Same as electricity & magnetism exist in the electromagnetic-field,
probabilitywaves have to exist IN something, therefore there IS a probability-field, exactly as there IS an information-field, a gravitational-field, an electromagnetic-field, etc.
& yes, the probability-field & the information-field are actually a single 2-D field:
the infoprobability-field
That means that there are, as particle-properties:
- mass
- charge
- spin
- infoprobability, an immaterial ( in a “hidden”/“curled” dimension! ) property that measurably alters its behavior )
The peculiar thing is, though, it’s got “gas”=future/“liquid”=present/“solid”=past states, & I don’t understand what that borks in Physicalism’s physics-model.
( just putting this out so people who want to, can dig into the meaning on your own:
I’d rather keep digging-up new meaniings than socialize, so now you know about the meaning, too, & it’s not outside your ability to be considering, anymore ( I hate paywalled “science”/extortion, & feel identically about philosophy, AND about not-publishing discoveries, as Feynman too-frequently did, too.
Now the concept’s published, now ignoring-that-it’s-real-property-in-actual-field can cease false-framing the discussion, globally.
: )
Since I’m incompetent in calculus, I can’t help anybody further.
I’ll check back later, to see if the discussion put meaning-gems into view, so I get to own them, too, & learn how I’m wrong. : )
Salut, Namaste, & Kaizen
_ /\ _
Now that the concept’s published
Would you care to share this supposed publication? A link, DOI number, or even the title of the paper would do.
Also, for your edification: How to Use Em Dashes (—), En Dashes (–) , and Hyphens (-). Slapping dashes in between random, unrelated words does not do anything to aid you in sounding coherent or intelligent.
probabilitywaves have to exist IN something, therefore there IS a probability-field
Probability amplitudes are directly derived (via the Born rule) from wave functions in quantum fields (electron field, proton field, etc.) That’s the medium probability propagates through—not a separate probability field.
The phases of matter (solid, liquid, and gas) are derived from the relative strengths of kinetic energy vs various types of electromagnetic interactions, on a much larger scale.
Time and information are derived from coarse-graining microstates into macrostates on a larger scale yet. Those are all pretty distinct processes.
Needs more timecube.
Can we have actual science questions instead of schizophrenic rants please?
Man, that’s a difference between:
- a scientific model (a description of reality), like the Schrodinger equation,
- the interpretation of the model like Copenhagen interpretation, Many Worlds interpretation
And the reality itself.
And your post seems to mix this 3 distinct things. As far as I can understand, this is not even wrong.
If you want to refine your view, I would suggest you to propose (and actually do) some experiment, try to prove it wrong. The best result to expect is a better model; the worst, you can work and make your interpretation more coherent with the model and the reality.
