Me: Cars
Mindcontrol
deleted by creator
Animal agriculture.
Meta
Easy question:
AI
Net negative pushing us toward unavoidable global ecosystem collapse: it produces nothing but the unfulfilled promise of eventually replacing human workers, which it has never shown the capability to do and according to the researchers who founded the AI companies will never do due to “AI Scaling Laws”. It has increased power consumption and costs by over 30% in some US States.
Religion. So many of today’s issues stem from the magical thinking inherent in religion.
It’s easily disprovable, but even in the face of countless arguments against it, people still willingly throw themselves into it by the millions. They’re too fearful of the unknown, they’re fearful of belonging somewhere when we die and religion is the prime example of how easily controllable people are when they’re fearful.
Amen
So far crypto currencies. So far they seem to expend a huge amount of electricity and used mostly for speculation.
nuclear weapons, too feckin dangerous to have
I’m in mixed mind about them because you’re right, they’re too destructive, but for the time being their existence has prevented conflicts from breaking out, and since wars are typically only waged with the promise of financing it afterwards via looting or expansion, nobody is really willing to render land unusable in the process of conquering it.
This is a good point I never considered before.
That comment is the first time you’ve considered MAD? I mean, congrats on being one of today’s lucky 10,000, but I’m surprised you didn’t learn about it in school.
When it’s presented in school, it is presented as thing of the past and localised to how Russia and America treated/still treat one another, rather than threading the needle by explaining that it still applies today. I’m pretty sure I only picked up on it after reading online explanations/justifications of nukes.
Or in other words people focus on the panic of it so much that they don’t stop to think of it as a good thing
TBF I think even without Nukes we wouldn’t have war between big countries. Because the UN would discourage it. Ukraine being a big exception to that
The problem is that it only takes one ruler insane enough to use them to wipe out most of humanity.
You’re right. But if that ruler does decide to nuke a city or something, the next bomb to drop will probably be where said ruler is.
It will inevitably happen. One day a dumb enough ruler will use it.
But what happens next? Do we just stop there, apologize and go back to our normal lives?
And you’re probably right, the next bomb would destroy that ruler, but only if the receiver has nukes as well. If he doesn’t, who’s going to do anything to defend/avange him? No one wants to enter an nuclear war.
The reciever doesn’t need nukes. I live in Canada and we don’t have any. But the threat of retaliation from our allies that do protect us from that threat.
If Trump decides to launch a nuke at Vancouver, which of your allies are bold enough to send one his way?
The US probably since they’ll also be nuking part of their own country if they did that. The fallout would 100% affect Washington.
Except the part where we have exhaustive evidence that nukes do not always render land unusable.
Nagasaki and Hiroshima are entirely fine. The radiation levels were back at safe levels in days. Yes, we definitely fucked up a lot of land with nuclear testing and power plant overloads, but the actual nukes humans have dropped on other humans? They’re most effective when used in an air burst, and they clear up within days.
The power generation and medical applications of nuclear science cannot be overlooked based on warmongering, especially when the part youre concerned about isnt even an issue in that application of the field.
A financial system that breeds billionaires
Farming
The 40+ hour work week.
That was actually a great invention, considering it replaced the unlimited hour work week (60-96 hours being normal in Victorian times). I agree that we should go further though.
Notice I wrote 40+ that means 60-96 work weeks are included.
And I am fully aware that workers have fought hard for the current 5 day work week, and we are working on 4 days even if it’s slow progress.
Always room for improvement, but to think the 40 work week was a bad idea shows how little history they know.
Yes 40 hours is better, but people still end up with very few hours to themselves when all chores are done.
Edit: Speaking as one that is looking at 25-30 more years on the grindstone 😔
Money
Property ownership
It’s a three way tie between:
-
Leaded Gas
-
Aerosols
-
Nuclear bombs
Interesting fact, the same man, Thomas Midgely Jr, invented both tetraethyl-lead as a fuel additive and CFCs, almost killing everyone on earth twice over.
Karma got him in the end after he got tangled in one of his contraptions after he became bedridden with polio and died of strangulation.
-
Leaded Gasoline comes to mind…
