• Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Fucking GOOD. We need these useless companies to fail out and be held responsible for their actions.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Fuck Facebook and also this is clearly morphing into a moral panic about social media in a way that is extremely unproductive, dangerous and ultimately a distraction from the actual issues at hand.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      moral panic about social media in a way that is extremely unproductive, dangerous and ultimately a distraction from the actual issues at hand.

      100%. Yeah that’s the point. If there’s any alternative narrative, hegemony stirs up a panic then takes over control.

      Just look at what happened with TikTok. A bunch of obvious fascists started up a campaign. A bunch of liberals and other obvious fascists took it over… Now we have fash tiktok.

      The people foaming at the mouth in this comm want to do it all over again with every form of “social media”. It’s gonna be rich when they come for Lemmy.

    • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      nah… mark is clearly an international drug dealer and needs to have all his property seized, and then destroyed while he rots in prison.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Billionaires are running the most popular social media sites and utilizing the algorithm to attempt to influence their addicted userbase on a large scale, and succeeded on many demographics and even win elections.

      I don’t think it is a stretch to call it a moral panic, because its not an unbiased and transparent system that is dictating what is seen and spread. It is a huge black box propganda tool.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Except the propaganda mostly isn’t what the “social media addiction” folks are worrying about.

        • Lfrith@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Even people who don’t care about usage of propaganda are affected, since these social media addicted folks have brought up how they are getting more unrelated propaganda content exposed to them even if all they want to see is cats and food recipes as an example.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not sure if you’re trying to argue that modern social media is a good thing… Because it really isn’t. All of these platforms are actively detrimental to our mental health and destabilizing society. All of them have their billionaire owners manipulating the algorithms to maximize what they want you to see and minimize opposing views, if not outright removing them (like Meta is doing with the ICE List currently).

        • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Humans have been killing each other as long as we’ve existed isn’t an argument to avoid trying to make it happen less

          • IronBird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            just saying billionaires manipulating shit has been the norm for ages, which is why we used to have media-ownership limits…repealed under Clinton iirc

            • pipi1234@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Agreed, but now they have tools that enable them to do it with unprecedented impact.

              In my opinion, the difference is so huge, we might as well think they didn’t manipulate things at all before.

              • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Agreed, but now they have tools that enable them to do it with unprecedented impact.

                Yes tools like TikTok that libs lobbied to hand to fascists. Now they want more of the same.

            • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah, by memory Rupert Murdoch had his hand at that and in Aus and the UK. I’d love to see that reined in again too

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Murder =/= social media.

            It’s pretty sad that I have to say this. People are really losing their minds of this “social media” hype.

        • RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          No, news networks are not algorithmically curating content specifically for each individual person, based on personal traits that they record based on usage.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yes they are. That’s what Fox news does. It curates content specifically for their wacky users.

            Whether they use an “algorithm” or not is a meaningless difference based on luddism.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        All of these platforms are actively detrimental to our mental health and destabilizing society.

        According to you? How do you feel about the TikTok takeover? Anxiously awaiting the same for Lemmy?

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Massive corporate social media companies and rightwing billionaires are the problem, not social media.

        Not sure if you’re trying to argue that modern social media is a good thing… Because it really isn’t.

        What are you doing here then?

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Lemmy might fit within the technical definition of social media, but don’t be so obtuse as to equate an anonymous community message board with the likes of Facebook and IG that are tied to your identity, and are designed algorithmically to keep you engaged as long as possible and pressuring you to share more and more of your personal life.

          The “If social media bad, why on Lemmy?” Is the epitome of halfwit false equivalency.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Lemmy might fit within the technical definition of social media, but don’t be so obtuse as to equate an anonymous community message board with the likes of Facebook and IG that are tied to your identity, and are designed algorithmically to keep you engaged as long as possible while pressuring you to share more and more of your personal life.

            then use your brain and analyze this deeper than social media = bad

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Nobody is interested in seriously engaging with your sophomoric “you criticize society yet you participate in it” nonsense. We get it, you’re 14 and think you’re deep.

              • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Great and I am not interested in being subjected to a moral panic that feels like the logic was laid out by grifters trying to distract from their grift by manipulating gullible idiots to empower them even more.

              • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Y’all are literally calling for this website to be banned for the sake of pseudo-science.

