• yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    You misunderstand my comment. I’m referring to this:

    If you want a nonprofit videogame co-op that’s gamer first then you’re more than free to go start one.

    I am well aware how corporations work.

    • Signtist@bookwyr.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      But are you? Literally the only people who could possibly make a gamer-first video game is an organization that isn’t money-first. That was my whole point. You have never played a game made by a for-profit developer that wasn’t specifically money-first, even if the gameplay ended up being good in spite of that. Indie devs are the only people making games that sometimes break that mold, and while I wouldn’t exactly call an indie dev “nonprofit,” it’s a lot closer to the truth for the ones that truly make gamer-first games than grouping them with a for-profit corporation.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not saying not to be money first. But it comes to a point where the greed gets too much. Lay off staff bigger CEO payouts. Etc.

        Look at epic games and tell me what they don’t have in common with Team Cherry.