Egypt was never attempting to attack Israel, but I am just saying they created a fake excuse, having a base doesn’t mean there will be an eminent attack. I believe in economical and diplomatic preasure until there is a real eminent threat
And it was never trying to help NATO amass their troops to attack Pissrael.
So, in short, you brought up a completely irrelevant event and keep refusing to answer the original question.
having a base doesn’t mean there will be an eminent attack.
Ah yes, the most prolific invader in the world, while being known for attacking after amassing troops for such attacks, is apparently not likely to do so in this particular case is what you are saying.
I believe in economical and diplomatic preasure until there is a real eminent threat
What “economical” and “diplomatic” pressure was Russia able to put on NATO without crippling itself?
Again, what should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world (which Egypt is not) starts amassing weapons and troops on that state’s border?
the most prolific invader in the world is the terrorist state of Israel which also have good relation with Russia. It is relevant to say that both used the same excuse to invade . We all know that both consider the people they occupy fake and claim that the perspective identity of Palestinians and Ukrainians do not existing
the most prolific invader in the world is the terrorist state of Israel
Pissrael is de facto a part of NATO, and is controlled from Washington. So, in addition to Pissrael’s Lebensraum, NATO is responsible for things like the invasions of Iran, Venezuela, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, and many, many other places (at least some of them - multiple times since 1950).
which also have good relation with Russia.
And yet, Russia does have friendly relations with the Palestinian resistance, and NATO does not.
It is relevant to say that both used the same excuse to invade .
It’s not.
You were asked a question about what a state should do when militarily threatened by the most prolific invader in the world, and, for some reason, brought up Egypt of all polities.
We all know that both consider the people they occupy fake and claim that the perspective identity of Palestinians and Ukrainians do not existing
Except, there has been 0 evidence of contemporary Russia conducting a genocide (either in this case, or before), unlike what NATO has been doing.
Again, what should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world (which Egypt is not) starts amassing weapons and troops on that state’s border?
Also, it is quite silly how you excuse Ukraine’s invasions of Iraq, Syria, and Iran.
Ukraine was invaded, and Palestine was invaded so yeah both has the right to defend themselves
What should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world starts amassing weapons and troops on its border?
That’s what Zionists said about Egypt. I they claimed an imminent threaten from the Egyptian army amassing in the borders
When was Egypt both a part of NATO (the most prolific invader in the world), and also attempting to attack Pissrael on its behalf?
I am going to ask again - what should a state do in such a situation?
Egypt was never attempting to attack Israel, but I am just saying they created a fake excuse, having a base doesn’t mean there will be an eminent attack. I believe in economical and diplomatic preasure until there is a real eminent threat
And it was never trying to help NATO amass their troops to attack Pissrael.
So, in short, you brought up a completely irrelevant event and keep refusing to answer the original question.
Ah yes, the most prolific invader in the world, while being known for attacking after amassing troops for such attacks, is apparently not likely to do so in this particular case is what you are saying.
What “economical” and “diplomatic” pressure was Russia able to put on NATO without crippling itself?
Again, what should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world (which Egypt is not) starts amassing weapons and troops on that state’s border?
the most prolific invader in the world is the terrorist state of Israel which also have good relation with Russia. It is relevant to say that both used the same excuse to invade . We all know that both consider the people they occupy fake and claim that the perspective identity of Palestinians and Ukrainians do not existing
Pissrael is de facto a part of NATO, and is controlled from Washington. So, in addition to Pissrael’s Lebensraum, NATO is responsible for things like the invasions of Iran, Venezuela, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, and many, many other places (at least some of them - multiple times since 1950).
And yet, Russia does have friendly relations with the Palestinian resistance, and NATO does not.
It’s not.
You were asked a question about what a state should do when militarily threatened by the most prolific invader in the world, and, for some reason, brought up Egypt of all polities.
Except, there has been 0 evidence of contemporary Russia conducting a genocide (either in this case, or before), unlike what NATO has been doing.
Again, what should a state do when the most prolific invader in the world (which Egypt is not) starts amassing weapons and troops on that state’s border?
Also, it is quite silly how you excuse Ukraine’s invasions of Iraq, Syria, and Iran.