                Lots of people are interested in this. Y’all are actively helping the worst.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Lemmy might fit within the technical definition of social media, but don’t be so obtuse as to equate an anonymous community message board with the likes of Facebook and IG that are tied to your identity,

            Do you really think the state and its fascists care about this differentiation?

            They will literally come after Lemmy the first chance that they get. Far more so than insiders like zuck, musk, etc.

            And it will be at least partially a result of y’all libs calling for it based on this wacky pseudo-science.

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Who is downvoting this? jfc…

          People here are rabid about this “social media” but give a pass to literal fascism.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    pondered letting “tweens” access a private mode inspired by the popularity of fake Instagram accounts teens know as “finstas.” That document included an “internal discussion on how to counter the narrative that Facebook is bad for youth and admission that internal data shows that Facebook use is correlated with lower well-being (although it says the effect reverses longitudinally).” Other allegedly damning documents showed Meta seemingly bragging that “teens can’t switch off from Instagram even if they want to” and an employee declaring, “oh my gosh yall IG is a drug,” likening all social media platforms to “pushers.” Similarly, a 2020 Google document detailed the company’s plan to keep kids engaged “for life,” despite internal research showing young YouTube users were more likely to “disproportionately” suffer from “habitual heavy use, late night use, and unintentional use” deteriorating their “digital well-being.” Shorts, YouTube’s feature that rivals TikTok, also is a concern for parents suing, and three years later, documents showed Google choosing to target teens with Shorts, despite research flagging that the “two biggest challenges for teen wellbeing on YouTube” were prominently linked to watching shorts. Those challenges included Shorts bombarding teens with “low quality content recommendations that can convey & normalize unhealthy beliefs or behaviors” and teens reporting that “prolonged unintentional use” was “displacing valuable activities like time with friends or sleep.”

  • TheFederatedPipe@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It really is! I was off for about three months, and I decided to go back to it just to be up-to-date with some friends and creators, right? Well, I was doom-scrolling for hours in about just a week of usage. Whenever that happens, I uninstall the app causing it, so I just deleted it again. The craziest part? After a couple of hours, I could feel the craving to open the app. Crazy shit.

    • SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I use instaDM. I am not able to see what other people post unless I go to their profile, but default won’t show it anyway most of the time as it will mainly give short content videos so I just removed the feed altogether

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Zuck has kissed the ring. He will be fine. You can all stop worrying about him now. Barbecue sauce.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s just a news bite. He or yuckbook has never ever really been in trouble. It’s vital tool for global surveillance.

      Remember Cambridge analytica?rohingya genocide? and other countless controversies?

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        You do not realize how far the us will descend into madness if they fix elections securely. Zuck is safe, for now.

        His money will make him a target though. But mark my words, the oligarchy will rue the day they supported a one-party State taking over.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s okay though because Zuck greased the Trump admin’s palms with his Presidential Library bribe, so they’ll get a slap on the wrist at best.

  • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    That lawsuit documents the case of a 19-year-old, K.G.M, who hopes the jury will agree that Meta and YouTube caused psychological harm by designing features like infinite scroll and autoplay to push her down a path that she alleged triggered depression, anxiety, self-harm, and suicidality.

    What the hell is everyone watching? YT recommends me Red Letter Media, Veratasium, old movies, Blender tutorials and a bunch of other stuff that’s never going to drive me to self-harm. I don’t understand. May be this woman doesn’t have ad blocker installed and is forced to sit through a bunch of soul crushing PSAs? Why is my experience so drastically different from this?

    • TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      You like these channels so you had the luck of having a positive bias in your feed. But i have direct experiences of youtube feeling me alt right content, mainly alpha male and trawife crap. Escalating this any further would lead who knows were. There is more negative content than positive online. I’m progressively more online than ever, this being the last social media i have. The truth is that i want to bring the use of this device to a minimal low, moving every useful resource offline if i can. In general, even with positive content, infinite scrollong is questionable at the very least.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        But it should also be noted, teenagers are particularly targeted by and vulnerable to such messaging. In my 30s I can look around and see the evidence against such comparisons, but at 16 I was just some kid who worried she’d never be attractive or well liked. Had I been in spaces that encouraged such attitudes such as Instagram or 4chan I would have been really vulnerable to it.

