Assembly Bill 2164 authored by Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D-Orinda) would have prohibited California’s governor from recognizing a request for extradition of a person related to their providing a legally protected healthcare activity in the Golden State to transgender individuals, or if they provide reproductive services. It provided certain exemptions, such as an extradition required by federal law.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Only way this makes sense if he takes health care out of it and specifically frames it as “You don’t get to constrain the powers of the governor.”

    I can also see a flaw in the law… what if some state wants to extradite someone for medical malpractice?

    “Oh, nope! They do gender affirming care! Doctor Mengele is now safe from extradition!”

    Either way, it will be fascinating watching him try to weasel his way through the primaries on this.

  • someone@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This guys slept with his best friend’s wife and then blamed it on alcoholism. What kind of piece of shit do you have to be to do something like that? It’s so treacherous and lacking in empathy to sleep with a best friend’s wife that there has to be a fundamental absence of conscience; and the fact that it wasn’t illegal and he could blame it on alcoholism meant he was able to sweep his vileness under the rug for voter’s to overlook.

    This vote doesn’t surprise me. This vote should surprise no one. Gavin Newsom has always been terrible.

    This is also an example of how money and power have infected progressivism. If the public really had a real selection of candidates instead of curated talking heads, this situation wouldn’t be occurring. The power of wealthy donors or publicity from privately owned rich media conglomerates ensures that usually only the pre-selected are in the public sphere.

      • deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well when one person is married it literally is illegal for them to have sex with someone else. It’s called adultery. Not that I necessarily agree with it, I have pretty negative views of marriage itself, but that’s neither here nor there. It is illegal to cheat on your spouse (technically, and idk if every US state is the same)

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The booze would explain why this douche canoe swerves wildly back and forth across that centrist line line he’s trying to run down a rabbit in a Ferrari.

  • pamparana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This guy is also horrible but the bar is so low these days… The democratic party is also responsible for the mess we are in. They stopped being a party of the people long time ago. Need to purge the Schumers, Pelosis and Newsoms.

  • Binette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Once again, the only thing leftist can be reprimanded for is being right too early.

    • Postimo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean this isn’t even just not progressive, this is collaboration with fascist states to do fascism.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Newsom is a neoliberal. Neoliberals are conservatives. He is controlled opposition. He will try to trick the public into believing he is progressive in 2028. He is a pathological liar and conman just like any other conservative.

    • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No he won’t, if he’s chosen as the new Annointed One then the party leaders who should be impartially managing the primary will cheat for him, just like they did for Hillary, Biden, and Harris.

      If he isn’t, no amount of cheating on his part will be able to overcome the party’s cheating on behalf of whoever the donors have selected.

  • Yggnar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Governor vetoes bill that would limit the powers of the Governor.”

    I’m so shocked.

    • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just one more neolib bro! We’ll get someone worth a damn, you just gotta support one more shithead I promise!!

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hopefully he doesn’t make it past the primaries. Unfortunately if he does and he’s up against a MAGA Republican, there’s only one clear choice.

      Go help campaign for progressive candidates before the primaries! Come November 2028, it may be too late.

      • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Go help campaign for progressive candidates before the primaries

        Please, everyone who thinks the Democratic Party can be saved, to do this. It will convince you faster than anything else I know of that the party isn’t salvageable and that party leadership is just as awful privately as the other guys are publicly.

        • jumjummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          And your solution is to what? Let the country burn down?

          Oh. .ml, yes that probably is your solution.

          • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            My solution is exactly what I said, not sure what part has you confused…

            Oh, .world. Yeah, confusion is probably your normal state.

          • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            .world user advocating for a political party responsible for a genocide and accelerating climate change.

            What else is new?

      • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Unfortunately if he does and he’s up against a MAGA Republican, there’s only one clear choice.

        I even held my nose and voted for Harris, but “stay home and don’t vote” appears to be the only clear choice here. Newsom vs. MAGA is just MAGA vs. MAGA. When Newsom was imitating Trump on twitter, all I could think was “imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.” I don’t think it’s too much to expect the Democrats to have learned something from the 2024 elections; they can ignore progressives, but progressives can ignore them too, and then the whole country suffers.

    • edible_funk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Republicans deserve to be yelled at, and if it’s newsom or vance and you choose vance by not voting, you’re a republican and deserve to be yelled at.

      • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Blindly partisan loyalists deserve to be yelled at.

        I don’t need to do any mental gymnastics to make that apply to the people I’m applying it to.

        Your guaranteed vote no matter how awful the candidate is is the reason the candidate is more awful every cycle.

  • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Basically he said that he thinks this should be left up to the governor, whoever that is, and no matter how righteous and well intentioned, the issue shouldn’t be decided for all time this way, eroding future governors’ authority.

    What a spineless position. Why pass any laws at all? Why not leave everything up to the whims of whoever is in office?

    Doesn’t the legislature decide issues all the time and enshrine those decisions for the future in law? Isn’t that what they do? Why the fuck should extradition for providing healthcare be any different? Isn’t he “eroding the authority” of the legislature in saying no, we should leave this as governor’s discretion, just in principle?

    I’m not just hating Newsom reflexively here. I seriously don’t understand his argument, despite trying.

    • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      His argument is that other republican states will use this as precedent for disobeying federal law, I’m just not sure how he hasn’t realized Republicans don’t care about precedent at all