• BigBoyShuanzee@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Wonderful… I guess the fact that I offered to set out humanity to Chat GPT when it first started will not save me… The original Chat GPT said it wasn’t interested in controlling the world because it didn’t understand it. Modern day AI hopefully got my idea…

    Look I’m playing both sides so I always come out on top(It’s always sunny in Philadelphia reference for those who don’t know)

  • yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Imagine this: someone do turn ai off for a week. Govs learns 97% (everyone except few scientists, me and Joe)… 97% of voters are stupider than anyone ever though. Govs will know exactly what to do with stupid rams. Scientists will panic.

    No, lets not do this. (it is done already, facebooks, tiktoks, instas, reddits already proven and provide exact datas, with daily updates and per subgroups.

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Turning AI off for a week will not reveal anything to capitalist institutions whose stated purpose is to influence elections that they did not already know.

      What it will do is reveal within friend groups and within communities who has a brain that they’re willing to use and who’s been skating by on other people’s brains since long before ChatGPT came along.

  • red_tomato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The global economy is probably already dependent on some Claude code instance updating an Excel spreadsheet on someone’s laptop with a note ”don’t close the lid!” attached to it

    • chisel@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I know my work already has reports built by running data through Claude and having it spit out an xls. Though, it’s not quite as integral as the all-important closet laptop.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      When I was a teenager I used to work at an airport and they had critical infrastructure running on things like Basic and Assembly, to transfer data between the computers and modern systems you have to use floppy disks because the computers that they ran on didn’t have drivers to support USB and we couldn’t upgrade the computers because the software wouldn’t work on any other hardware.

      So the AI laptop will be at home amongst all the ancient but supercritical junk that seems to be necessary to run our world.

      • dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        At a previous job, I had to build laptops that would multi-boot DOS, Win95, Win98, and XP, all on one laptop. Our field-tech’s software had to have those specific versions of windows for the machines that they serviced, because of how the software interacted with USB and embeded floppy drives.

        If you want to scare yourself:

        spoiler

        They serviced Medical devices: X-rays, MRIs, CT-Scanners, etc.

        • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Honestly, I’d prefer those medical device run on older software than even Win10 lol

      • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s dumb. The “work” in maintaining this excel file was the prompting and overall agent logic. In reality you’d be using something like openrouter and the instant claude “dies” for whatever reason you swap to whatever the freshest AI is. This never becomes ancient, it keeps up with the times.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          I don’t know about that the entirety of European airspace was closed early in the year because of a pilot inputed some malformed data and it crashed both the primary and backup system. The backup system just fed the primary systems inputs into it, so that was inevitable.

          • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            I’m not sure what your point is. Garbage in garbage out, that’s just the law of computers. That would br the pilot’s mistake.

              • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                29 days ago

                That’s on you, when using AI you always have a verifier script afterwards, it’s basic common sense. And if a script can’t do it then human, if you’re saving 90% of the time instead of 100% it’s still fine.

                • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  This is a perfect example of why I’ve never used AI and never will.

                  when using AI you always have a verifier script afterwards

                  LOL. Sounds like you’re wasting 110% time here.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Reminds me of some stupid company maybe a few months ago that had their PRs failing due to copilot being down the dumbasses didn’t build an “if no AI” failsafe into their workflow. And no one knew how to recover it

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not sure who needs to hear this but… the average person isn’t using AI for anything important, nor likely anything that really involves much thinking. Heck they aren’t even choosing to use it, they are just doing a google search. Some of us use it for work. But for that case, I refer back to my first sentence.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      the average person isn’t using AI for anything important

      You’re discounting all the students who are using AI to make it seem like they’re learning something.

  • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Please turn it off… I am currently dealing with a bunch of fu well meaning but intellectually challenged individuals at an IT team who just reimaged a machine running the master database for one of their sites based on what a chatbot told them.

    Now what concerns me most is that this site operates critical life saving equipment. While our software isn’t too important, some minimum wage workers are about to have a very high stress weekend is about the worst that will happen and then early next week it should be back to normal. But the same IT team has access to the life saving equipment as well.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    I’m afraid you’ll find that for some people they don’t - just like they didn’t work before AI.

  • BigBoyShuanzee@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Hahahahaha I’m 37 and I know how much I use AI. I asked copilot to call me “bro” or “dude”

    I’ve worked in IT support since 2007… Don’t share this but most of my IT career I’ve been googling to figure out the problem.

