For example, I’m incredibly confused about how you’re supposedly to measure liquid laundry detergent with the cap. At least the kind that I have sits on it’s side, so if you measure it with the cap it just leaks everywhere and makes a mess.

Or at my parents house they have a bag of captain crunch berries that has a new design, where instead of zipping along the top of the bag like normal, it has a zipper in the front slightly beneath the top. That way when you poor it you can’t see what you’re doing cuz the bag is in the way. Like what the heck who’s idea was that?

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The glue gets weaker when it’s heated. They use the same film for oven meals as well. It comes off fine when you finished heating, but it’s a pain in the arse when cold.

    • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve dropped brands for that shit

      Got a local one that puffs up to like 3x height in the microwave though and that pulls off a lot of the adhesive.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have a truck where the oil drain plug is directly over the axle. I have to strap an offset funnel under the drain to get it to not splash all over the fuck, and of course, it’s not easy to get that stay put so inevitably I have oil everywhere. Same truck has the oil filter tucked up where I need a special oil filter wrench with a ratchet and extensions to remove it, and when you pull the filter out, you have to tip it so it spills the oil inside everywhere.

    I had an idea a long time ago of a website where you can crowdfund a private investigator to find engineers that do shit like this, and a crew to go over to their house and beat them halfway to death.

    • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      About cars, and not necessarily designed poorly, but definitely designed by a man for men: cars that, by default, automatically, immediately unlock all doors when the engine is turned off. A man might be car jacked or robbed, a woman might be car jacked, robbed, or raped.

      (Of course men can be raped too, but it’s not as likely to happen by a strange woman threatening violence than a woman is to be raped by a strange man threatening the same.)

    • redacted2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I learned long ago when something like this bothers me that it is irrational to get angry at objects, then I connected I am not angry at the object, I am angry at the dumb ass turd who designed it.

      btw, I drill a hole in my oil filter before I remove it to drain it so it doesn’t spill all over the front of my engine.

      Maybe all engineers should have to sign their work. Like have their license number or something embossed on it. That way we can find them and inform them of their idiocy.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I will often drive a screwdriver into the bottom a filter, but this one is impossible to get to and even if I did, it would dribble on the exhaust pipe.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      If we’re also talking about vehicles… I’m about average height (~180 cm) but have long-ish legs, and this means that I simply don’t fit well into the driver’s seat of most cars. Even with the steering wheel adjusted all the way up, seat slid all the way back and reclined all the way forward, my legs are hitting the steering wheel and yet I can barely reach it with my hands. Because of this, I sometimes have to take my shoes off while driving.

      Also, almost every car has some annoying things like your oil plug; simply because a modern combustion engine is really quite complicated and there’s not enough space under the hood to give every component a convenient place. E.g. my Delica has the starter located below the engine and quite far back, so it’s mostly covered by the engine protection plate. Good luck banging on that starter relay if it sticks in the off position and refuses to start, while you’re stuck in the mud! However I do agree that making periodic maintenance painful, like in your case, is way worse.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Oh, there’s a few engines like the Northstar and the Toyota 5.7 where the starter is actually under the intake manifold, effectively inside the engine. The amount of stuff you need to take off to even see the starter would make your eyes water.

      • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Had an old Isuzu truck that to start, I sat in the drivers seat with the passengers seat up exposing the engine. Had a long steel rod that I would feed down thru the motor and bang on the starter motor while cranking the keys.

        Sometimes it started straight away, sometimes it took 5 minutes of banging to get the pig to fire. Good Times.

        Woke one morning to start work, went to hop in and saw someone smashed the drivers quarter window. Reckon they tried to start it but must have assumed it had a kill switch.

        Pity they didn’t steal it, as the insurance payout would have been way more bucks that it was worth.

  • Fondots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve always thought that most toilet paper holders are over engineered. You don’t need a little springy rod between 2 posts, you just need an L-shaped bar with the short end screwed to the wall and maybe a little knob on the end of the long side to keep the roll from sliding off. And it’s not that the spring style is especially difficult to use or prone to failure or anything, it just seems like a no-brainer to me to use a one-piece holder with no moving parts instead of one that has at least 4 parts (the base, 2 halves of the roller, and a spring) I’m seeing more of that style around these days, which I appreciate.

    Stove vent hoods that don’t actually vent outside are fucking stupid. My over the range microwave basically just takes smoke from my stove and blows it back out over my head almost directly at the smoke detector.

