Meta has been granted a patent outlining an AI system capable of simulating a user’s activity on social media to post after their death.

Some fucked up shit.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Get grieving relatives hooked on talking to bots, then sell them subscriptions to keep the bots running

    • [object Object]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Prime time to remind that Meta probably cranks out five hundred patents every day in case they ever have to engage in patent warfare against competitors. For the simple reason that the competitors are doing the same thing.

      The patents cover every little thing under the sun that they can think of, but oddly I don’t see each of those patents discussed online.

  • LEM 1689@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ancestral AI. The ancients will be angry to be left voiceless, only modern ancestors admitted.

  • astraeus@lemmy.mldeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    not even death will stop your family members from sending you fake news articles

  • Novis@lemdro.iddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s fucking… why would a patent office let that be a thing? FUCK

      • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Judge Todd Lang of Maricopa County Superior Court ultimately sentenced Pelkey’s killer Gabriel Paul Horcasitas to 10.5 years for manslaughter — although the state had asked for only 9.5 years — and 12.5 years in total, including an endangerment charge.

        “I love that AI. Thank you for that,” Lang said, a recording of the hearing shows.

        WTF.

        • Novis@lemdro.iddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, ain’t it great that judges can be easily swayed by some bullshit? Good country, ethics really well here.

        • Novis@lemdro.iddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          What? Come on! It made the judge “feel” something! Not like someone’s died or something! /s

      • dellish@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        How is that even admissible in court? It’s worse than hearsay, it’s madeupsay.

        If your honour pleases, we have used AI to turn this child’s crayon drawing into the defendant pleading guilty! I’ll allow it.

        For fucks sake.

    • turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The job of the patent office is to determine whether that’s a valid patent application or not. As in, can you actually patent that thing, has someone else already patented it etc. As long as it’s technically valid, it gets approved. It’s up to the patent holder to test if its actually useful or not. If they choose to build the thing IRL, it’s up to the courts to determine if that breaks any laws. Every step along the way, the general public is there to judge the moral integrity of said invention, but usually that has no impact on the validity of the patent. Depending on jurisdiction, the patent office may need to follow some moral guielines, but the threshold of rejection is very high. My guess is, you won’t be able to patent a gas chamber for exterminating “illegal immigrants”, but patenting wild Meta BS is technically fine.

      See also: this abomination

  • Artwork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Oh no no no no no…
    Please, God, Gods, or whoever, no…

    I absolutely don’t want my descendants to talk with some void-empty limited bloody-meatground utter nonsense… I don’t want that freaking awful mess of terribly limited data to talk with my children or their children possibly framing and damaging their true memories and genuine confidence in me I had been developing the whole life… I don’t want them to remember the algorithm or some imitation of me talking with a machine or some chat bot… no… never… please no… PLEASE NO…
    No…
    No…
    Never…
    No…

    Some limited inhuman stupid chat/voice/avatar/anything bot? No…
    Some bot that may erroneously represent me behind my back?
    Never…
    Some nonsense that may reshape memories of my ancestors?
    No…
    Never…
    No…

    If I am dead, I am dead. I want my descendants to just remember me, talk to me in their memories, real videos, audios, and photos, my effort, my ideas and love in artwork if ever they’ll be interested… and once in a while visit the grave, at least 2-3 times per their life, if ever possible… and that’s it…

    If I am dead, I am dead as my ancestors are, who are not dead for me being alive but in my memories or something more magnificent/supernatural, and how I remember them, where they wanted to be the best they could, respected, glorified, and admired, without disturbing them in memories, soul, and the heart they gifted me, who I will always appreciate, respect, and love…

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because of course they did. Not only did they think this was a good idea, they patented it! Ghouls.

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sounds like I’ll need to include account deletion as a part of my will.

    • electrotabby@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I deleted (not deactivated) my account back in 2014. In 2022 I tried logging in and found my profile exactly as I left it, nothing gone…

      • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Only way to delete your account properly is to never have made one or let ignorant people post YOUR image to FB

          • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            ikr, luckily every time I check I still have no ghost FB account nor can I find myself on google.

