A police official in Arizona has been placed on administrative leave after showing up armed to a student-led protest and provoking an altercation that led to the arrest of a teenage girl. The officer told fellow police who arrived on the scene that he attended the students’ immigration rights protest with the intent of acting as an agent provocateur, according to a news report.

Dusten Mullen, a sergeant with the Phoenix Police Department, has been suspended with pay pending an internal review of his conduct at a protest at Hamilton High School in Chandler, Arizona, on January 30, according to Phoenix Police Chief Matthew Giordano.

“As law enforcement professionals, we are held to higher standards of conduct — both in and out of uniform,” Giordano said. “When we fall short, we must be accountable, and we will not tolerate actions which undermine the trust the community has placed in the Department.”

Fox 10 Phoenix, the outlet to first identify Mullen, reported that Mullen told Chandler Police Department officers on the scene that he was there in the hopes of getting a rise out of the kids that would then allow the local cops to cuff them.

  • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    “As law enforcement professionals, we are held to higher standards of conduct — both in and out of uniform,”

    Everyone laughed

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The higher standard of conduct here being not OPENLY ADMITTING to being agents provocateurs when infiltrating protests to be agent provocateurs.

      Which I 100% guarantee is why they are pissed off with him. Cause he undermined their efforts to falsely arrest people now, and in the future, because protestors in that area are now gonna be on much higher alert for infiltrators intent on sowing discord and undermining the cause.

  • ms.lane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    As law enforcement professionals, we are held to higher standards of conduct

    Bullshit. The officer isn’t dead.

    Alex Pretti is.

    • Carmakazi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      We try to hold them to higher standards of conduct, and they gripe and rage and abuse and kill us for it. They strongarm our courts and our laws making sure their murderous boys’ club isn’t interfered with.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why isnt he arrested?

    If he wasnt a cop, he’d be arrested.

    And in an ideal world, any crime a cop commits would be an automatic felony for betrayal of the power invested in them and of the public trust.

    • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’d challenge the idea that he’d be arrested. White privledge isn’t what it used to be if you’re female, a queer male, or identifiably not a MAGAt, but violent, straight, CIS white men harassing anyone in the outgroups in the name of dear leader often gets “a talking to” at best. I watched our local cops stand shoulder to shoulder with and backs turned to a crowd of armed boogaloos and patched outlaw MC bikers to stare down our much smaller BLM group. When one of their white boys decided to pop a shot into the ground to cause a panic, he was given a pass because “accidental discharge, his safety was off and he was only 16”. Meanwhile the 16yo punk girl who drew a small (A) symbol on the statehouse was a terrorist.

      Cops or not, they go out looking to insight this kind of interaction. They drape themselves in body cams or bait it in front of uniformed police so that they can make themselves out to be the victim. So knowing that, either don’t take the bait, or if you do, make them find out what it’s actually like to be a “victim”.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Fuck the Police.

    If they were held to higher standards, he’d be summarily getting life in prison or the death sentence for getting a traffic violation, much less for aggravated assault.

    The Police aren’t held to higher standards, what … how can anyone even say that with a straight face?

    Fuck off with that insanely obvious bullshit.

    Don’t even suffer this kind of insane gaslighting bullshit for a moment.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The reason this came out is at least one cop did the right thing and put it in their report.

    We don’t need to just prosecute the cop antagonizing protestors, but every cop who didn’t mention in their own report all the shit this guy was saying.

    If they ommitted any of it to protect a cop, they’re not fit to be cops.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The officer told fellow police who arrived on the scene that he attended the students’ immigration rights protest with the intent of acting as an agent provocateur, according to a news report.

    Dusten Mullen, a sergeant with the Phoenix Police Department, has been suspended with pay pending an internal review of his conduct at a protest at Hamilton High School in Chandler, Arizona, on January 30, according to Phoenix Police Chief Matthew Giordano.

    So he picked a fight with a teenage girl, she gets arrested and he gets a paid vacation?

    He doesn’t get the same charges?!