    I’ve frequently run into shelves, mounting brackets, etc. that seem to totally disregard stud spacing. We got one of those fancy Samsung frame TV’s a while back, to get it to sit so flush to the wall it has its own special mounting brackets, 2 little plates with sort of a modified keyhole slot that you slot 2 little knobs on the back of the TV into. It’s actually not a half bad way to mount a TV, probably one of the easier TV wall mounts I’ve ever personally used, the tv itself is actually pretty damn lightweight (because they moved all the heavy electronics into a separate box you need to hide somewhere) but still I wanted to make sure my fancy TV wouldn’t fall off the wall, so I wanted to mount it to the studs, but of course the spacing of the brackets doesn’t allow that option. I was able to bolt one side a stud but I had to get some toggle bolts for the other side. I’m pretty sure the whole TV is well within the rated weight capacity of one of those toggle bolts in drywall, let alone 2 in drywall and 2 in a stud, but still, it feels like a dumb design choice. (It’s possible that other sizes or newer models do allow for mounting entirely to studs, the size and model I got didn’t)

    I helped a friend replace the wax ring on his toilet recently with one of the newer style rubber gaskets, which as it turns out made the toilet sit imperceptibly higher, which meant that the bolts holding it down were no longer quite long enough to screw the nut onto to tighten it down. With a quick trip to ace hardware and a minute perusing my options, I settled on some Danco zero cut bolts, and I definitely think that is a far superior design to the standard bolts that are probably holding down damn-near every toilet you’ve ever used.

    On the subject of toilets, I can’t think of any particularly good reason for the tank to be a separate piece from the rest of the throne like on most toilets. The gasket and bolts there just add more places for something to start leaking. It’s probably an ease of manufacturing thing, but we have the technology to make one piece toilets now, the two piece style should be obsolete.

    • dx1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      A lot of toilet paper holders are secured to the wall with drywall hangers. An L-shaped one-piece one is basically asking to be torqued right out of the wall.

      • Fondots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’d tend to chalk that up to user error, if you’re putting enough force on your toilet paper holder to pull it off the wall you’re doing something besides just pulling toilet paper off of it or maybe you installed it with the world’s shittiest drywall anchors

          • Fondots@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            It really kind of depends on the type of anchor and the intended use

            The most common little plastic ones that you’re probably picturing are pretty bad in most cases, but some of the heavier duty ones are pretty damn strong if used properly

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Stove vent hoods that don’t actually vent outside are fucking stupid. My over the range microwave basically just takes smoke from my stove and blows it back out over my head almost directly at the smoke detector.

      Amen. The one non-negotiable item when we eventually renovate our kitchen is a vent fan so powerful you should be afraid to bring your small dog into the kitchen when it’s on.

      We had one of those downdraft ones and it was similarly useless, worse than useless even though it technically vented outside because it got so disgusting, the vent grate right in the middle of the stove so things fell in, and heat doesn’t go down, it didn’t pull anything when it ran.

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The two piece toilet does make installation a bit easier since it’s less weight. I wonder if there are any sort of workplace safety weight limit considerations that come into play. E.g., maybe the 2 piece can be done with 1 person, but a one piece could need 2.

    • vandsjov@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Stove vent hoods that don’t actually vent outside are fucking stupid

      Some places you can’t (for whatever reason) install a proper ventilator. Then these with carbon filter will remove some things. But yes, they are far inferior to the full blow vents.

  • ButWhatDoesItAllMean@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I can’t seem to pour out of my pyrex measuring glass without the water dribbling all down the front of the spout making a mess. You think they could have shaped the spout to prevent that better and it infuriates me every time.

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Water has both adhesive and cohesive properties, and this bullshit is one of the results. I hate it so much. Basically the bit of wwater in contact with the surface of the spout likes to stick to that spot; and the above that likes to stick to the water stuck to the surface and so on, making it kinda roll along angled surfaces even when it seems like gravity should be yanking it right off.

      And they absolutely could shape the spout in a way that stops this - they just choose not to.

      Never heard of the oil coating trick @DontRedditMyLemmy mentioned, but it makes sense - oil is hydrophobic, so that could eliminate the adhesion part of the equation; and without that moving the stream initially, its cohesion won’t be an issue either.

      • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Or do what they do in chemistry which is to take a rod (or in the kitchen anything like a dinner knife or handle) and place it against the spout and let the liquid then run down the rod.

    • dr_scientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I have to chime in here, as it’s a subject close to my heart. The old Pyrex measuring cups don’t do this. I went out of my way to buy some on eBay. I can’t imagine why they redesigned like this, but there’s a lot of things I can’t imagine.

      • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I have that and they still are still a pain (I said something else here and it got censored! LOL) to get in or out of a crowded tool jar. Then I always bump that end switch and they pop open in the jar.

    • Jay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I stick mine to the side of the fridge with old hard drive magnets when not in use.

        • Jay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Sure, but my fridge is pretty much right beside the stove so it works out nicely for me.

          • RedCarCastle@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Makes sense, i was more confused about the og pics but looks like heap of people have said the same thing i would of, I’ve never know a set of tongs that don’t have the locking tab at the back

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The cap is a scam, it used to be the size of a soda bottles; now it’s a literal cup.

    you don’t need to measure laundry liquid anyway,

    just put the absolute minimum amount you can pour from the bottle directly in the machine and do 2 or 3 loads.

