Florida Republican Representative Kat Cammack was widely criticized after opening up to reporter Tara Palmeri about having trouble accessing abortion for an ectopic pregnancy in Florida after she helped pass a six-week abortion ban in the state.

Cammack told the Wall Street Journal that she faced delays in receiving treatment for a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy shortly after Florida’s six-week abortion ban took effect in May 2025.


Cammack blamed those delays not on the law itself but on what she described as misleading messaging from abortion-rights advocates that had made healthcare workers fearful of legal repercussions, telling the Journal:

“It was absolute fearmongering at its worst. There will be some comments like, ‘Well, thank God we have abortion services,’ even though what I went through wasn’t an abortion.'"

    • Smaile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 hours ago

      And it was easy to decern this and instead of making a proper federally recognised standard you threw the baby out with the bath water and again, I’m seeing people here liking literal death threats to the person this post was originally about, is that better then having a civics test, you people act like you both have all the power and none of it at the same time.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Yeah, yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn’t stop to think if they should.

        • Smaile@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Can you do anything other then quote other people? What you just posted has nothing to do with that I said.

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 hours ago

            It’s everything to do with what you said. And if someone said something in a clear, concise manner, I’m not reinventing the wheel.

            • Smaile@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Then explain clearly for the ones in the back then. I think we should filter actually idiot out of decision making and give them social task they can handle as Iv already described.

              • Maeve@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 hours ago

                People have explained, extensively, with few and more words. Are you being deliberately obtuse? Can you speak without snapping and snarling like a rabid cur at those who try to help you?

                There is only one person itt who is beligerantly and stubbornly arguing this buffoonishly stupid idea without an iota of forethought, let alone deep, serious thought. So I will break it down in small words and after this, I am done, ignorant, hateful fool:

                The same weapon you would turn on “stupid” people will as easily be turned on you. Just like the woman in the article, you seek to harm others, and may very well be harmed with your weaponisation of the voting system. Your stupidity has been loudly and proudly with every reply you typed here.

            • Smaile@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Wow your really having a cuntniption fit over me calling you out huh. (copy and past cuz your not worth my time)

              • Maeve@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Your demonstrated lack of knowledge, history, science has me convinced that if ever a test is reinstituted, you would fail it.