• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 8th, 2025

help-circle





  • That doesn’t change the fact the game is missing half of the promised content,

    That’s just a flat out lie or a delusion.

    The most famous example is how “the game was supposed to be like GTA” some people cry over. Source for that? A interview they did where they stated “we want to be more like Rockstar”. The interview was about development cycles, had nothing to do with the game itself, but one YouTuber saw it and made a video about how “Cyberpunk is going to be GTA in the future, expect bowling”, shit like that.

    It was never supposed to be anything than it isn’t.

    including some that was on the trailers.

    I heard that argument bunch of times, someone even showed me a trailer that supposedly showed these “missing features”. The stuff missing? Wall-running and ripping off turrets. That’s it. That’s literally it. They gave a really good explanation as to why wall running is missing, it’s also a flavour feature, not like adding it back in would change the gameplay significantly, so people crying over that is just… weird to me.

    The fact is that Cyberpunk was a victim of some of the most ridiculously over-the-top hype in gaming history. And when the game released in the state it did (which - to anyone who’s ever followed anything released by CDPR - was the most benign and obvious thing in the world), people lost their minds, because they were expecting The Gaming Messiah to show up and End All Gaming Suffering. Just stupid from the top down.





  • We need to keep educating people about it, and I found a really good method - explain it to them using the Chinese Room thought experiment.

    In short: imagine you’re in a room with a manual and infinite writing utensils, but nothing else. Every now and again a piece of paper with some Chinese characters is slipped through a slit in the wall. Your task is to get that paper, and - using the provided manual - paint other Chinese characters on another piece of paper. Basically, “if you see X character, then paint Y character”. Once you’re done, you slip your paper through the slit to the other side. This goes on back and forth.

    To the person on the other side of the wall, it seems like they’re having conversation with someone fluent in Chinese, whereas you’re just painting shapes based on provided instructions.

    I found that this kind of opens people’s minds to what LLMs actually do - which is writing words that have the highest probability of following previous words and the context of the prompt…