    • Belgdore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Or if you must use the cap, just drop the cap with the detergent in with the laundry. It will clean itself.

    • crimsonpoodle@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Batteries have a plus and a minus, the spring is generally the flatter end which is generally negative, they’re designed that way to be stackable, although we could probably come up with a slightly more intuitive design.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      A bridge rectifier circuit for each battery slot would solve the issue and, at the low currents of things like remote controls, would be pretty tiny and introduce inconsequential power overhead bbbuuuuuuuuu-uuuuuu-uuuuutttt it would cost money, precious pennies per device. And it would be tricky to market it, educate users, and so on. Such things are too good for this world.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m incredibly confused about how you’re supposedly to measure liquid laundry detergent with the cap.

    You just gave me a stupid idea. First measure out the exact volume of detergent you need for one load - eyeballing it I’d guess 20mL (I’m notoriously terrible at eyeballing volume, so, grain of salt) - then get a 20mL syringe and some IV tubing (it’s got one-way valves, so when you connect a syringe to it and draw up, it pulls from on side of the line; then when you depress the syringe back down, it goes out the other side). Tie something heavy to the intake side of the line and throw it in the bucket of detergent. Run the other side of the line to just above the detergent receptacle if your machine has one; or near the door for you to just aim it.

    Load clothes; pull syringe, push syringe, close the door, run the machine. No detergent dripping all over the place!

     

    …detergent is probably too viscous as-is to go through IV tubing at an acceptable rate, so you’d probably have to dilute it with water first to thin it out, then adjust the amount you pull accordingly.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Some toilets have a perfectly round bowl so they don’t stick out as far and take up bathroom floor space - and they work fine, but only in bathrooms that anticipate the vast majority of its occupants to be equipped with a vagina. For those of us rocking a penis, those fucking toilets are horrible - sitting on that damn thing requires you to contort your junk around like some sausage-Houdini as you’re sitting, so that you can guide it through the remaining 2 square inches of open space not occupied by your legs or ass. Then when you’re actually seated, you still have to sit there and awkwardly hold the thing so it stays pointed straight down.

    Fuck up any part of that, and the tip of your dick hits the seat or the inside of the bowl.

    …and they must be like $3 cheaper than an oval toilet or something, cuz 99% of US apartments seem to be equipped with the round, vagina-only toilets.

    Oval bowls are the way. No matter what’s in your pants, it gets the job done without the significantly increased biohazard risk.

    I guess in fairness, the problem isn’t with their design, it’s with the people who purchase the toilets treating them as sex-neutral when no the fuck they aren’t!

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        STDs would be fairly difficult to get, most stuff requires blood or semen to transfer, or sustained skin on skin contact. STDs die pretty quickly once they leave the heat and wetness of the human body.

        UTIs would be probably more likely, haha.

        Just a little related PSA- you can get tested for STDs for cheap at wellness centers, university clinics, and planned parenthood clinics. The vast majority of STDs are curable, and even the more tenacious ones can be prevented via oral pills or shots like PrEP, whose pills give extremely high resistance to HIV, and whose vaccine has made people immune in trials (needed twice a year to maintain immunity).

        At the end of the day, you want to catch STDs quickly, because they can do damage to your organs. Medicines can cure them. And if you are with a new partner, get tested, or wear condoms (or both!)

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I am a vagina owner from birth, I never imagined the toilet bowl shape would pose an issue to penis owners. From reading your comment I’m still unsure of which toilet bowls you’re talking about, I would appreciate if you (or anyone, really) could point to images of both so I, and potentially others, can compare. TIA

      • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Tape a dildo to your vulva now sit down on a round bowl and see if it touches the rim. Now imagine you have to pee while taking a poop and you now have to shove the end down so it pees into the bowl. Do this without touching the rim.

      • sxt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Space consideration is a bit more obvious with the seat though

        How pronounced the difference is feels like it varies but the rounded ones are frequently just way too tiny.

        • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I knew about different bowl / seat shapes, but I never thought about the issues for folks who have a penis.

          Very enlightening. Thank you for bringing it up! It’s very interesting.

        • blackbrook@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I just measured my usual toilet and while the hole is more squarish than the round one in the picture, the 16.5 length is about right. I don’t have any problem. I’ve got average sized junk, and have maybe a slender to medium build.

          Maybe weight, whether one is a ‘shower’ vs a ‘grower’, or some particular anatomical proportion play into it, I don’t know. Maybe how far back one sits is key. Maybe people vary in their butthole to junk measurement. But I don’t think this is as universal a problem as OP thinks. But, hey I’m all in favor of a longer toilet standard for those for whom it is.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I hate those.

      Sit where it is comfortable and you touch the front, fucken gross, or sit back far enough and stain the bowl.

    • pubertthefat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I had to get a stupid round one because it was the only one with a 10" rough-in (distance from wall to toilet drain), standard is 12". House is from 1925.