• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    So this Tesla rocket flying car thing I’m hearing about is actually taken seriously?

    Like, actual human beings with brains actually believe this shit will happen? I mean, come on now… You have a brain, evolution given, please, use it?

    This is another musk thing. Elmo tells obvious lies, his groupies will repeat it as fact ad nauseum, the news sites will obviously publish said nonsense as fact because of course, and three weeks later people will have forgotten about the next bullshit lie from Elmo. Rinse and repeat, he has pulled this bullshit off dozens of times now and he keeps getting away with it. Other people would have been sued into the ground but Elmo? Nope. I guess the guy has charisma or something (the something doing all the lifting because claiming that musk has charisma is just idiotic)

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    The anti-EU narratives have been pushed so widely, also by Musk himself, that even comics like the one above are spreading them uncritically. The tethered caps are not about reducing carbon footprint but about reducing waste in our environment and high costs of cleaning efforts. Yet another EU myth, especially popular among tech bros btw.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        A bit rich from someone who loudly proclaims Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is Ukraine’s fault.

        That said, anti-EU memes using the tethered caps myth are commonly found on right populist sites, so no, it is not a conspiracy.

        • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          It’s the US fault actually, they’re nothing but body bags as Soros explained.
          And they are found everywhere, sensible left-wing people who see these EU ghouls are destroying us and the extreme-right also.
          It’s an idiotic stance to say when fascists say something it must automatically be not true.

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            So you think the US is at fault for Russia deciding to invade Ukraine?

            And you feel the EU is destroying an unspecified “us”?

            Who do you blame for the US attacking Iran? What about Israel’s genocide on Palestinians?

            Maybe I’m trying to make sense of the nonsensical, but I can’t say I’m following the reasoning of your worldview

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah - they did a survey on european beaches and checked which plastic items they were finding. And then they tried to find a way to solve the issue by regulating the production. They did find a lot of bottle caps and plastic q-tips and then they did something against that. That is a really good way of doing things.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        The attached cap is also really convenient. Never have to worry about dropping, losing, or dirtying the cap

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Maybe so, but why is it spreading BS about the tethered caps then? The same way anti-EU memes from tech bros?

  • becausechemistry@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    The point is that there are tons of consumer products being made annoying so we can all feel like we’re doing our part. Meanwhile, the people generating the most pollution continue to do so.

    Sure, it was compressed air. But the power required to compress the ~3 seconds of air thrusters could have driven an electric car for over a hundred miles.

  • KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    can’t build a car that drives itself because it crashes and kills people and wants to amaze us with this dog and pony show of a car that can fly out of control and REALLY kill a lot of people. Fucking excellent job heir musk. Is this what you’ve been wasting billions of our tax dollars on? This bullshit? Hey, while we’re on the subject, did you finally stop killing monkeys and (later on) the unfortunate Mexican immigrant who came across your Texas property? That brain chip thing. You killed a LOT of critters with that one. And Mars. Fuck’s sake. Idiot talk from start to finish - and yet, MORE of our tax dollars for that dog and pony show.

    and you want us to believe this tripe too?

    Oh, and before you go sulk - what’s the ‘gas mileage’ like? Five minutes? Two?

    OUR goddam tax dollars for THIS shit.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      heir musk

      You mean herr musk, heir musk is whatever little crotchspawn he picks to take over his shitheel legacy

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yeah, because they’re obviously dumping a lot of engineering money into it, but it’s something that will never be practical, will probably never be legal to use on actual roads, and will never sell in any significant numbers.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Meanwhile the Chinese elites are flying around in personal drones. Actual flying vehicles.

        In comparison the Tesla demo is like tying a horse to the front of a locomotive to show off the fastest horse in the world.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    The caps are not attached to reduce our carbon footprint but to reduce overall pollution. I don’t like when people paint over such issues with a too-broad brush.

    Also what idiocy did Me-me-me-lon come up with now?

    • Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      He built a wannabe K.I.T.T., I mean the jumping, no talking luckily. Also as fake as K.I.T.T. Its only purpose was to push the stock, like always and to do anything but a compact, cost efficient EV for the masses.

        • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Now I seriously wonder what voice it talks in. Just the standard, bland stuff?
          Or like Hal 9000 maybe? I’m not sure the K.I.T.T.s voice was all that memorable.
          I hate to admit it, but I think I would actually like some very Elony choices. Unless he’s removed all vestiges of being a hapless nerd and only thinks in ragebait nazi anymore.

          Not that I ever wanted one of his, or in fact any talking car.

        • Jiral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I doubt that flying thing had much inside other than what was strictly required for that stunt.

      • ebc@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Have you looked at the price of a model 3 lately? They’re about the price of a moderately equipped Civic… You’re not wrong about the stock thing though

        • Jiral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          In Europe the model 3 costs double if what an entry level EVs cost. Sure, they have less range and stuff but that’s what I was talking about, some affordable entry level car that delivers the basics and not more.

    • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I like the caps being attached because it means you can’t lose the cap. It didn’t even occur to me that it might have to do with littering

      • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Never in my life have I actually lost a cap, but I have been splashed in the face multiple times by those idiotic attached caps.

        • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Me neither.

          That said, up until they changed it, those metal flaps for opening beverage cans were a serious problem, and I could imagine that many consumers are less considerate than me wrt plastic caps as well.

          It’s just a small part of the ongoing enshittification of real life products, and this one’s well-intentioned at least.

    • saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah same with environmental protection and climate friendly. Of course they are connected but nuclear energy for example is climate friendly but still bad for the environment.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        And the people who aren’t precise enough about it are usually out to ridicule people who do care about the ecosphere.

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    This comic has been posted in every single fucking community that’s even remotely relevant, and many that aren’t. We get it.

    Also, it uses cold gas thrusters with compressed air as the propellant, so the carbon footprint is similar to driving any other EV.

    • topperharlie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      so you are telling me that the energy to keep a car in the air is equivalent to move a car on wheels? hmmm interesting…

      • nova@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        no but I think the point was that the gas wasn’t compressed in the car, the same way the electricity wasn’t produced in the car, there’s no direct carbon emissions just indirect ones primarily from however that country is generating its electricity (as the air compressor that was used to charge it probably runs on mains electric)

        • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          The plan is for the vehicle to have an air compressor on board, I don’t know if the vehicle in the demo has it though.

          But yes, compressed air is typically electricity with extra steps.

        • Smaile@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          That’s just straight up not true, you need to build the dammed things and that leaves s big footprint.

          • AliOski@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Okay so what do you want to do? Go back to the stone age? Get of your phone and follow the ways of Ted Kaczynski.

            • nexguy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              So it’s either out-of-control consumer production or back to stone age? No in between?

              • AliOski@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                The in-between was disregarded over a nitpick for it not being “perfectly” carbon neutral.

                That person would complain because the carbon footprint of my fart is too big.

            • Smaile@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              How about just acknowledge the obvious downside and not making stuff up, dolt.

  • Varpeggio@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Is anyone else mortified by how such an obvious and blatant attention grab can so easily captivate the attention of literally every circle of the internet?

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Not really. They made an actual flying car, and that’s just plain awesome.

      We know it’s an attention grab, that’s the entire point of doing a product demonstration. You’re not special for noticing that, in fact it’s so obvious most people don’t feel the need to comment on it.

      • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        10 seconds of hovering ain’t exactly flying. It would have been impressive if they framed it as these are the thrusters we’ve been working on to help land on Mars, heres what we can do with them on a car.

        Instead Musk just goes we can kick flip a car!!! The same presentation goes from interesting tech to eyerollingly cringe. Absolutely a cool tech but has no business being sold in a car road legal or not. It should stay a prototype tech demo.

        • khaleer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          but it made like five flips over the video! It makes for almost a minute of flying! /s-for-god’s-sake

      • dreamkeeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        “an actual flying car” “product demonstration” lmao

        It’s neither a flying car nor a product that will ever be sold on the market. Crazy how gullible the average person is.

        I bet you’re one of those people who insisted FSD was right around the corner 10 years ago.

      • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        They made an actual flying car

        “flying” is doing a lot of those heavy lifting, like 2000kg lifting. It’s like saying Buzz Lightyear from Toys Story can fly.

        • MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          That space convertible shows that it was an actually car with seats and everything. All the clips I’ve seen showed a sealed cockpit and tinted windows. So it could have esially been an empty frame with is lighter to do those stunts with

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Yeah, I think it was basically the RCS unit from a Space-X rocket stuffed into a car-shaped frame with some parts from an electric golf cart glued in there to move it around on the wheels.

          • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            And smaller battery pack to compensate for the pressurised tank and a compliment for Melon Husk small dick.

    • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I actually didn’t see any news on this except for some coworkers asking if I saw it. First time I saw it was yesterday… on lemmy. So maybe we should do better here and not talk about it, like at all? Delete this post and move on?

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      yea, they were discussing in a game im playing the other day, they actually believe it. if it wasnt an obvious distraction from MUSK TURNING OF STARSHIELD/LINK BY TELLING TRUMP TO DO IT.

      • AliOski@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        They believe what? That there was a car using RCS thrusters to quasi-fly made by Tesla?

        If you don’t believe that, then you’re detached from reality.

  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    The Tesla flying car is clearly a Spectacle for Fools, but the gas being used is basically compressed air and doesn’t contribute to our greenhouse gas problem.

    There’s plenty of other aspects to this to make fun of that are factually accurate.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    There is no way its legal for cars to fly around like that. The kill enough people on the ground I dont want them trying to kickflip over traffic.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Of course it’s not legal, even Tesla said so, why would this be something to question?

    • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      The wildest part? It’ll (probably) kick flip over and into an accident; it’s not like the speed direction is going to change with those thrusters.

      You know, like games where you go left to avoid something and right into another object or pit.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I could be done with solar power. Of all the criticism Musk deserves, the carbon footprint of a one-off show is not in the top 30.

      • x0x7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Assuming the same number of panels, if you use X amount of solar power to do Y, then X amount of solar power isn’t available for something else and it has to use non-solar. The only thing that increases solar is adding more panels, rather than nitpicking which thing used the solar and which didn’t.

        The use of energy generally is non-green as long as non-green is a major part of the energy market. Ascribing some end uses of energy as green or non-green is silly and wrong. It is only the production end that can be green or non-green. On the use end all energy is equal.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    is that bottle thing a real thing? I noticed that on some of my recent water bottles and I’ve got to say, I’m absolutely livid about it.

    • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s certainly an irritating change. If it actually makes a big a difference as the granolas say, whatever I guess. But I have doubts about it’s effectiveness. Use a nalgene or something reusable.

      • iknewitwhenisawit@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I was on vacation in a country without attached bottle caps. I put my cap down somewhere and spent a few minutes trying to find it. It was irritating, but I guess you get used to it.