What traditional tool can run an automated code review on every PR? Maybe even fix (or propose fixes) for the obvious issues?

A very large chunk of the improvements in the last year have come not from categorically better models, but from the circumstances of the models massively improving. For example, reasoning is just automatic prompt engineering, and eats a fuckton of tokens. Harnesses give LLMs tools, making it easier to turn nondeterminism into determinism (does this code compile is a decision the compiler can answer definitely). Then there’s subagents, which is just automatic context engineering.

Basically, the price per token might not have changed, but in practice, the amount of tokens used to get “SOTA” performance has massively increased.

No, at least in the case of Germany, keeping them running was simply not an economically viable option. They were ANCIENT, so would’ve needed a fuckton of work, which would’ve taken forever AND cost a fortune. This is the opinion of the energy industry THEMSELVES, not from bleeding heart liberals.

There’s basically no universe where building nuclear is a better option RIGHT NOW than just building more renewables and batteries and a smarter net.

I can only think of maybe a small handful of positive instances of “porn in nonporn”. For example, Bayonetta as a character is very much aware of her sexiness, and approves of flaunting it. Compare that to something like Stellar Blade, where the Eve is just “accidentally” super hot, with zero self awareness.

I agree, is what I’m saying.

Listen, as long as I can find fault in any attempt at making the world slightly less shitty, I can avoid having to take any responsibility for my part in all of this.

It’s not just profitable, it also requires most people in the west (probably 99% of people here) to realize there understanding of what a “basic level of quality of life” is is completely scewed by our immense privilege. Globally speaking, we are all part of the top 10% destroying the planet the most. From memory, a single american going vegan can make up for a families worth of emissions in a poorer country.

There’s no amount of rich people we can eat or corporations we can destroy that will allow us to just live like we are at the moment. Nowhere close.

It’s crazy how long that misrepresented study stays alive. The point wasn’t to find fault, it was to figure out how much comes from people in general. After all, nature does create it’s own green house gases.

By the logic of the study, the oil company that sold Swift her kerosene is 100% responsible for it. By that studies logic me, you and Swift are EQUALLY not responsible for ANY oil we use, ever. That’s obviously stupid.

The actual price is hard to really know, but I think training should also factor in. The hype of LLMs is based on the fantastical idea of continunous improvement forever, so you need to keep training. Even ignoring the hype part, you still need to retrain simply to update the data inside the LLM.

I guess we’ll only know for sure after the crash/readjustment.

From my memory of their financials, they actually get enough donations for the browser. The issue is the for profit companies fetish for a million different side quests.

Angebot und Nachfrage. Märkte existieren auch unterm Kommunismus.

Wenn ich 100 Dingens habe, aber 200 Interessenten, dann kann nicht jeder ein Dingens bekommen. Das ist eine unumstössliche Realität. Das hat einen Scheiss mit Profiten zu tun.

Ironischerweise sind diese Profite auch nur möglich, weil nicht genug gebaut wird.

Du verstehst rein garnichts wenn du tatsächlich nicht siehst wie deine Aussage PERFEKT das Zitat beweisen. Es wird in einem Markt gebaut, was sich lohnt. Wenn ich wenig Land habe, und alles ewig braucht, dann baue ich lieber 10 Luxuswohnungen als 20 “normale” Wohnungen.

Du kannst ja als glänzendes Beispiel dein Geld verlustbringend anlegen, hindert dich niemand dran.

Unser fundamentales Problem ist, dass wir 100 Wohnungen nicht magisch auf 200 Familien aufteilen können. Nicht im Kommunismus, Kapitalismus, Anarchismus. Es geht um eine MATERIELLE WIRKLICHKEIT!

Wir müssen mehr bauen. Gerne vom Staat, von mir aus auch Privatwirtschaft. Es gibt keinen Weg drumherum.

Das hat absolut garnichts damit zu tun.

Bitte, ich find ja eigentlich linke Themen ganz gut, bin Fan. Aber wie von Linken über Wohnungen gesprochen wird ist absolutes Kindergartenniveau. Schlimmmer noch. Ein Kleinkind versteht, dass man 10 Stifte nicht auf 20 Kinder verteilen kann. Deswegen fragt es nach 10 zusätzlichen Stiften. Ob die 10 Stifte jetzt 10 Kindern gehören, der Lehrerin, dem Staat, dem Kapitalist oder wem auch immer ist im Kontext dieses Problems scheiss egal.

Kannst du mir bitte für Dumme erklären, wie das helfen soll? Vorallem, weil man bei Enteignung sowieso für die Wohnungen zahlt, und das grösste Problem fehlender Wohnraum ist.

Wenn ich 100 Wohnungen habe, aber 200 Familien, dann gibt es weder im Kommunismus noch im Anarchismus oder im Kapitalismus eine Möglichkeit, alle unterzubringen. Es muss mehr gebaut werden, Punkt aus.

There’s following the law, and then there’s giving away data to government agency just because they asked nicely, and could MAYBE get a warrant in the future. It is the equivalent of letting police into your house without a warrant, because maybe they’ll get one.

The times where the democrats had full power with a good margin were the best/least bad legislative periods the USA has ever had. Yes, yes, they are bad in so many other ways. Yes, just voting for them isn’t going to just fix everything.

But I NEED online leftists to shut the fuck up if they don’t have a better option for the 4 hours once every 4 years it takes to vote. What exactly are you doing with exactly those hours that it having such a big impact on the world? Bitching online? Reading theory for the 50-th time?

You people can’t even revolutionize what you eat for justice, yet you expect an instant, bloody revolution to magically spring forth purely from online shit posting.

Well, according to the logic present in this very thread, some people have tried organizing, but they haven’t single handedly stopped fascism, ergo organizing labor is useless, just like voting. There’s nothing we can do that doesn’t require a large amount of people to organize and invest time, effort and money. Of all the options, voting is (because of laws) still the cheapest, most legal, least likely to get you fired option. And we can’t even manage that.

No, we’re just talking about actually voting here. Don’t add a bunch of stuff. You don’t need to canvas to vote. And in the context of the thing written, what action do you think people bitching in this thread are genuinely going to take? How many walmart firebombers are among all the terminally online leftists here?

Haven’t we had this discussion like a billion times? Isn’t every art movement just a rebellion against what “the man” thinks “real” art is?

It absolutely is the best option, IF these are the only options. You don’t get to constantly pretend that there’s some obvious other solution without ever naming AND campaigning it. Basically, this entire thread is filled to the brim with online leftists hating on every possible option, propose fiire bombing walmarts, and then NEVER ACTUALLY FIREBOMB A WALMART.

It requires immense amounts of privilege to campaign for waiting for a better option to magically manifest.

Yes, and white people get depressed about racism, so they just ignore what bums them out. Insane that a defense of online leftists amounts to “they just such smol bean, they too bummed for voting sad face”.