171-inch doesn’t make any sense in this context.
We know it’s 1080p, but what resolution ? In other words, how far does that supposedly “171 inch” TV sit from your face ?
Say that second sentence again, but slowly.
I meant definition. Aka pixels per centimeter squared.
Right? 1080p is literally resolution of 1920x1080.
Maybe they meant to say Dot Pitch?
I meant definition.
“like sitting in front of a whopping 171-inch display from four meters away”
mmmm. these kinda look like you could wear them with a pair of glasses behind them.
They come with a thing you can put prescription lenses in, so maybe!
I’m kind of interested depending on pricing. Using it as a monitor would be neat too
I’m on my third pair, the Viture pro, 120hz / 1080p oled and I think they’re pretty neat. Particularly Viture’s individual dials for your eyes if you’re a little near sighted. Had the Xreal before, maybe they got better but after going and and getting the lense inserts adjusted to my prescription by an optometrist, (which took a couple weeks and cost an additional ~$100) they still were just a little off which sucks for text- the fuzzies manifest differently with minute differences in distance from your eyes, so they all kinda clamp on your head and it hurts before long without a hat or something to better distribute the pressure. Ymmv, I’d still recommend if you’re at all a techie. No discernable pixels whatsoever and they’ve been easy enough to buy n sell used ^_^
These things always have light isolation issues. It’s why the google glass failed and why Apple and Microsoft tried to do AR based on a VR headset instead of glasses like this.
No, that’s not why Google Glass failed. It would have failed even with a perfect display.
May save you a click:
No price yet, similar products have launched at $699
