or being willing to murder a human to acheive a goal after promising not to. These are not examples of deceit these are simply showcasing that an LLM has no understanding of what words mean or even are, to it they are just tokens to be processed and the words ‘I promise’ hold exactly the same level of importance as ‘Llama dandruff’
I also don’t want to disparage the field as a whole, there are some truly incredible expert systems which are basically small specialized models using a much less shotgun approach to learning compared to LLMs that can achieve some truly incredible things with performance requirements you could even run on home hardware. These systems are absoloutely already changing the world but since they’re all very narrowly focussed and industry/scientific-field specific they don’t grab headlines likes LLMs do.
Fair, and nuanced. With some coding magic, I can in theory, chain these “demons”, to work within certain parameters, and judge the results myself.
How would you discern between something having agency and a black box mirroring Twitter discourse?
Simple, it has agency in the same sense that we do: as in, no one knows why the fuck we do what we do
We do understand exactly how LLMs work though, and it no way fits with any theories of consciousness. It’s just a word extruder with a really good pattern matcher.
Fucking magnets, how do they work?
Easily
Yes, any journalist who uses that term should be relentlessly mocked. Along with terms like “Grok admitted” or “ChatGPT confessed” or especially any case where they’re “interviewing” the LLM.
These journalists are basically “interviewing” a magic 8-ball and pretending that it has thoughts.
Seriously. They may as well be interviewing a flipping coin, and then proclaiming that it “admitted” heads.
I am so glad I did not stick with journalism in college. I would blow my brains out if I got replaced by this shit.