            Took a course at college in '12 and one of the classes the assignment was to search for ourselves online, the prof clearly stated that “I couldn’t find myself” was not an acceptable outcome. So when I went to deliver the news that I was going to get a zero because in 30+ pages of google I could not find any mentions of myself, I was the first and prolly only person to get full marks on that assignment

              • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Oh I did find many many with similar names, but nothing that indicated me. It was fun and I did expect him to give me zero on it, but when one does not have social media one has difficulty finding oneself online hehe

            • morriscox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I suspect that the professor was trying to make it so that people would put some effort in instead of just giving up and lying.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It might have some applications. Upon reflection, I just realized that deaths are public information. Many people use social media under a psudonym. If someone dies and stops using social media at the same time, that’s a pretty potent piece of information to deanonymize them (though they also might not care all that much, being dead). If Meta has a patent, nobody else is allowed to do that. I suppose it could give them a certain edge.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Great. So now Facebook can become a literal ghost town.

    I wonder how advertisers paying for ads on Facebook feel about paying to advertise to dead people?

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t care how advertisers feel. I’ve been telling them for decades that their ads have zero effect on me. That it just pisses me off.

      When I go into a grocery store, I have a list. If it’s not on that list, I’m not buying it. The list was prepared weeks ago, and added as I run out of things. Doesn’t matter if you show 100 ads. I’m not paying attention. Even though you paid money to show the ad, I still didn’t see it. What difference does it make if I’m alive? Either way I didn’t see the…uh…what were you selling again? It was a commercial for Jesus? See, this just shows how little I pay atttention to ads. I saw the superbowl, and I’m fairly sure one of the commercials was for Jesus. I’m unclear how one would buy Jesus, but that was the ad.

      Tell ya what advertiser industry. I’m going to do your job for you. I’m going to make sure every single person pays attention to every ad you ever put out. Are you ready for this? Here we go.

      The screen fades in from black to a closeup of some tittys. They’re bouncing around, and women are moaning. Then they start moaning “OOOOOHHHH, YEEEAAAAHHHH BUY OUR PRODUCT, BUY THE PRODUCT! OOOOHHHHH!”

      Remember, tittys are still bouncing. You put the product in the center of the screen.

      You just made a billion dollars!

      • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The screen fades in from black to a closeup of some tittys. They’re bouncing around, and women are moaning. Then they start moaning “OOOOOHHHH, YEEEAAAAHHHH BUY OUR PRODUCT, BUY THE PRODUCT! OOOOHHHHH!”

        Idiocracy was a great documentary of our future.

        • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Being influenced by ads is not some moral failing.

          I really doubt people who think they have some special willpower to resist advertising. Advertising isnt simply “go buy this particular thing”. Brand recognition alone is very powerful.

          The person you replied to thinks their shopping list is somehow immune to advertising, i highly doubt it. The lack of self awareness makes me think they are MORE susceptible to ads than the average person.

          • OwOarchist@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            The person you replied to thinks their shopping list is somehow immune to advertising

            Yep. They only buy things on their list, okay.

            So which brand of that thing are you going to buy? The one you recognize most and are most familiar with, maybe?

          • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Speaking solely for myself, I have accepted that I am as susceptible to marketing and propaganda as any other human, in an age where we are surrounded by it, none of it honest, none of it in my own best interest.

            My response to this has been to cut off all possible routes of advertising: I literally do not watch or read anything that has ads, except possibly passing billboards and in-store ads. I don’t play games that have ads. I don’t listen to radio. I have adblocker on everything, or I simply leave. I can’t stand ads, and I have cut them out of everything I can. I’d genuinely rather quit a service than submit to ads. (And yes, I do love just plain silence, whenever I can get it.)

            So yeah, I’m immune: they can’t influence me if they can’t get access. That’s the best kind of immunity there is.

            • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              The reason i adblock the shit out of everything is not because i think i’m smarter than everyone, it’s because i KNOW i’m susceptible to these things.

              What you’re describing is not immunity, but an avoidance strategy. Almost nobody is truly immune to ads, thats why we avoid exposure

              Nobody is immune to HIV, so we avoid exposure

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Thought experiment: near 100% of facebook users are such bots. Watch them interact with each other unfettered and see where it mutates.

      Bonus interview with the one real facebook user left.