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is the type of stuff a Union can get you. The Police Unions in the US are the single greatest advertising for unions and collective bargaining on the planet. Everything you can think of to complain about the double standard with police, comes back to union negotiated requirements.

      The reasoning behind the whole suspension with pay stuff is essentially to not punish officers who are falsely accused while investigations are under way. Let that sink in for a minute as you think about everyone arrested for a crime and waiting months or years for trials…

      Police officers are falsely accused of things all the time. There are also a ton that are correctly accused and end up receiving no punishment. The two are not mutually exclusive.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Unions are supposed to protect workers from capitalism. But the police union has gone past that. How can we support unions in general, yet prevent them from going this route? (Asking seriously)

          • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I disagree, because the state is still operating within the bounds of capitalism. In a perfect world, state employees wouldn’t need a union. But for example, teachers are state employees. The meager protections that teachers have can largely be attributed to unions.

            The bigger issue is that police largely work as state-sponsored union busters. Any job that involves union busting shouldn’t be allowed to have a union.

  • Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    “As law enforcement professionals, we are held to higher standards of conduct — both in and out of uniform,” Giordano said. “When we fall short, we must be accountable, and we will not tolerate actions which undermine the trust the community has placed in the Department.”

    That’s how you lead a police department! Every other police chief should take notes and resign if that can’t hold themselves to this standard.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s a union thing. Unions are a good thing, until they decide they need to protect their own over the good of the populace instead of just against capitalism.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      SOP. If you’re at a protest and you see some guy in a <Local Sports Team> fitted cap, underarmor, and steel toed boots, you better fucking believe your event is being surveilled and infiltrated.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          $340,000 and he claims to be working 80 hours every week (12 hours a day 7 day a week) yet still has time to go try and fight children on his ‘time off.’

          • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            children

            Well, they where teenagers or simply highschool students - not children, atleast not this time.

            • Zombie@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              A child (pl. children) is a human being between the stages of birth and puberty,[1][2] or between the developmental period of infancy and puberty.[3] The term may also refer to an unborn human being.[4][5] In English-speaking countries, the legal definition of child generally refers to a minor, in this case as a person younger than the local age of majority (there are exceptions such as, for example, the consumption and purchase of alcoholic beverages even after said age of majority[6]), regardless of their physical, mental and sexual development as biological adults.[1][7][8]

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child

              In law, a minor is someone under a certain age, usually the age of majority, which demarcates an underage individual from legal adulthood. The age of majority depends upon jurisdiction and application, but it is commonly between 18 and 21.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_(law)

              They were children. There is no need to adultify minors here.

              • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                This conclusion doesn’t follow:

                between the stages of birth and puberty

                These where individuals past the pubertal age which is commonly stated as 13.

                English-speaking countries, the legal definition of child generally refers to a minor,

                Only necessarily this paragraph relates to the scope. But as stated, minor is the word which should technically be used.

                In law, a minor is someone under a certain age, usually the age of majority, which demarcates an underage individual from legal adulthood. The age of majority depends upon jurisdiction and application, but it is commonly between 18 and 21.

                Isn’t that essentially introducing straw men? The root point of this all was the word child not minor - as this is the correct term as you literally stated here.

                They were children. There is no need to adultify minors here.

                Your proof doesn’t necessarily state that these where children, rather that they where minors. Also that last sentence is completely out of loop, where did I state that they where adults? If you’re going to throw made up accusations then do it somewhere else.

              • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                In what way does this ad hominem have any relation to the inherent ageism and defiance to the definition which I have pointed out?

                No harm, but comparing people to right wing rapists solely using ad honems, and especially on Lemmy is quite illogical to say the least.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            80 hours every week

            Its probably 26 hours a week paid at triple time for whatever crooked shenanigans police union BS reason. I bet this hero actually works more like 3 days a week for his 340k/year.

  • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    He’s one of them “good apples”, he did it off the clock AND he didn’t even murder or rape anybody! Not even a choke hold.

    EXEMPLARY