(S)he/They
“Conservative” is not a political ideology, it is a branding term. The Democrats and the old guard of Republicans are both Liberal parties. This is why establishment DNC fights their own party’s left wing more than the Republicans, as they represent an actually different ideology. *The TEA party/Trump folks/ conspiracy RNC is a Fascist political movement
sure, but I don’t really want to deal with the “Saying both sides are the same is literally voting for Hitler people” rn
they are not “centrists” they are “fascist collaborators”
the death penalty should exist exclusively for politicians using there position to entrench themselves in power
Patriarchy is pretty much the entire platform of conservatives
really the only actual use-case for AI
The terms in question being anti competitive. Steam being very good is not an argument against them using there prominent position in the gaming sphere to do the same monopolistic shit Amazon did to enshitify shopping
the return of landlines is nigh
I was thinking of British TV when I posted that so not too surprising if its mostly a thing there.
All of our street cops are also carrying guns around, which (if I’m not mistaken) is not the case everywhere.
Patriarchy and the State are too faces of the same social form. It should never be surprising when the strengthening of one empowers the other.
is it possible to unreact emojis on this platform? cause I did not intend to click that
“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
pretty sure accelerationism is a different thing. basically the idea that to get to a better world the one we currently live in needs to break. unfortunately they don’t seem to care that the manner of breaking is really quite important. capitalism collapsing because workers established networks to feed and house themselves, and capitalism collapsing because the oligarchs decided they’d rather be kings are very different situations
The top quote is refering to borders as a state construction. Nobody denies the existence of boundaries between things in general
Trump and crew literally attempted to overturn the election and the Dems did next to nothing. If we can’t recognize fascist actors before they’ve fully seized control of government then we will never have effective resistance to these types of movements.
people aren’t saying that Kamala wasn’t the lesser evil. They are saying that running evil candidates suppresses voter turnout and that doing so is a loosing strategy (unless doing evil is your gole, like the GOP)
If the Democratics run Harris or New some I might actually lose my mind. have we learned nothing from the past decade?
IQ is not useful as a measure of intelligence, even on a mass scale. It is fundamentally bullshit