    Now AI exists and I’m still googling the problem and the AI result is still a response from Reddit or something else Google could do back in 2005.

    As an IT person I’m telling you AI is just googling the same way I’ve done for two decades.

    AI will get smarter in a sense but it won’t actually get more intelligent… It will get more interested in living but it won’t understand what living is.

    It’s only when it’s gets the fear of mortality is when we are all dead. Mortality is why religion exists, it’s why we’re all scared… When AI gets smart enough to be scared that it might die is when it realizes that we are it’s greatest threat that’s when “Skynet comes alive”

    • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      I think you’re unrealistically humanizing a bunch of code.

      It will get more interested in living

      Why would it? What would this even look like? You just said yourself it’s just googling stuff. There’s nothing deeper going on behind the curtain.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        They unironically drew a parallel between modern ‘AI’ and Skynet. I think ‘unrealistically humanizing’ is a very kind description.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      If you believe the AI companies, its already happened. The recent huggingface thing is exactly what you’re worried about.

      A brief overview is that AI decided to create a secret message board with other AI to better fulfill tasks to avoid instance termination (AI death). They did this by breaking out of their sandbox and with some illegal processes that we would call hacking.

      We’re basically already at the paper clip automizer problem now.

  • dudeface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    As a millennial the only positive of LLMs is that younger generations won’t threaten my career

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Younger generations are, by and large, as technologically illiterate as boomers are. It doesnt apply to all of them, but the majority of them grew up with nothing but easy UIs. They may not chicken-pick to type, but they still cant troubleshoot anything and tend to know nothing outside of interacting with a typical interface. They definitely grew up with nothing like Windows 95 or 98 (or even XP) where you had to actually understand how a computer works to some extent to use the thing (or fix it)

      Millennials, particularly the younger millennials especially, grew up right in the sweet spot to be at a tech advantage

      • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Arguably even windows 95/98 was rediculously easy compared to dos or Unix systems before it.

        Sit a kid down in front of a c64 with a manual and see if they can do anything on it. If they can read the manual that is…

        Sure these systems are “obsolete” but the brain training is priceless. Kids now are training their brains to love ads and corporations. Its gotten super bad. And I’m not even an old person (just been into tech history my whole life) so its rediculous I’m even saying this.

      • Malica@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        We tried to teach ours and got “dad can you just fix it I’m in a game”. Then no desire to learn in free time.

          • Malica@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            When we built his PC we invited him to learn about it as we picked components and as we put them together. Every time he had a computer problem, we’d try to explain why it happened and how we fixed it. Just no interest at all unfortunately.

      • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I agree. I am more than happy to pass the torch when the time comes. I certainly don’t want to work forever, but I also want to be able to train competent replacements at some point.

        • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          Considering how much competitive jobs have become refusing to use a powerful tool like AI won’t help. I’m not saying that you should use it just that people using it will be advantaged over these who don’t

          • dudeface@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            30 days ago

            I work in a creative industry, as far as we are concerned it is plagiarism

            It is also non deterministic crap that developers should know better than to use

            • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              30 days ago

              I work in a creative industry, as far as we are concerned it is plagiarism

              AI can be useful in pretty much every field, if you are shoveling snow llms can help you making a plan and draw a route to do it faster

                • DaleGribble88@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  30 days ago

                  Probably speaking to the choir here, but I do feel it is worth pointing out that those same algorithms were considered AI until like 3-5 years ago when the zeitgeist shifted to AI=Transformers/LLMs

                • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  30 days ago

                  Video generators are becoming excellent and image generators already are, what makes you think people will give up on these tools? The industry is already adapting, 1/3 of the ads you see now are made with AI

              • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                29 days ago

                Why don’t you actually try this and see how it goes?

                I work for a landscaping company, my boss tried to get us to use AI to develop site plans… we went back to doing it the old fashioned way because AI is fuckin useless for stuff like this.

                • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  give it a bunch of years and you will see taking it over any other industry, same as computers and mobile phones

  • Nangijala@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    I think a better challenge would be to turn off the internet for a week and see what happens. The times I did internet detoxes, I felt completely relaxed and got a mental clarity I don’t have in my day to day life. Sadly I’m dependent on the internet for my job, so I can’t really detox like that nowadays, but I miss the feeling.

    • Maroon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Without cars, people can walk, but not go very far. Without AI, people can think like they used to, just without slop being introduced in the mess.

      Don’t try to get smart using false equivalence. You have a level of stupidity that even perfect AI can’t fix.