No evidence is there - It’s two letters. It has no data, no medical science, not even a blurry photo. Nothing. It’s no more evidence than me saying I sucked off bigfoot - it’s “trust me bro” with signatures, like I already said. There’s no proof, but it is awfully revealing you seem to think that’s what evidence looks like. Someone pinky promises it’s real, and that’s good enough for you.
When Zugibe was finally told the sample came from a communion wafer that had been sitting in water for three years, he stated: "How and why a piece of a human heart is still alive, sitting in distilled water, is totally beyond my comprehen
he had NO IDEA what he was even analyzing so theres no incentive for him to lie
and usually signed papers are EXTREMELY significant as a source.
How do you know, well, any of that is true? There’s no evidence. He sure may have signed the paper, but all the rest is what needs to be proved - and that you refuse to provide evidence for.
I gave you a scientific paper on it, and that all the miracles and artefacts involving Jesus’ blood were AB
Various relics ascribed to have been in physical contact with the historical Jesus of Nazareth have been evaluated for the presence of blood, including the Tunic of Argenteuil, the Sudarium of Oviedo, and most famously, the Shroud of Turin. Interestingly, the blood type on all three textiles was found to be AB by serological testing; a similar result was observed for various modern Eucharistic miracles, in which consecrated hosts are reported to change into human cardiac tissue and blood. As AB is a relatively rare blood type, these collective observations have been used in numerous contemporary media outlets to support the idea that all such objects share a common origin. Here, the scientific validity of mutual blood type expression is evaluated. As discussed, AB antigens are not unique to human red blood cells but are also expressed in bacteria, providing a practical connection between such varied objects. Moreover, this article clarifies that the communal presence of specific and unique polymorphic markers would be required to validate that bloodstains associated with such items truly originate from a single source.
it isnt? Its a PhD Forensic Pathologist that didnt know what he was analyzing and he analyzed it and found cardiac tissue
Cardiac tissue forming on the hosts
No evidence is there - It’s two letters. It has no data, no medical science, not even a blurry photo. Nothing. It’s no more evidence than me saying I sucked off bigfoot - it’s “trust me bro” with signatures, like I already said. There’s no proof, but it is awfully revealing you seem to think that’s what evidence looks like. Someone pinky promises it’s real, and that’s good enough for you.
a forensic pathologist with a PhD
When Zugibe was finally told the sample came from a communion wafer that had been sitting in water for three years, he stated: "How and why a piece of a human heart is still alive, sitting in distilled water, is totally beyond my comprehen
he had NO IDEA what he was even analyzing so theres no incentive for him to lie
and usually signed papers are EXTREMELY significant as a source.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39520651/
How do you know, well, any of that is true? There’s no evidence. He sure may have signed the paper, but all the rest is what needs to be proved - and that you refuse to provide evidence for.
well what kind of evidence do you want?
I gave you a scientific paper on it, and that all the miracles and artefacts involving Jesus’ blood were AB
Various relics ascribed to have been in physical contact with the historical Jesus of Nazareth have been evaluated for the presence of blood, including the Tunic of Argenteuil, the Sudarium of Oviedo, and most famously, the Shroud of Turin. Interestingly, the blood type on all three textiles was found to be AB by serological testing; a similar result was observed for various modern Eucharistic miracles, in which consecrated hosts are reported to change into human cardiac tissue and blood. As AB is a relatively rare blood type, these collective observations have been used in numerous contemporary media outlets to support the idea that all such objects share a common origin. Here, the scientific validity of mutual blood type expression is evaluated. As discussed, AB antigens are not unique to human red blood cells but are also expressed in bacteria, providing a practical connection between such varied objects. Moreover, this article clarifies that the communal presence of specific and unique polymorphic markers would be required to validate that bloodstains associated with such items truly originate from a single source.
I’m sorry, I’m not sure what you’re saying here. When did you bring up the thing about blood before?
his statements here are a signed document and he had no incentive to lie
Sure, so where’s the evidence? Where’s any proof about the claims, beyond just that letter? He had no reason to lie, but did everyone else?