Any ideas on an potential increase in ambient temperature from those dark surfaces of the panels?

Offsetting or replacing climate warming electricity generation, especially through what seems to be an increased efficiency, is great, but we’re still doing the climate warming methods.

And, not a statement of “don’t do this”, just concerned about regions of cold and frozen environments given our present course and interested in the data.

“The negative things people are upset about already happen, so we should be fine with those things being made easier and happening more.”

Banana

I heard some statements that the “AI” justification is just on paper. Maybe partly because it’s an easy out, and/or to keep the stick bridge looking sustainable. But that it’s in reality not directly tied to any specific takeover of these individuals’ work being presently or immediately taken over, and likely not efficiently either, by software. I’m not too deep into the economy so please only regard this as speculation until you can verify.

Trying to understand this type of concept, as economics is not a super strong topic of mine, and I hear or see this type of phrasing sometimes; “creating wealth” “wealth creation”.

How do you define how someone creates wealth?

Uh, might be referencing that Eve wasn’t the first woman in the sort of Genesis story canon. Idk if many people know that, or if I’m remembering correctly.

This is relating to requesting additional clinical trials, but maybe I don’t understand?

Could you elaborate?

Edit: looks like it’s actually a request for approval for commercialization/use of the vaccine. Not sure what I was doing when I looked the first time.

And the article linked in the OP states:

"Pfizer said it will seek regulatory approval for a Lyme disease vaccine candidate despite failing a late-stage trial.

Pfizer said not enough people contracted Lyme disease to be confident in the results, but cited “strong efficacy” for its decision to move forward."

Which is sort of different wording of what the OP does still say, so, yeah, some doubt’s about it. I can see some desire to have additional studies at least.

Would these work outside of Europe, say in the U.S. or Canada?

Have you heard about Tuxedo computers?

European, iirc. Default Linux focus. Possibly repairability focused (an expectation, but I don’t recall).

Looks like they have a link talking about this, and someone commented that they use a service mentioned for contactless payments.

https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2025/06/contactless-payments-with-grapheneos/

I haven’t reviewed this myself as it’s not a concern for me.

Amid tensions over President Trump’s immigration crackdown in Minnesota and beyond, federal agents were told this week that they have broader power to arrest people without a warrant, according to an internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo reviewed by The New York Times.

The change expands the ability of lower-level ICE agents to carry out sweeps rounding up people they encounter and suspect are undocumented immigrants, rather than targeted enforcement operations in which they set out, warrant in hand, to arrest a specific person.

The shift comes as the administration has deployed thousands of masked immigration agents into cities nationwide. A week before the memo, it came to light that Todd M. Lyons, the acting director of the agency, had issued guidance in May saying agents could enter homes with only an administrative warrant, not a judicial one. And the day before the memo, Mr. Trump said he would “de-escalate a little bit” in Minneapolis, after agents fatally shot two people in the crackdown there.

The memo, addressed to all ICE personnel and signed on Wednesday by Mr. Lyons, centers on a federal law that empowers agents to make warrantless arrests of people they believe are undocumented immigrants, if they are “likely to escape” before an arrest warrant can be obtained.

ICE has long interpreted that standard to mean situations in which agents believe someone is a “flight risk,” and unlikely to comply with future immigration obligations like appearing for hearings, according to the memo. But Mr. Lyons criticized that construction as “unreasoned” and “incorrect,” changing the agency’s interpretation of it to instead mean situations in which agents believe someone is unlikely to remain at the scene.

Seems like a strange way to spell hostage.

I recall the statements that some dumbassshitLLM was going to be used for military actions or whatever.

Got it. They’re playing Risk and whatever else.

From the article, it seems like it’s been sent to:

https://icelist.is/

https://icelist.is/

Hello. Sorry, I couldn’t find an immediate source when I did a web search with the text you quoted. Do you have a source for it you could share, or recall when you saw it?

Thanks!

Is ladybird even out? I saw something about it but I thought looking it up got me to something about it being set for some release this next year?

What’s the ‘applescript’?

Not to create an argument, which isn’t my intent, as certainty there may be a thought such as, “scraping as it stands is good because of the simplification and ‘benefit’”. Which, sure, it’s easiest to wide net and absorb, to simply the concept, at least as I’m also understanding it.

Yet, maybe it is the process of scraping, and also absorbing into databases including AI, which is a worthwhile point of conversation. Maybe how we’ve been doing something isn’t the continued ‘best course’ for a situation.

Undeniably, more minutely monitoring what is scraped and stored creates large quantities, and large in scope, of questions and obstacles, but, maybe having that conversation is where things should go.

Thoughts?