        Young people are often overly worried about such things because adolescence is a difficult and transitory stage where these worries are developmentally appropriate. They’re supposed to have adults who can help them deal with this, and peers that they can learn by interacting with, but it’s normal to not believe your parents on such issues and interactions with peers has been moved online with social media and there’s little interaction with adults. This has led room for teenagers to be preyed on by algorithms that encourage their worst instincts and online communities that teach anything from antisocial behavior to masochistic epistemology.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Watching those hack frauds causes psychological harm. Rich Evans is known to trigger depression

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Truth is these people watch garbage and the algo delivers… garbage.

      I’m not trying to victim blame but, i mean… not my YouTube either (but I’ve seen the front pages of some…stupid people too say it nicely).

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Meanwhile my girlfriend and I just got done watching a 2 hour video on Japans creepiest educational video, subject of which is the Heian era of Japan. Her algorithm pulls are goated.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Algorithms try to push body negativity if it thinks you’re a teen girl because they tend to scroll more and buy more if you’re depressed.

      If it thinks you’re a single man then it tries to push manosphere stuff.

      On YouTube I find I my relevant suggestions last about a month before I have to mark a bunch of videos as not interested or block a bunch of channels.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        On a podcast I was listening to a researcher had made an account and subscribed to just like technology and sports and within a few months they had him on like manisphere stuff with tate and those types of assholes

        • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I get some manosphere stuff for the same reason, but mostly ignore it. At the risk of getting beat up here, I like Joe Rogan. His celebrity interviews are entertaining and I like wacky subjects like UFOs and such which he covers. Plus I’m a gamer so I watch videos about guns frequently because I find that fascinating though I don’t want to own one. So that’s why I’ll get recommended manisphere stuff. And I’ll get curious and take a look at those videos, and get more recommendations. But when I stop watching them, they go away. My recommendations are based on whatever I’m interested in at the time.

          Everybody talks about Andrew Tate but I have never ever seen any of his videos. Him or Mr. Beast. They never get recommended. I only know about Tate because everybody everywhere else is complaining about him. So I don’t what that researcher did to get that.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah there was a period where it noticed I watched a few trans youtubers and so it started promoting anti trans content, it was around the election (I forget if before or after), but either way it disgusted me that they’d do that

      • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Algorithms aren’t that smart. Maybe there needs to be general education about how they work so people will understand that viewing a video is like searching for a topic in google so people will understand how much control over what they see and use the technology appropriately.

        If you watch a video about anorexia that’s like typing “Anorexia” in Google or pressing 9 on a remote control, you’re getting channel 9. That’s why to me this sounds crazy. It’s like someone complaining their TV keeps pushing the cooking channel at them.

          • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sure, google knows I’m a 50+ year old man but YT isn’t pushing me a bunch of videos about retirement and how to keep the damn kids off my lawn. If I made a new account and it knew nothing about me, it might. But right now it knows I’m interested in obscure early 20th Century comic books and early 70s horror anthology shows.

            Edit:

            I misunderstood what you said. I use ad blocker so I don’t see ads. Sometimes they get through and it’s always Wix. That is kind of a mystery to me.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Disable YT history. Make YT Subscriptions page your home page. Now all you see are the most recent videos from your subscribed channels. You can keep up with them without being distracted by garbage suggestions. It’s a much better experience.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I just block the side-bar using Ublock Origin. Makes more room on the page and im not sold shit. If I want random videos ill hit the home page the post-screen after a video.

        Keeps my time down on the site by a lot.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t know man… I found so many nice channels randomly… Kurzgesagt, science asylum so many great educational channels that just pop up

  • Affidavit@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    What a bunch of nonsensical slop.

    Can we please hate billionaires without being absolute nincompoops?

    Please? You people are really making us look like fucking idiots.

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Notice of class-action settlement: your cash payout has arrived, 83¢ has been deposited on a Meta giftcard in your name.”

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Just send a written letter with your name, bday, ss no., mothers maiden name, address, and return a signed copy of the nda agreement barring you from speaking of the case, our company, lawyers, and holding us harmless. The gift card for .88 dollars will arrive within 6 to 8 weeks, visit www.fuckyouthatswhy.com to activate!