you’re right, firstly, と can’t be used on its own like that to mean “and”, then 我の is not a thing, it’s 我が but really it should have been 僕の or something
and I think it should have been either 明かすな or 明かさないで, 明かさない is just plain negative
我のdefinitely is a thing (ware no), especially if you’re someone important like a daimyo. And と言いました is correct because you’re quoting (or reporting) something another has said.
Edit: oh I guess the speaker isn’t the daimyo. In any case, ware-no is grammatically correct.
I learned Japanese so I could read stuff like this.
Per AI translation : " I have already told the daimyo that I am truly sorry ! And you said you would not reveal my affair to the public !! "
Pls share :(
The Apple translate thingie says:
Me too!
Also, I might be mistaken, but I think this is poorly worded in japanese
you’re right, firstly, と can’t be used on its own like that to mean “and”, then 我の is not a thing, it’s 我が but really it should have been 僕の or something
and I think it should have been either 明かすな or 明かさないで, 明かさない is just plain negative
我のdefinitely is a thing (ware no), especially if you’re someone important like a daimyo. And と言いました is correct because you’re quoting (or reporting) something another has said.
Edit: oh I guess the speaker isn’t the daimyo. In any case, ware-no is grammatically correct.
Especially because they’re trying to emulate the samurai dialect. It’s inaccurate, but deserves points for trying!
Yeah, I’m not sure either but it does look a little odd.
Would edo period Japanese even have exclamation marks?